Crushing Vines
Played in 255 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
20.7% Green
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (17)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.44 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 1.06 · 1.0% (12 of 1,191 decks)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 1.03 · 1.6% (7 of 436 decks)
- Seshiro the Anointed relevance 0.88 · 1.6% (5 of 319 decks)
- Nev, the Practical Dean relevance 0.76 · 2.2% (3 of 136 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.70 · 1.1% (4 of 356 decks)
- Kolvori, God of Kinship // The Ringhart Crest relevance 0.68 · 3.2% (2 of 62 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.62 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Ezekiel Sims, Spider-Totem relevance 0.62 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Arashi, the Sky Asunder relevance 0.46 · 4.0% (1 of 25 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.42 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.42 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- X-23, Deadly Weapon relevance 0.35 · 1.8% (1 of 57 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.35 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Master Chef relevance 0.33 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 0.33 · 1.5% (1 of 68 decks)
- Verdeloth the Ancient relevance 0.32 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 1.60 · 28.6% (73 of 255 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 1.10 · 28.6% (73 of 255 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.79 · 15.3% (39 of 255 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.69 · 22.7% (58 of 255 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.61 · 27.1% (69 of 255 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.51 · 12.5% (32 of 255 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.50 · 15.7% (40 of 255 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.47 · 31.8% (81 of 255 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.47 · 14.9% (38 of 255 decks)
- Wildsize relevance 0.46 · 8.2% (21 of 255 decks)
- Bramblecrush relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (19 of 255 decks)
- Entourage of Trest relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (18 of 255 decks)
- Mossbeard Ancient relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (18 of 255 decks)
- Unforgiving Aim relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (19 of 255 decks)
- Hunt the Weak relevance 0.42 · 7.1% (18 of 255 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.40 · 8.6% (22 of 255 decks)
- Blossom Dryad relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (15 of 255 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.38 · 8.2% (21 of 255 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.38 · 12.5% (32 of 255 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.38 · 14.1% (36 of 255 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.38 · 22.7% (58 of 255 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.37 · 6.3% (16 of 255 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.37 · 8.6% (22 of 255 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.36 · 9.0% (23 of 255 decks)
- Arbor Armament relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (16 of 255 decks)
- Burlfist Oak relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (14 of 255 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.35 · 9.8% (25 of 255 decks)
- Magnigoth Sentry relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (14 of 255 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.35 · 20.0% (51 of 255 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (23 of 255 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.47 · 14.9% (38 of 255 decks)
- Entourage of Trest relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (18 of 255 decks)
- Mossbeard Ancient relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (18 of 255 decks)
- Blossom Dryad relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (15 of 255 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.38 · 12.5% (32 of 255 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.37 · 8.6% (22 of 255 decks)
- Burlfist Oak relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (14 of 255 decks)
- Magnigoth Sentry relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (14 of 255 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (23 of 255 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.34 · 10.2% (26 of 255 decks)
- Ambush Viper relevance 0.34 · 10.6% (27 of 255 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.33 · 18.4% (47 of 255 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (17 of 255 decks)
- Silverback Shaman relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (13 of 255 decks)
- Seeker of Sunlight relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (12 of 255 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.35 · 14.9% (38 of 255 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (17 of 255 decks)
All instants (16)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 1.60 · 28.6% (73 of 255 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 1.10 · 28.6% (73 of 255 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.79 · 15.3% (39 of 255 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.69 · 22.7% (58 of 255 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.61 · 27.1% (69 of 255 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.50 · 15.7% (40 of 255 decks)
- Wildsize relevance 0.46 · 8.2% (21 of 255 decks)
- Unforgiving Aim relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (19 of 255 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.40 · 8.6% (22 of 255 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.37 · 6.3% (16 of 255 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.36 · 9.0% (23 of 255 decks)
- Arbor Armament relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (16 of 255 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.35 · 20.0% (51 of 255 decks)
- Gift of Growth relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (14 of 255 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.33 · 9.0% (23 of 255 decks)
- Thwart the Enemy relevance 0.32 · 5.9% (15 of 255 decks)
All sorceries (16)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.51 · 12.5% (32 of 255 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.47 · 31.8% (81 of 255 decks)
- Bramblecrush relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (19 of 255 decks)
- Hunt the Weak relevance 0.42 · 7.1% (18 of 255 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.38 · 8.2% (21 of 255 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.38 · 14.1% (36 of 255 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.38 · 22.7% (58 of 255 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.35 · 9.8% (25 of 255 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.35 · 8.6% (22 of 255 decks)
- Thrive relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (14 of 255 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.34 · 7.5% (19 of 255 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.34 · 14.1% (36 of 255 decks)
- Sprouting Renewal relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (13 of 255 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.33 · 11.0% (28 of 255 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.33 · 8.2% (21 of 255 decks)
- Outmuscle relevance 0.33 · 6.3% (16 of 255 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.40 · 21.2% (54 of 255 decks)
EDH data for Crushing Vines: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 255 real decks.