Might of Oaks
Played in 87 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (2)
- Rafiq of the Many relevance 2.77 · 2.0% (47 of 2,380 decks)
- Ragnar relevance 0.41 · 1.0% (1 of 96 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Qasali Pridemage relevance 1.73 · 39.1% (34 of 87 decks)
- Finest Hour relevance 1.50 · 42.5% (37 of 87 decks)
- Sublime Archangel relevance 1.44 · 31.0% (27 of 87 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 1.41 · 21.8% (19 of 87 decks)
- Giltspire Avenger relevance 1.20 · 25.3% (22 of 87 decks)
- Sovereigns of Lost Alara relevance 1.17 · 26.4% (23 of 87 decks)
- Rancor relevance 1.14 · 32.2% (28 of 87 decks)
- Steel of the Godhead relevance 1.01 · 26.4% (23 of 87 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.96 · 27.6% (24 of 87 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 0.94 · 24.1% (21 of 87 decks)
- Dueling Grounds relevance 0.88 · 17.2% (15 of 87 decks)
- Stoic Angel relevance 0.85 · 18.4% (16 of 87 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.84 · 12.6% (11 of 87 decks)
- Spirit Mantle relevance 0.81 · 19.5% (17 of 87 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.81 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
- Battlegrace Angel relevance 0.79 · 16.1% (14 of 87 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.79 · 17.2% (15 of 87 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.78 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
- Ardent Plea relevance 0.77 · 14.9% (13 of 87 decks)
- Armadillo Cloak relevance 0.75 · 17.2% (15 of 87 decks)
- Angelic Benediction relevance 0.72 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
- Ethercaste Knight relevance 0.72 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.69 · 10.3% (9 of 87 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.68 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
- Noble Hierarch relevance 0.66 · 48.3% (42 of 87 decks)
- Knight of Glory relevance 0.66 · 12.6% (11 of 87 decks)
- Aven Squire relevance 0.66 · 12.6% (11 of 87 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.65 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
- Bastion Protector relevance 0.63 · 12.6% (11 of 87 decks)
- Sram, Senior Edificer relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (14 of 87 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Qasali Pridemage relevance 1.73 · 39.1% (34 of 87 decks)
- Sublime Archangel relevance 1.44 · 31.0% (27 of 87 decks)
- Giltspire Avenger relevance 1.20 · 25.3% (22 of 87 decks)
- Sovereigns of Lost Alara relevance 1.17 · 26.4% (23 of 87 decks)
- Stoic Angel relevance 0.85 · 18.4% (16 of 87 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.84 · 12.6% (11 of 87 decks)
- Battlegrace Angel relevance 0.79 · 16.1% (14 of 87 decks)
- Ethercaste Knight relevance 0.72 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
- Noble Hierarch relevance 0.66 · 48.3% (42 of 87 decks)
- Knight of Glory relevance 0.66 · 12.6% (11 of 87 decks)
- Aven Squire relevance 0.66 · 12.6% (11 of 87 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.65 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
- Bastion Protector relevance 0.63 · 12.6% (11 of 87 decks)
- Sram, Senior Edificer relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (14 of 87 decks)
- Sigiled Paladin relevance 0.61 · 11.5% (10 of 87 decks)
- Akrasan Squire relevance 0.60 · 11.5% (10 of 87 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 0.56 · 14.9% (13 of 87 decks)
- Rhox Charger relevance 0.54 · 9.2% (8 of 87 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.54 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.57 · 41.4% (36 of 87 decks)
- Behemoth Sledge relevance 0.56 · 12.6% (11 of 87 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.56 · 11.5% (10 of 87 decks)
All enchantments (16)
- Finest Hour relevance 1.50 · 42.5% (37 of 87 decks)
- Rancor relevance 1.14 · 32.2% (28 of 87 decks)
- Steel of the Godhead relevance 1.01 · 26.4% (23 of 87 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.96 · 27.6% (24 of 87 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 0.94 · 24.1% (21 of 87 decks)
- Dueling Grounds relevance 0.88 · 17.2% (15 of 87 decks)
- Spirit Mantle relevance 0.81 · 19.5% (17 of 87 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.79 · 17.2% (15 of 87 decks)
- Ardent Plea relevance 0.77 · 14.9% (13 of 87 decks)
- Armadillo Cloak relevance 0.75 · 17.2% (15 of 87 decks)
- Angelic Benediction relevance 0.72 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.58 · 10.3% (9 of 87 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.56 · 12.6% (11 of 87 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.55 · 16.1% (14 of 87 decks)
- Favor of the Overbeing relevance 0.54 · 10.3% (9 of 87 decks)
- Idolized relevance 0.50 · 10.3% (9 of 87 decks)
All instants (10)
- Invigorate relevance 1.41 · 21.8% (19 of 87 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.81 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.78 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.69 · 10.3% (9 of 87 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.68 · 13.8% (12 of 87 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.61 · 11.5% (10 of 87 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.59 · 12.6% (11 of 87 decks)
- Selesnya Charm relevance 0.54 · 9.2% (8 of 87 decks)
- Bant Charm relevance 0.52 · 16.1% (14 of 87 decks)
- Hindering Light relevance 0.52 · 11.5% (10 of 87 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Cathedral of War relevance 1.33 · 28.7% (25 of 87 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.59 · 27.6% (24 of 87 decks)
EDH data for Might of Oaks: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 87 real decks.