Woodland Druid
Played in 88 Selesnya decks
230+46+4+
Color Identity Spread
16.9% Selesnya
-
Green 331 · 63.4%
-
Selesnya 88 · 16.9%
-
Golgari 54 · 10.3%
-
Gruul 28 · 5.4%
- Other (6) 21 · 4.0%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Isamaru, Hound of Konda 67.0% of decks
Isamaru, Hound of Konda 67.0% of decks
Quakestrider Ceratops 69.3% of decks
Quakestrider Ceratops 69.3% of decks
Muraganda Petroglyphs 68.2% of decks
Muraganda Petroglyphs 68.2% of decks
Watchwolf 68.2% of decks
Watchwolf 68.2% of decks
Elite Vanguard 53.4% of decks
Elite Vanguard 53.4% of decks
Savannah Lions 62.5% of decks
Savannah Lions 62.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Jasmine Boreal of the Seven relevance 3.03 · 1.9% (80 of 4,210 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.98 · 5.6% (2 of 36 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 2.67 · 67.0% (59 of 88 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.67 · 69.3% (61 of 88 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.67 · 68.2% (60 of 88 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 2.63 · 68.2% (60 of 88 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 2.59 · 53.4% (47 of 88 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 2.48 · 62.5% (55 of 88 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.46 · 62.5% (55 of 88 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.45 · 63.6% (56 of 88 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.20 · 56.8% (50 of 88 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.16 · 53.4% (47 of 88 decks)
- Yoked Ox relevance 2.14 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 2.12 · 43.2% (38 of 88 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 2.06 · 48.9% (43 of 88 decks)
- Expedition Envoy relevance 2.05 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.96 · 40.9% (36 of 88 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.91 · 46.6% (41 of 88 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 1.88 · 43.2% (38 of 88 decks)
- Sanctuary Cat relevance 1.87 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 1.83 · 37.5% (33 of 88 decks)
- Memnite relevance 1.76 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 1.76 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.71 · 40.9% (36 of 88 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 1.66 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Kyoshi Warrior Guard relevance 1.65 · 27.3% (24 of 88 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.65 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 1.58 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 1.56 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 1.55 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.54 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 1.51 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
All creatures (46)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 2.67 · 67.0% (59 of 88 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.67 · 69.3% (61 of 88 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 2.63 · 68.2% (60 of 88 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 2.59 · 53.4% (47 of 88 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 2.48 · 62.5% (55 of 88 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.46 · 62.5% (55 of 88 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.45 · 63.6% (56 of 88 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.20 · 56.8% (50 of 88 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.16 · 53.4% (47 of 88 decks)
- Yoked Ox relevance 2.14 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 2.12 · 43.2% (38 of 88 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 2.06 · 48.9% (43 of 88 decks)
- Expedition Envoy relevance 2.05 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.96 · 40.9% (36 of 88 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.91 · 46.6% (41 of 88 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 1.88 · 43.2% (38 of 88 decks)
- Sanctuary Cat relevance 1.87 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 1.83 · 37.5% (33 of 88 decks)
- Memnite relevance 1.76 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 1.76 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.71 · 40.9% (36 of 88 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 1.66 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Kyoshi Warrior Guard relevance 1.65 · 27.3% (24 of 88 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.65 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 1.58 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 1.56 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 1.55 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.54 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 1.44 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 1.41 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.41 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 1.36 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Shepherd of the Flock // Usher to Safety relevance 1.35 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Armored Warhorse relevance 1.32 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.29 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Garenbrig Carver // Shield's Might relevance 1.28 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.27 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.26 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Dromoka Warrior relevance 1.25 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 1.23 · 27.3% (24 of 88 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 1.23 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 1.21 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Cliffhaven Sell-Sword relevance 1.20 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Silverflame Squire // On Alert relevance 1.20 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 1.18 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.15 · 25.0% (22 of 88 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.67 · 68.2% (60 of 88 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 1.51 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 1.43 · 47.7% (42 of 88 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 1.21 · 28.4% (25 of 88 decks)
EDH data for Woodland Druid: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 88 real decks.






















