Might of Oaks
Played in 97 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (3)
- Raised by Giants // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 2.30 · 8.7% (9 of 104 decks)
- Kaseto, Orochi Archmage relevance 2.02 · 2.8% (12 of 430 decks)
- Feywild Visitor // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.60 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Titanic Growth relevance 2.25 · 37.1% (36 of 97 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 2.08 · 42.3% (41 of 97 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 1.75 · 27.8% (27 of 97 decks)
- Groundswell relevance 1.71 · 25.8% (25 of 97 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 1.60 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 1.29 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 1.11 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Boon of Boseiju relevance 0.99 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.93 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.83 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Stormchaser Drake relevance 0.83 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.80 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.78 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.78 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Hunter's Prowess relevance 0.76 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.75 · 25.8% (25 of 97 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.74 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.72 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.71 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 0.71 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 0.70 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.70 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.69 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.69 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Boar Umbra relevance 0.69 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.68 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Increasing Savagery relevance 0.66 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.66 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Glistener Elf relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.63 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Stormchaser Drake relevance 0.83 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Glistener Elf relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Viridian Corrupter relevance 0.61 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.60 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Orvar, the All-Form relevance 0.57 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 0.47 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.43 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
All enchantments (15)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.72 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.71 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.69 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.69 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Boar Umbra relevance 0.69 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.66 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.61 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.59 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.56 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.52 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.51 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.42 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.42 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
All instants (20)
- Titanic Growth relevance 2.25 · 37.1% (36 of 97 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 2.08 · 42.3% (41 of 97 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 1.75 · 27.8% (27 of 97 decks)
- Groundswell relevance 1.71 · 25.8% (25 of 97 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 1.60 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 1.29 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 1.11 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Boon of Boseiju relevance 0.99 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.93 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.83 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.78 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.75 · 25.8% (25 of 97 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.74 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 0.71 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 0.70 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.70 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.68 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Choose Your Weapon relevance 0.60 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.49 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.42 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.80 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.78 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Hunter's Prowess relevance 0.76 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Increasing Savagery relevance 0.66 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.63 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Exponential Growth relevance 0.51 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.49 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.43 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
EDH data for Might of Oaks: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 97 real decks.