Prosperous Pirates
Played in 68 Temur decks
Color Identity Spread
3.1% Temur
30+37+1+5+2+1+4+
All most relevant (30)
- Bronze Walrus relevance 2.73 · 42.6% (29 of 68 decks)
- Skyscanner relevance 2.73 · 42.6% (29 of 68 decks)
- Scuttlemutt relevance 2.63 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
- Sandstone Oracle relevance 2.57 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 2.43 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Opaline Unicorn relevance 2.40 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 2.38 · 38.2% (26 of 68 decks)
- Alloy Myr relevance 2.32 · 41.2% (28 of 68 decks)
- Quicksmith Genius relevance 2.31 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 2.19 · 42.6% (29 of 68 decks)
- Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam relevance 2.19 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 2.18 · 55.9% (38 of 68 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 2.12 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Meria, Scholar of Antiquity relevance 2.11 · 38.2% (26 of 68 decks)
- Hulking Metamorph relevance 2.11 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Iron Myr relevance 2.10 · 41.2% (28 of 68 decks)
- Copper Myr relevance 2.09 · 41.2% (28 of 68 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 2.04 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 2.03 · 48.5% (33 of 68 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 2.02 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 2.01 · 36.8% (25 of 68 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 1.98 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 1.95 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Research Thief relevance 1.93 · 30.9% (21 of 68 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 1.93 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 1.90 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
- Bitter Reunion relevance 1.88 · 30.9% (21 of 68 decks)
- Bladegriff Prototype relevance 1.87 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 1.82 · 38.2% (26 of 68 decks)
- Rapacious Dragon relevance 1.79 · 57.4% (39 of 68 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Bronze Walrus relevance 2.73 · 42.6% (29 of 68 decks)
- Skyscanner relevance 2.73 · 42.6% (29 of 68 decks)
- Scuttlemutt relevance 2.63 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
- Sandstone Oracle relevance 2.57 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 2.43 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Opaline Unicorn relevance 2.40 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 2.38 · 38.2% (26 of 68 decks)
- Alloy Myr relevance 2.32 · 41.2% (28 of 68 decks)
- Quicksmith Genius relevance 2.31 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 2.19 · 42.6% (29 of 68 decks)
- Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam relevance 2.19 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 2.18 · 55.9% (38 of 68 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 2.12 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Meria, Scholar of Antiquity relevance 2.11 · 38.2% (26 of 68 decks)
- Hulking Metamorph relevance 2.11 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Iron Myr relevance 2.10 · 41.2% (28 of 68 decks)
- Copper Myr relevance 2.09 · 41.2% (28 of 68 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 2.04 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 2.03 · 48.5% (33 of 68 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 2.01 · 36.8% (25 of 68 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 1.98 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
- Research Thief relevance 1.93 · 30.9% (21 of 68 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 1.93 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
- Bladegriff Prototype relevance 1.87 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 1.82 · 38.2% (26 of 68 decks)
- Rapacious Dragon relevance 1.79 · 57.4% (39 of 68 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 1.79 · 58.8% (40 of 68 decks)
- Ingenious Artillerist relevance 1.79 · 36.8% (25 of 68 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 1.75 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
- Duplicant relevance 1.67 · 38.2% (26 of 68 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 1.66 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 1.65 · 50.0% (34 of 68 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 1.61 · 55.9% (38 of 68 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 1.58 · 38.2% (26 of 68 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 1.57 · 36.8% (25 of 68 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 1.44 · 52.9% (36 of 68 decks)
- Realm-Scorcher Hellkite relevance 1.32 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Mirrorworks relevance 1.54 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Efficient Construction relevance 1.95 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Bitter Reunion relevance 1.88 · 30.9% (21 of 68 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 1.69 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Rising of the Day relevance 1.40 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 1.30 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 2.02 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 1.90 · 39.7% (27 of 68 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 1.34 · 30.9% (21 of 68 decks)
All lands (4)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 1.63 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 1.63 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 1.45 · 29.4% (20 of 68 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 1.45 · 29.4% (20 of 68 decks)
EDH data for Prosperous Pirates: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 68 real decks.

































