Giant Adephage
Played in 1,837 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
5.7% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 2.84 · 8.8% (431 of 4,902 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 1.95 · 4.1% (299 of 7,284 decks)
- Volo, Guide to Monsters relevance 1.86 · 4.1% (230 of 5,584 decks)
- Ant-Man, Reformed Rogue relevance 1.44 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Alaundo the Seer relevance 1.34 · 3.8% (57 of 1,491 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 1.16 · 4.8% (23 of 478 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 1.04 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 1.02 · 2.5% (45 of 1,788 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.99 · 3.2% (25 of 774 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 0.98 · 4.0% (17 of 423 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.84 · 4.1% (11 of 271 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.83 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.82 · 1.6% (52 of 3,231 decks)
- Gandalf, Westward Voyager relevance 0.79 · 2.6% (17 of 654 decks)
- Shameless Charlatan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.77 · 7.1% (5 of 70 decks)
- Vannifar, Evolved Enigma relevance 0.75 · 1.9% (27 of 1,445 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Third Doctor relevance 0.75 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.57 · 1.1% (36 of 3,404 decks)
- Ant-Man, Colony Commander relevance 0.53 · 3.1% (5 of 162 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.52 · 1.3% (16 of 1,193 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.52 · 1.1% (21 of 1,833 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.50 · 1.2% (16 of 1,300 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.49 · 1.1% (18 of 1,586 decks)
- Radagast, Wizard of Wilds relevance 0.46 · 1.8% (7 of 393 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.45 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Kaseto, Orochi Archmage relevance 0.43 · 1.6% (7 of 440 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.40 · 1.6% (6 of 380 decks)
- Jackal, Genius Geneticist relevance 0.39 · 1.0% (11 of 1,053 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.37 · 1.3% (7 of 546 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.84 · 26.0% (478 of 1,837 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.78 · 33.6% (617 of 1,837 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.75 · 21.1% (387 of 1,837 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.75 · 26.9% (495 of 1,837 decks)
- Reef Worm relevance 0.75 · 20.4% (375 of 1,837 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.73 · 25.2% (463 of 1,837 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.71 · 21.2% (389 of 1,837 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.70 · 33.4% (614 of 1,837 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.69 · 24.8% (455 of 1,837 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.68 · 35.7% (656 of 1,837 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 0.67 · 19.2% (353 of 1,837 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.65 · 31.0% (569 of 1,837 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (343 of 1,837 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.62 · 32.0% (588 of 1,837 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.60 · 15.4% (282 of 1,837 decks)
- Theoretical Duplication relevance 0.59 · 13.7% (252 of 1,837 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.58 · 16.3% (300 of 1,837 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 0.58 · 13.6% (250 of 1,837 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.58 · 16.5% (304 of 1,837 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.56 · 16.8% (308 of 1,837 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.56 · 27.6% (507 of 1,837 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.54 · 18.0% (331 of 1,837 decks)
- They Came from the Pipes relevance 0.53 · 15.2% (279 of 1,837 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.52 · 12.2% (224 of 1,837 decks)
- Tendershoot Dryad relevance 0.52 · 12.8% (235 of 1,837 decks)
- Gruff Triplets relevance 0.51 · 11.3% (207 of 1,837 decks)
- Threats Around Every Corner relevance 0.51 · 13.8% (254 of 1,837 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.50 · 12.6% (232 of 1,837 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.50 · 13.7% (251 of 1,837 decks)
- Scroll of Fate relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (259 of 1,837 decks)
All creatures (26)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.84 · 26.0% (478 of 1,837 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.78 · 33.6% (617 of 1,837 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.75 · 21.1% (387 of 1,837 decks)
- Reef Worm relevance 0.75 · 20.4% (375 of 1,837 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.71 · 21.2% (389 of 1,837 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.70 · 33.4% (614 of 1,837 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.68 · 35.7% (656 of 1,837 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 0.67 · 19.2% (353 of 1,837 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.65 · 31.0% (569 of 1,837 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (343 of 1,837 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.62 · 32.0% (588 of 1,837 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 0.58 · 13.6% (250 of 1,837 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.58 · 16.5% (304 of 1,837 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.56 · 27.6% (507 of 1,837 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.54 · 18.0% (331 of 1,837 decks)
- Tendershoot Dryad relevance 0.52 · 12.8% (235 of 1,837 decks)
- Gruff Triplets relevance 0.51 · 11.3% (207 of 1,837 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.50 · 10.9% (201 of 1,837 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.49 · 15.8% (291 of 1,837 decks)
- Octomancer relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (267 of 1,837 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (297 of 1,837 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.48 · 14.2% (261 of 1,837 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.48 · 14.5% (266 of 1,837 decks)
- Curator Beastie relevance 0.47 · 12.6% (232 of 1,837 decks)
- Hydra Omnivore relevance 0.46 · 11.3% (208 of 1,837 decks)
- Bramble Sovereign relevance 0.46 · 9.6% (176 of 1,837 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.58 · 16.3% (300 of 1,837 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.56 · 16.8% (308 of 1,837 decks)
- Scroll of Fate relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (259 of 1,837 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.47 · 14.4% (264 of 1,837 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.60 · 15.4% (282 of 1,837 decks)
- They Came from the Pipes relevance 0.53 · 15.2% (279 of 1,837 decks)
- Threats Around Every Corner relevance 0.51 · 13.8% (254 of 1,837 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.50 · 12.6% (232 of 1,837 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.48 · 26.2% (482 of 1,837 decks)
- Trail of Mystery relevance 0.45 · 12.0% (221 of 1,837 decks)
All instants (5)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.73 · 25.2% (463 of 1,837 decks)
- Theoretical Duplication relevance 0.59 · 13.7% (252 of 1,837 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.50 · 13.7% (251 of 1,837 decks)
- Perplexing Test relevance 0.49 · 17.9% (328 of 1,837 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.49 · 17.9% (328 of 1,837 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.75 · 26.9% (495 of 1,837 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.69 · 24.8% (455 of 1,837 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.49 · 12.2% (225 of 1,837 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.48 · 14.8% (272 of 1,837 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.52 · 12.2% (224 of 1,837 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.59 · 31.4% (576 of 1,837 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.57 · 29.6% (543 of 1,837 decks)
All lands (2)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.54 · 33.7% (619 of 1,837 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.48 · 29.2% (536 of 1,837 decks)
EDH data for Giant Adephage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,837 real decks.