22
All commanders (22)
  1. Blind Seer relevance 2.16 · 7.6% (36 of 471 decks)
  2. Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 2.14 · 3.4% (108 of 3,191 decks)
  3. Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.96 · 1.7% (16 of 958 decks)
  4. Katara, Waterbending Master relevance 0.90 · 1.1% (26 of 2,397 decks)
  5. Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 0.90 · 1.7% (13 of 766 decks)
  6. Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.86 · 1.3% (17 of 1,334 decks)
  7. Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.75 · 1.4% (10 of 698 decks)
  8. Mondo Gecko relevance 0.68 · 1.8% (6 of 332 decks)
  9. Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.54 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
  10. Vendilion Clique relevance 0.44 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
  11. Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.44 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
  12. K-9, Mark I relevance 0.36 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
  13. Katara, Bending Prodigy relevance 0.36 · 1.6% (2 of 127 decks)
  14. Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Faceless One relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
  15. Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.35 · 1.4% (2 of 138 decks)
  16. Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.34 · 1.4% (2 of 142 decks)
  17. Gadwick, the Wizened relevance 0.30 · 1.1% (2 of 184 decks)
  18. Kira, Great Glass-Spinner relevance 0.29 · 1.0% (2 of 192 decks)
  19. Kang the Conqueror relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
  20. Saruman the White relevance 0.25 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
  21. Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 0.23 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
  22. Valeria Richards, Precocious relevance 0.22 · 1.5% (1 of 68 decks)

EDH data for Change the Equation: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 575 real decks.