Prosperous Pirates
Played in 82 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
3.8% Simic
All commanders (4)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 1.30 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 1.03 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 1.03 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.44 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Kozilek's Predator relevance 1.04 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.99 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.95 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.80 · 34.1% (28 of 82 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.77 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.69 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Master of Waves relevance 0.67 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Deep Forest Hermit relevance 0.66 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.66 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.66 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.65 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.65 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- City of Death relevance 0.64 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Biovisionary relevance 0.64 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.63 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.61 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Owlbear relevance 0.60 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.58 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.58 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.55 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.55 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.54 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.52 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.52 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.51 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 0.51 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.49 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.49 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Kozilek's Predator relevance 1.04 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.99 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.95 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.80 · 34.1% (28 of 82 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.77 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Master of Waves relevance 0.67 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Deep Forest Hermit relevance 0.66 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.65 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.65 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Biovisionary relevance 0.64 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.61 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Owlbear relevance 0.60 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.58 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.58 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.55 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.54 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.52 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 0.51 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.49 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Drix Fatemaker relevance 0.49 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.48 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.48 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.47 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.47 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.47 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Wavesifter relevance 0.45 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.45 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Gruff Triplets relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.69 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.66 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.66 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.63 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.47 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- City of Death relevance 0.64 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
All instants (4)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.55 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.49 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.49 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Druid's Deliverance relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.52 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.51 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.48 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.45 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.49 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.46 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
All lands (3)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.65 · 32.9% (27 of 82 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.61 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.48 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
EDH data for Prosperous Pirates: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 82 real decks.