Voracious Varmint
Played in 606 Green decks
3030+28+3+1+6+12+
Color Identity Spread
18.8% Green
Commanders
Radagast the Brown 14.8% of decks
Radagast the Brown 14.8% of decks
Shigeki, Jukai Visionary 6.2% of decks
Shigeki, Jukai Visionary 6.2% of decks
Yedora, Grave Gardener 2.4% of decks
Yedora, Grave Gardener 2.4% of decks
Diamond Weapon 4.1% of decks
Diamond Weapon 4.1% of decks
Meng Huo, Barbarian King 21.4% of decks
Meng Huo, Barbarian King 21.4% of decks
Kogla, the Titan Ape 2.5% of decks
Kogla, the Titan Ape 2.5% of decks
Most Relevant
Undergrowth Leopard 18.0% of decks
Undergrowth Leopard 18.0% of decks
Insidious Fungus 25.4% of decks
Insidious Fungus 25.4% of decks
Trickster's Elk 18.3% of decks
Trickster's Elk 18.3% of decks
Spore Frog 22.4% of decks
Spore Frog 22.4% of decks
Poison Dart Frog 20.0% of decks
Poison Dart Frog 20.0% of decks
Caustic Caterpillar 14.0% of decks
Caustic Caterpillar 14.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 3.47 · 14.8% (109 of 736 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 2.40 · 6.2% (61 of 980 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 1.55 · 2.4% (40 of 1,646 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 1.47 · 4.1% (17 of 412 decks)
- Meng Huo, Barbarian King relevance 1.12 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.92 · 2.5% (8 of 320 decks)
- Storm, Shaker of Skies relevance 0.76 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.61 · 2.9% (3 of 105 decks)
- Hua Tuo, Honored Physician relevance 0.54 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.53 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 0.47 · 1.1% (4 of 363 decks)
- The Boulder, Ready to Rumble relevance 0.45 · 1.4% (3 of 213 decks)
- Michelangelo, Game Master relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Mister Hyde, Monster Within relevance 0.40 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Flatman relevance 0.40 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Martial Mentor relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.37 · 1.5% (2 of 137 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.35 · 1.3% (2 of 154 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.27 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.25 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.24 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Bounteous Kirin relevance 0.23 · 1.4% (1 of 71 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.21 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- Harold and Bob, First Numens relevance 0.21 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.21 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- Master Chef // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.21 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
- Ka-Zar of the Savage Land relevance 0.21 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 0.21 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.21 · 1.1% (1 of 87 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Undergrowth Leopard relevance 0.96 · 18.0% (109 of 606 decks)
- Insidious Fungus relevance 0.85 · 25.4% (154 of 606 decks)
- Trickster's Elk relevance 0.82 · 18.3% (111 of 606 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 0.75 · 22.4% (136 of 606 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.71 · 20.0% (121 of 606 decks)
- Caustic Caterpillar relevance 0.67 · 14.0% (85 of 606 decks)
- Haywire Mite relevance 0.61 · 18.6% (113 of 606 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.59 · 12.7% (77 of 606 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.57 · 20.3% (123 of 606 decks)
- Town Greeter relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (65 of 606 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.56 · 34.0% (206 of 606 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.56 · 12.9% (78 of 606 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.54 · 20.1% (122 of 606 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (73 of 606 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.53 · 12.2% (74 of 606 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.53 · 18.0% (109 of 606 decks)
- Say Its Name relevance 0.52 · 8.7% (53 of 606 decks)
- Molt Tender relevance 0.52 · 8.7% (53 of 606 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.50 · 17.3% (105 of 606 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.50 · 12.2% (74 of 606 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.50 · 10.7% (65 of 606 decks)
- Keeper of Progenitus relevance 0.49 · 7.9% (48 of 606 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.49 · 10.9% (66 of 606 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.49 · 10.1% (61 of 606 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.48 · 10.4% (63 of 606 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.47 · 12.7% (77 of 606 decks)
- Dawntreader Elk relevance 0.47 · 9.1% (55 of 606 decks)
- Revive relevance 0.47 · 10.6% (64 of 606 decks)
- Spinewoods Armadillo relevance 0.46 · 7.6% (46 of 606 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.46 · 12.4% (75 of 606 decks)
All creatures (28)
- Undergrowth Leopard relevance 0.96 · 18.0% (109 of 606 decks)
- Insidious Fungus relevance 0.85 · 25.4% (154 of 606 decks)
- Trickster's Elk relevance 0.82 · 18.3% (111 of 606 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 0.75 · 22.4% (136 of 606 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.71 · 20.0% (121 of 606 decks)
- Caustic Caterpillar relevance 0.67 · 14.0% (85 of 606 decks)
- Haywire Mite relevance 0.61 · 18.6% (113 of 606 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.59 · 12.7% (77 of 606 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.57 · 20.3% (123 of 606 decks)
- Town Greeter relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (65 of 606 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.56 · 34.0% (206 of 606 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.54 · 20.1% (122 of 606 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (73 of 606 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.53 · 12.2% (74 of 606 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.53 · 18.0% (109 of 606 decks)
- Molt Tender relevance 0.52 · 8.7% (53 of 606 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.50 · 17.3% (105 of 606 decks)
- Keeper of Progenitus relevance 0.49 · 7.9% (48 of 606 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.47 · 12.7% (77 of 606 decks)
- Dawntreader Elk relevance 0.47 · 9.1% (55 of 606 decks)
- Spinewoods Armadillo relevance 0.46 · 7.6% (46 of 606 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.46 · 12.4% (75 of 606 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.44 · 16.2% (98 of 606 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.43 · 18.0% (109 of 606 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.43 · 22.9% (139 of 606 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (82 of 606 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.42 · 11.2% (68 of 606 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.42 · 12.7% (77 of 606 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 0.46 · 7.3% (44 of 606 decks)
- Skateboard relevance 0.45 · 7.9% (48 of 606 decks)
- Strider Harness relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (38 of 606 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Dawn's Reflection relevance 0.41 · 6.9% (42 of 606 decks)
All instants (6)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.56 · 12.9% (78 of 606 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.50 · 12.2% (74 of 606 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.50 · 10.7% (65 of 606 decks)
- Season of Renewal relevance 0.43 · 7.9% (48 of 606 decks)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.43 · 10.2% (62 of 606 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.42 · 9.6% (58 of 606 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Say Its Name relevance 0.52 · 8.7% (53 of 606 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.49 · 10.9% (66 of 606 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.49 · 10.1% (61 of 606 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.48 · 10.4% (63 of 606 decks)
- Revive relevance 0.47 · 10.6% (64 of 606 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.45 · 11.4% (69 of 606 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.45 · 10.2% (62 of 606 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.44 · 9.4% (57 of 606 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 0.44 · 9.6% (58 of 606 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.44 · 10.9% (66 of 606 decks)
- True Ancestry relevance 0.44 · 9.7% (59 of 606 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.43 · 10.4% (63 of 606 decks)
EDH data for Voracious Varmint: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 606 real decks.
































































