Might of Oaks
Played in 167 Temur decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.42 · 2.2% (1 of 45 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Become Immense relevance 2.09 · 45.5% (76 of 167 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 2.03 · 47.3% (79 of 167 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 1.99 · 47.9% (80 of 167 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 1.76 · 44.3% (74 of 167 decks)
- Brute Force relevance 1.65 · 35.9% (60 of 167 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 1.60 · 32.3% (54 of 167 decks)
- Groundswell relevance 1.54 · 32.9% (55 of 167 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 1.54 · 41.3% (69 of 167 decks)
- Colossal Might relevance 1.50 · 25.7% (43 of 167 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 1.49 · 32.3% (54 of 167 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 1.47 · 38.9% (65 of 167 decks)
- Temur Battle Rage relevance 1.46 · 43.7% (73 of 167 decks)
- Monstrous Rage relevance 1.45 · 29.9% (50 of 167 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 1.40 · 41.9% (70 of 167 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 1.37 · 40.1% (67 of 167 decks)
- Might of the Nephilim relevance 1.37 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 1.32 · 47.9% (80 of 167 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 1.28 · 47.9% (80 of 167 decks)
- Wild Defiance relevance 1.27 · 19.2% (32 of 167 decks)
- Get a Leg Up relevance 1.15 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Collision // Colossus relevance 1.12 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Mutagenic Growth relevance 1.10 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 1.07 · 26.3% (44 of 167 decks)
- Might of Old Krosa relevance 1.07 · 16.8% (28 of 167 decks)
- Zada, Hedron Grinder relevance 1.07 · 21.0% (35 of 167 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 1.01 · 25.7% (43 of 167 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 1.01 · 24.0% (40 of 167 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 1.00 · 19.8% (33 of 167 decks)
- Siege Smash relevance 0.99 · 20.4% (34 of 167 decks)
- Colossal Growth relevance 0.94 · 19.2% (32 of 167 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Zada, Hedron Grinder relevance 1.07 · 21.0% (35 of 167 decks)
- Kaseto, Orochi Archmage relevance 0.82 · 18.6% (31 of 167 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.60 · 26.3% (44 of 167 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.58 · 13.2% (22 of 167 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Wild Defiance relevance 1.27 · 19.2% (32 of 167 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 1.01 · 24.0% (40 of 167 decks)
- Shared Animosity relevance 0.64 · 18.0% (30 of 167 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.62 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
All instants (40)
- Become Immense relevance 2.09 · 45.5% (76 of 167 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 2.03 · 47.3% (79 of 167 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 1.99 · 47.9% (80 of 167 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 1.76 · 44.3% (74 of 167 decks)
- Brute Force relevance 1.65 · 35.9% (60 of 167 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 1.60 · 32.3% (54 of 167 decks)
- Groundswell relevance 1.54 · 32.9% (55 of 167 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 1.54 · 41.3% (69 of 167 decks)
- Colossal Might relevance 1.50 · 25.7% (43 of 167 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 1.49 · 32.3% (54 of 167 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 1.47 · 38.9% (65 of 167 decks)
- Temur Battle Rage relevance 1.46 · 43.7% (73 of 167 decks)
- Monstrous Rage relevance 1.45 · 29.9% (50 of 167 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 1.40 · 41.9% (70 of 167 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 1.37 · 40.1% (67 of 167 decks)
- Might of the Nephilim relevance 1.37 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 1.32 · 47.9% (80 of 167 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 1.28 · 47.9% (80 of 167 decks)
- Get a Leg Up relevance 1.15 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Collision // Colossus relevance 1.12 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Mutagenic Growth relevance 1.10 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 1.07 · 26.3% (44 of 167 decks)
- Might of Old Krosa relevance 1.07 · 16.8% (28 of 167 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 1.01 · 25.7% (43 of 167 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 1.00 · 19.8% (33 of 167 decks)
- Siege Smash relevance 0.99 · 20.4% (34 of 167 decks)
- Colossal Growth relevance 0.94 · 19.2% (32 of 167 decks)
- Titan's Strength relevance 0.94 · 19.8% (33 of 167 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.83 · 19.2% (32 of 167 decks)
- Unleash Fury relevance 0.81 · 18.0% (30 of 167 decks)
- Boon of Boseiju relevance 0.78 · 12.6% (21 of 167 decks)
- Infuriate relevance 0.74 · 12.6% (21 of 167 decks)
- Dreadmaw's Ire relevance 0.72 · 13.2% (22 of 167 decks)
- Soul's Fire relevance 0.67 · 16.2% (27 of 167 decks)
- Antagonize relevance 0.64 · 9.6% (16 of 167 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.63 · 26.3% (44 of 167 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.61 · 30.5% (51 of 167 decks)
- Temur Charm relevance 0.61 · 18.0% (30 of 167 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.59 · 37.1% (62 of 167 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.59 · 31.1% (52 of 167 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.60 · 29.9% (50 of 167 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.58 · 29.9% (50 of 167 decks)
EDH data for Might of Oaks: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 167 real decks.