Giant Adephage
Played in 3,900 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
12.2% Gruul
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Raph & Mikey, Troublemakers relevance 3.25 · 17.8% (1,591 of 8,917 decks)
- Hans Eriksson relevance 2.99 · 38.9% (175 of 450 decks)
- Stonebrow, Krosan Hero relevance 2.57 · 40.2% (80 of 199 decks)
- Xenagos, God of Revels relevance 2.43 · 12.3% (598 of 4,847 decks)
- General Marhault Elsdragon relevance 1.96 · 13.5% (143 of 1,062 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 1.69 · 8.2% (213 of 2,613 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 1.61 · 8.4% (157 of 1,867 decks)
- Radha, Heir to Keld relevance 1.35 · 7.6% (86 of 1,137 decks)
- Svella, Ice Shaper relevance 1.22 · 6.2% (86 of 1,395 decks)
- Nikya of the Old Ways relevance 0.91 · 3.9% (72 of 1,834 decks)
- Raggadragga, Goreguts Boss relevance 0.73 · 2.4% (108 of 4,462 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.72 · 2.5% (95 of 3,810 decks)
- Borborygmos relevance 0.63 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Fugitive Doctor relevance 0.57 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Guild Artisan relevance 0.50 · 11.1% (3 of 27 decks)
- Grand Warlord Radha relevance 0.37 · 2.3% (11 of 473 decks)
- Anzrag, the Quake-Mole relevance 0.37 · 1.3% (39 of 2,962 decks)
- Neyith of the Dire Hunt relevance 0.35 · 1.7% (17 of 991 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.35 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Halana and Alena, Partners relevance 0.32 · 1.3% (29 of 2,316 decks)
- Alena, Kessig Trapper // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (4 of 111 decks)
- Alena, Kessig Trapper // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (6 of 248 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.29 · 1.6% (12 of 764 decks)
- Tavern Brawler // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (5 of 201 decks)
- Deathleaper, Terror Weapon relevance 0.25 · 1.7% (7 of 404 decks)
- Absorbing Man and Titania relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Yarus, Roar of the Old Gods relevance 0.24 · 1.0% (19 of 1,855 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Tavern Brawler relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (2 of 54 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.38 · 38.7% (1,509 of 3,900 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 1.12 · 34.7% (1,352 of 3,900 decks)
- Port Razer relevance 1.07 · 34.1% (1,328 of 3,900 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 1.05 · 26.8% (1,047 of 3,900 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.03 · 50.7% (1,976 of 3,900 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.98 · 34.1% (1,331 of 3,900 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 0.97 · 25.5% (995 of 3,900 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.96 · 51.5% (2,008 of 3,900 decks)
- Anzrag, the Quake-Mole relevance 0.93 · 36.6% (1,427 of 3,900 decks)
- Raphael, Tag Team Tough relevance 0.86 · 24.8% (968 of 3,900 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.86 · 38.1% (1,484 of 3,900 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.84 · 26.7% (1,041 of 3,900 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.80 · 41.9% (1,635 of 3,900 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.80 · 35.9% (1,401 of 3,900 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.78 · 21.5% (838 of 3,900 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.77 · 24.5% (956 of 3,900 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.76 · 24.3% (948 of 3,900 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.74 · 25.8% (1,006 of 3,900 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.73 · 16.0% (624 of 3,900 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.73 · 20.9% (817 of 3,900 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.71 · 22.9% (894 of 3,900 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 0.71 · 21.2% (826 of 3,900 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.69 · 19.9% (778 of 3,900 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 0.67 · 28.1% (1,097 of 3,900 decks)
- Scourge of the Throne relevance 0.67 · 21.0% (819 of 3,900 decks)
- Doors of Durin relevance 0.66 · 19.6% (763 of 3,900 decks)
- Raphael, the Nightwatcher relevance 0.66 · 16.6% (649 of 3,900 decks)
- Hydra Omnivore relevance 0.66 · 15.8% (615 of 3,900 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.64 · 20.6% (803 of 3,900 decks)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 0.64 · 14.6% (569 of 3,900 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.38 · 38.7% (1,509 of 3,900 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 1.12 · 34.7% (1,352 of 3,900 decks)
- Port Razer relevance 1.07 · 34.1% (1,328 of 3,900 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 1.05 · 26.8% (1,047 of 3,900 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.03 · 50.7% (1,976 of 3,900 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.98 · 34.1% (1,331 of 3,900 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 0.97 · 25.5% (995 of 3,900 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.96 · 51.5% (2,008 of 3,900 decks)
- Anzrag, the Quake-Mole relevance 0.93 · 36.6% (1,427 of 3,900 decks)
- Raphael, Tag Team Tough relevance 0.86 · 24.8% (968 of 3,900 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.86 · 38.1% (1,484 of 3,900 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.84 · 26.7% (1,041 of 3,900 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.80 · 41.9% (1,635 of 3,900 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.78 · 21.5% (838 of 3,900 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.77 · 24.5% (956 of 3,900 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.74 · 25.8% (1,006 of 3,900 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.73 · 16.0% (624 of 3,900 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.73 · 20.9% (817 of 3,900 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.71 · 22.9% (894 of 3,900 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 0.71 · 21.2% (826 of 3,900 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.69 · 19.9% (778 of 3,900 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 0.67 · 28.1% (1,097 of 3,900 decks)
- Scourge of the Throne relevance 0.67 · 21.0% (819 of 3,900 decks)
- Raphael, the Nightwatcher relevance 0.66 · 16.6% (649 of 3,900 decks)
- Hydra Omnivore relevance 0.66 · 15.8% (615 of 3,900 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.64 · 20.6% (803 of 3,900 decks)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 0.64 · 14.6% (569 of 3,900 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.63 · 19.9% (778 of 3,900 decks)
- Angrath's Marauders relevance 0.61 · 14.4% (563 of 3,900 decks)
- Bloodthirster relevance 0.61 · 17.1% (665 of 3,900 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.61 · 17.7% (689 of 3,900 decks)
- Savage Ventmaw relevance 0.61 · 25.7% (1,002 of 3,900 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.60 · 25.6% (999 of 3,900 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.60 · 17.7% (691 of 3,900 decks)
- Vaultborn Tyrant relevance 0.58 · 16.3% (634 of 3,900 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.58 · 17.2% (669 of 3,900 decks)
- Summon: Bahamut relevance 0.56 · 13.9% (544 of 3,900 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.54 · 18.9% (737 of 3,900 decks)
- Wulfgar of Icewind Dale relevance 0.53 · 16.8% (655 of 3,900 decks)
- Old Gnawbone relevance 0.52 · 20.5% (799 of 3,900 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Doors of Durin relevance 0.66 · 19.6% (763 of 3,900 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.58 · 31.6% (1,234 of 3,900 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.51 · 23.8% (927 of 3,900 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.80 · 35.9% (1,401 of 3,900 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.76 · 24.3% (948 of 3,900 decks)
- Full Throttle relevance 0.63 · 21.3% (831 of 3,900 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.61 · 19.3% (751 of 3,900 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.57 · 43.3% (1,687 of 3,900 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.55 · 21.6% (843 of 3,900 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.53 · 37.6% (1,466 of 3,900 decks)
EDH data for Giant Adephage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,900 real decks.