Woodland Druid
Played in 325 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
63.2% Green
- Green 325 · 63.2%
- Selesnya 88 · 17.1%
- Golgari 53 · 10.3%
- Gruul 27 · 5.3%
- Other (6) 21 · 4.1%
All commanders (5)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 4.59 · 14.6% (223 of 1,531 decks)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 3.45 · 11.7% (71 of 609 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.28 · 12.7% (15 of 118 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.42 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 0.27 · 1.2% (1 of 85 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 3.44 · 53.8% (175 of 325 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 3.41 · 64.3% (209 of 325 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 3.37 · 67.7% (220 of 325 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 3.17 · 67.1% (218 of 325 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 3.10 · 57.5% (187 of 325 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 3.02 · 56.9% (185 of 325 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 2.99 · 59.4% (193 of 325 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.83 · 50.8% (165 of 325 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.72 · 52.9% (172 of 325 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.67 · 60.6% (197 of 325 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.59 · 49.2% (160 of 325 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.39 · 47.7% (155 of 325 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.37 · 63.1% (205 of 325 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.30 · 45.2% (147 of 325 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.26 · 62.2% (202 of 325 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.18 · 39.4% (128 of 325 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.17 · 38.2% (124 of 325 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.03 · 38.2% (124 of 325 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.01 · 33.5% (109 of 325 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.00 · 70.2% (228 of 325 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.00 · 32.0% (104 of 325 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.96 · 53.5% (174 of 325 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 1.90 · 30.8% (100 of 325 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 1.89 · 28.3% (92 of 325 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 1.79 · 52.9% (172 of 325 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.75 · 27.7% (90 of 325 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 1.75 · 26.5% (86 of 325 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.70 · 25.8% (84 of 325 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 1.64 · 27.7% (90 of 325 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.60 · 45.8% (149 of 325 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 3.44 · 53.8% (175 of 325 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 3.41 · 64.3% (209 of 325 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 3.37 · 67.7% (220 of 325 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 3.17 · 67.1% (218 of 325 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 3.10 · 57.5% (187 of 325 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 3.02 · 56.9% (185 of 325 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 2.99 · 59.4% (193 of 325 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.83 · 50.8% (165 of 325 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.72 · 52.9% (172 of 325 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.59 · 49.2% (160 of 325 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.39 · 47.7% (155 of 325 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.37 · 63.1% (205 of 325 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.30 · 45.2% (147 of 325 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.26 · 62.2% (202 of 325 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.18 · 39.4% (128 of 325 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.17 · 38.2% (124 of 325 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.03 · 38.2% (124 of 325 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.01 · 33.5% (109 of 325 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.00 · 70.2% (228 of 325 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.00 · 32.0% (104 of 325 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.96 · 53.5% (174 of 325 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 1.90 · 30.8% (100 of 325 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 1.89 · 28.3% (92 of 325 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 1.79 · 52.9% (172 of 325 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.75 · 27.7% (90 of 325 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 1.75 · 26.5% (86 of 325 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.70 · 25.8% (84 of 325 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 1.64 · 27.7% (90 of 325 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.60 · 45.8% (149 of 325 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 1.56 · 23.4% (76 of 325 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 1.51 · 41.2% (134 of 325 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.48 · 22.5% (73 of 325 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.43 · 22.2% (72 of 325 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.31 · 20.9% (68 of 325 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 1.31 · 37.2% (121 of 325 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 1.20 · 19.4% (63 of 325 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 1.12 · 19.4% (63 of 325 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.02 · 16.6% (54 of 325 decks)
- Memnite relevance 0.99 · 16.6% (54 of 325 decks)
- Village Elder relevance 0.93 · 14.5% (47 of 325 decks)
- Krosan Wayfarer relevance 0.86 · 18.5% (60 of 325 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.84 · 16.6% (54 of 325 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Hall of Triumph relevance 1.06 · 20.3% (66 of 325 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.87 · 24.9% (81 of 325 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.67 · 60.6% (197 of 325 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 1.53 · 34.2% (111 of 325 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 1.27 · 52.3% (170 of 325 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.97 · 31.4% (102 of 325 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.84 · 18.5% (60 of 325 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.90 · 35.4% (115 of 325 decks)
EDH data for Woodland Druid: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 325 real decks.