Crushing Vines
Played in 73 Simic decks
630+13+2+1+9+6+3+6+
Color Identity Spread
5.9% Simic
Commanders
Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kodama of the East Tree 2.9% of decks
Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kodama of the East Tree 2.9% of decks
Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Slurrk, All-Ingesting 100.0% of decks
Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Slurrk, All-Ingesting 100.0% of decks
Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer 100.0% of decks
Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer 100.0% of decks
Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor 1.6% of decks
Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor 1.6% of decks
Zegana, Utopian Speaker 1.2% of decks
Zegana, Utopian Speaker 1.2% of decks
Guru Pathik 1.1% of decks
Guru Pathik 1.1% of decks
Most Relevant
Broken Wings 21.9% of decks
Broken Wings 21.9% of decks
Crushing Canopy 15.1% of decks
Crushing Canopy 15.1% of decks
Run Away Together 20.5% of decks
Run Away Together 20.5% of decks
Cancel 15.1% of decks
Cancel 15.1% of decks
Giant Growth 12.3% of decks
Giant Growth 12.3% of decks
Essence Scatter 15.1% of decks
Essence Scatter 15.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.18 · 2.9% (3 of 102 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 1.05 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 1.05 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.51 · 1.6% (1 of 63 decks)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 0.48 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
- Guru Pathik relevance 0.46 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Broken Wings relevance 1.05 · 21.9% (16 of 73 decks)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 1.03 · 15.1% (11 of 73 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.75 · 20.5% (15 of 73 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.62 · 15.1% (11 of 73 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.59 · 15.1% (11 of 73 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.54 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.52 · 21.9% (16 of 73 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.50 · 15.1% (11 of 73 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.46 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Simic Sky Swallower relevance 0.45 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.43 · 27.4% (20 of 73 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.43 · 15.1% (11 of 73 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.43 · 16.4% (12 of 73 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.41 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.40 · 21.9% (16 of 73 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.39 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.38 · 21.9% (16 of 73 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.38 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.37 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.37 · 28.8% (21 of 73 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.35 · 15.1% (11 of 73 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.34 · 16.4% (12 of 73 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.31 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 0.31 · 13.7% (10 of 73 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.30 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.29 · 13.7% (10 of 73 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.52 · 21.9% (16 of 73 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.50 · 15.1% (11 of 73 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.46 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Simic Sky Swallower relevance 0.45 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.38 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.37 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.35 · 15.1% (11 of 73 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.34 · 16.4% (12 of 73 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.31 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 0.31 · 13.7% (10 of 73 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.29 · 13.7% (10 of 73 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.25 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.43 · 15.1% (11 of 73 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.40 · 21.9% (16 of 73 decks)
All instants (9)
- Broken Wings relevance 1.05 · 21.9% (16 of 73 decks)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 1.03 · 15.1% (11 of 73 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.75 · 20.5% (15 of 73 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.62 · 15.1% (11 of 73 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.59 · 15.1% (11 of 73 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.54 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.43 · 27.4% (20 of 73 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.30 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.43 · 16.4% (12 of 73 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.41 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.39 · 12.3% (9 of 73 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.38 · 21.9% (16 of 73 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.37 · 28.8% (21 of 73 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.74 · 37.0% (27 of 73 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.28 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
All lands (6)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.68 · 20.5% (15 of 73 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.62 · 16.4% (12 of 73 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.53 · 32.9% (24 of 73 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.50 · 19.2% (14 of 73 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.43 · 11.0% (8 of 73 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.39 · 23.3% (17 of 73 decks)
EDH data for Crushing Vines: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 73 real decks.






































