Cards like Quickling
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards like Mystical Tutor
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Essence Flux
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Essence Flux 33%
- Planar Incision 19%
- Teferi's Time Twist 11%
- Spaceshift 1%
Cards like Cryptic Command
3.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
4.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cloud of Faeries
5.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cloud of Faeries 35%
- Peregrine Drake 20%
- Great Whale 5%
- Palinchron 4%
Cards like Force of Will
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Will 30%
- Force of Negation 23%
Cards like Glen Elendra Guardian
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Faerie Slumber Party
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Archaeomancer
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Scrivener
Cards like Baral, Chief of Compliance
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Evacuation
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 33%
- Mystic Remora 30%
Cards like Dig Through Time
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Dig Through Time 19%
- Impulse 13%
- Anticipate 3%
- Telling Time 1%
- Experimental Augury 1%
Cards like Glen Elendra Archmage
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Narset's Reversal
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards
- Narset's Reversal 26%
- Twincast 5%
- Insidious Will 4%
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Bident of Thassa
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like High Fae Trickster
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Swan Song
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 31%
- Strix Serenade 13%
Cards like Displacer Kitten
14× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Crystal Shard
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Crystal Shard 15%
- Erratic Portal 4%
Cards like Gitaxian Probe
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Gitaxian Probe 24%
- Peek 3%
- Sorcerous Sight 1%
- Clairvoyance 1%
All top picks (50)
- Mistbind Clique relevance 0.63 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Tunnel Vision relevance 0.53 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.54 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.45 · 40.0% (32 of 80 decks)
- Quickling relevance 0.50 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Harbinger relevance 0.53 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.40 · 45.0% (36 of 80 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.37 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Impostor relevance 0.47 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Talion's Messenger relevance 0.48 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Swarm relevance 0.47 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Glen Elendra Pranksters relevance 0.45 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.39 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Formation relevance 0.42 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 0.38 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.34 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.35 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.27 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Knacksaw Clique relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.30 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.35 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Malleable Impostor relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Shadow Puppeteers relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Hypnotic Sprite // Mesmeric Glare relevance 0.35 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.29 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 0.33 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Spell Stutter relevance 0.38 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.32 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 0.35 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Slumber Party relevance 0.34 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Trickery relevance 0.37 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.29 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.27 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Fencer Clique relevance 0.40 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.28 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Artisans relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.26 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.31 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Cloudseeder relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Inspired Sprite relevance 0.35 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Mocking Sprite relevance 0.27 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.26 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Pestermite relevance 0.33 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.21 · 43.8% (35 of 80 decks)
- Illusion Spinners relevance 0.34 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.25 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.22 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Mistbind Clique relevance 0.63 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.54 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.45 · 40.0% (32 of 80 decks)
- Quickling relevance 0.50 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Harbinger relevance 0.53 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.40 · 45.0% (36 of 80 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.37 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Impostor relevance 0.47 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Talion's Messenger relevance 0.48 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Swarm relevance 0.47 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Glen Elendra Pranksters relevance 0.45 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Formation relevance 0.42 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 0.38 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.34 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.27 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Knacksaw Clique relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.30 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.35 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Malleable Impostor relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Shadow Puppeteers relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Hypnotic Sprite // Mesmeric Glare relevance 0.35 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.29 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 0.33 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.29 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.27 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Fencer Clique relevance 0.40 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Artisans relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.26 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Cloudseeder relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Inspired Sprite relevance 0.35 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Mocking Sprite relevance 0.27 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.26 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Pestermite relevance 0.33 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Illusion Spinners relevance 0.34 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.22 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.20 · 45.0% (36 of 80 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.25 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.18 · 52.5% (42 of 80 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Sprite Noble relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Flitterwing Nuisance relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.25 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Glamermite relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.21 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Nightveil Sprite relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Picklock Prankster // Free the Fae relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Smirking Spelljacker relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Il Mheg Pixie relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.28 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.31 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.25 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Robe of the Archmagi relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Runechanter's Pike relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.24 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Glasses of Urza relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.20 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.16 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Golden Argosy relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.14 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Aether Vial relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.14 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.14 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Rimefire Torque relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.16 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.14 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.10 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.12 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.13 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Empyrial Plate relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.06 · 70.0% (56 of 80 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.12 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.12 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Umezawa's Jitte relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Dawn-Blessed Pennant relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Hand of Vecna relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.11 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.35 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.32 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.28 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.23 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Favorable Winds relevance 0.21 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Stormchaser's Talent relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Cunning Evasion relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Exchange of Words relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.19 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Feywild Visitor relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.16 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.11 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Ashiok's Erasure relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.14 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.14 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Treachery relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.10 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Hive Mind relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.11 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Tolarian Contempt relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Monastery Siege relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Confounding Conundrum relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Gravitational Shift relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.08 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
All instants (50)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.39 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Spell Stutter relevance 0.38 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Trickery relevance 0.37 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.21 · 43.8% (35 of 80 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.25 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Spell Crumple relevance 0.29 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.23 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Hinder relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.21 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.20 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- This Town Ain't Big Enough relevance 0.28 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Curfew relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.22 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.16 · 48.8% (39 of 80 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.24 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.22 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.22 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Memory Deluge relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.20 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.22 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Geistwave relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.19 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.19 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Decoy Gambit relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.17 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.22 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.18 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.16 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Faebloom Trick relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.15 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.17 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- String of Disappearances relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.15 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Vapor Snag relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.12 · 48.8% (39 of 80 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.19 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Aether Tradewinds relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.19 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Alchemist's Retrieval relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Glen Elendra's Answer relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.19 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Echoing Truth relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Peel from Reality relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Tunnel Vision relevance 0.53 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 0.35 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Slumber Party relevance 0.34 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Stolen by the Fae relevance 0.30 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.24 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.20 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.18 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.21 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.18 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.17 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Day's Undoing relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Mists of Lórien relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.16 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.13 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.12 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.16 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.13 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Arcane Heist relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Telemin Performance relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.14 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Fantastic Elasticity relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Voidwalk relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Eagle Vision relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Shifting Grift relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Drawn from Dreams relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Call to Mind relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Birthday Escape relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Paradigm Shift relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.21 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.18 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.12 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.26 · 58.8% (47 of 80 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.40 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.20 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.17 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Petrified Hamlet relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.14 · 46.3% (37 of 80 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 46.3% (37 of 80 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.18 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.20 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.15 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.15 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.18 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.16 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.18 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 76.3% (61 of 80 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Memorial to Genius relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.12 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.14 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.13 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.13 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.12 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.12 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Moonring Island relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.11 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.11 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.10 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.06 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
All lands (23)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.17 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.17 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.17 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.15 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.17 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.16 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Dowsing Dagger // Lost Vale relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.09 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.07 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.08 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.08 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 86.3% (69 of 80 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Vendilion Clique, from 80 real Commander decks.