Concerted Defense
Played in 232 Blue decks
1630+1+49+
Color Identity Spread
4.2% Blue
Commanders
The Destined Thief 22.0% of decks
The Destined Thief 22.0% of decks
Katara, Waterbending Master 1.4% of decks
Katara, Waterbending Master 1.4% of decks
Mistform Ultimus 4.4% of decks
Mistform Ultimus 4.4% of decks
Ertai, Wizard Adept 3.8% of decks
Ertai, Wizard Adept 3.8% of decks
Adric, Mathematical Genius 20.0% of decks
Adric, Mathematical Genius 20.0% of decks
Haldan, Avid Arcanist 16.7% of decks
Haldan, Avid Arcanist 16.7% of decks
Most Relevant
Spell Pierce 45.3% of decks
Spell Pierce 45.3% of decks
Annul 27.2% of decks
Annul 27.2% of decks
Disrupt 19.8% of decks
Disrupt 19.8% of decks
Force Spike 16.4% of decks
Force Spike 16.4% of decks
Clash of Wills 15.1% of decks
Clash of Wills 15.1% of decks
Dispel 30.2% of decks
Dispel 30.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (16)
- The Destined Thief relevance 2.55 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Katara, Waterbending Master relevance 1.64 · 1.4% (34 of 2,447 decks)
- Mistform Ultimus relevance 1.30 · 4.4% (6 of 137 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.88 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.66 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Haldan, Avid Arcanist relevance 0.63 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Justice, Vance Astrovik relevance 0.52 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.50 · 1.3% (2 of 151 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.45 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.41 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.41 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Inga Rune-Eyes relevance 0.36 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.32 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Vendilion Clique relevance 0.31 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.30 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
- Stature, Size Shifter relevance 0.29 · 1.1% (1 of 93 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Spell Pierce relevance 1.08 · 45.3% (105 of 232 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.00 · 27.2% (63 of 232 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.91 · 19.8% (46 of 232 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.83 · 16.4% (38 of 232 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 0.83 · 15.1% (35 of 232 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.78 · 30.2% (70 of 232 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 0.77 · 14.7% (34 of 232 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.75 · 20.3% (47 of 232 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 0.69 · 11.2% (26 of 232 decks)
- Condescend relevance 0.68 · 14.2% (33 of 232 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.67 · 20.7% (48 of 232 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.67 · 22.8% (53 of 232 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.67 · 21.6% (50 of 232 decks)
- Censor relevance 0.66 · 12.1% (28 of 232 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 0.65 · 12.5% (29 of 232 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.64 · 16.4% (38 of 232 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.63 · 12.5% (29 of 232 decks)
- Ceremonious Rejection relevance 0.62 · 9.1% (21 of 232 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.59 · 13.8% (32 of 232 decks)
- Cursecatcher relevance 0.59 · 13.4% (31 of 232 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.56 · 13.4% (31 of 232 decks)
- Stern Dismissal relevance 0.55 · 11.2% (26 of 232 decks)
- Intervene relevance 0.55 · 9.5% (22 of 232 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.55 · 12.9% (30 of 232 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 0.54 · 9.5% (22 of 232 decks)
- Convolute relevance 0.54 · 10.3% (24 of 232 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.52 · 16.4% (38 of 232 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 0.52 · 9.5% (22 of 232 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.51 · 15.9% (37 of 232 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.51 · 12.1% (28 of 232 decks)
All creatures (1)
- Cursecatcher relevance 0.59 · 13.4% (31 of 232 decks)
All instants (49)
- Spell Pierce relevance 1.08 · 45.3% (105 of 232 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.00 · 27.2% (63 of 232 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.91 · 19.8% (46 of 232 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.83 · 16.4% (38 of 232 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 0.83 · 15.1% (35 of 232 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.78 · 30.2% (70 of 232 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 0.77 · 14.7% (34 of 232 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.75 · 20.3% (47 of 232 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 0.69 · 11.2% (26 of 232 decks)
- Condescend relevance 0.68 · 14.2% (33 of 232 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.67 · 20.7% (48 of 232 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.67 · 22.8% (53 of 232 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.67 · 21.6% (50 of 232 decks)
- Censor relevance 0.66 · 12.1% (28 of 232 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 0.65 · 12.5% (29 of 232 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.64 · 16.4% (38 of 232 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.63 · 12.5% (29 of 232 decks)
- Ceremonious Rejection relevance 0.62 · 9.1% (21 of 232 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.59 · 13.8% (32 of 232 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.56 · 13.4% (31 of 232 decks)
- Stern Dismissal relevance 0.55 · 11.2% (26 of 232 decks)
- Intervene relevance 0.55 · 9.5% (22 of 232 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.55 · 12.9% (30 of 232 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 0.54 · 9.5% (22 of 232 decks)
- Convolute relevance 0.54 · 10.3% (24 of 232 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.52 · 16.4% (38 of 232 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 0.52 · 9.5% (22 of 232 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.51 · 15.9% (37 of 232 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.51 · 12.1% (28 of 232 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 0.50 · 9.5% (22 of 232 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.49 · 12.5% (29 of 232 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.49 · 13.8% (32 of 232 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.48 · 11.2% (26 of 232 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.48 · 15.5% (36 of 232 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.47 · 14.7% (34 of 232 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.47 · 20.7% (48 of 232 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 0.47 · 9.1% (21 of 232 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.43 · 11.6% (27 of 232 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.43 · 12.5% (29 of 232 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.43 · 16.4% (38 of 232 decks)
- Dazzling Denial relevance 0.43 · 9.1% (21 of 232 decks)
- Deprive relevance 0.43 · 9.1% (21 of 232 decks)
- Envelop relevance 0.43 · 6.5% (15 of 232 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (24 of 232 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 0.42 · 6.9% (16 of 232 decks)
- Bar the Gate relevance 0.42 · 6.5% (15 of 232 decks)
- Abjure relevance 0.42 · 13.4% (31 of 232 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.42 · 17.2% (40 of 232 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 0.41 · 7.3% (17 of 232 decks)
EDH data for Concerted Defense: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 232 real decks.



























