Concerted Defense
Played in 172 Azorius decks
630+6+2+41+1+
Color Identity Spread
3.1% Azorius
Commanders
Linvala, Shield of Sea Gate 22.3% of decks
Linvala, Shield of Sea Gate 22.3% of decks
Noble Heritage // Volo, Itinerant Scholar 3.8% of decks
Noble Heritage // Volo, Itinerant Scholar 3.8% of decks
Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Folk Hero 1.5% of decks
Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Folk Hero 1.5% of decks
Shameless Charlatan // Abdel Adrian, Gorion's Ward 7.1% of decks
Shameless Charlatan // Abdel Adrian, Gorion's Ward 7.1% of decks
Lae'zel, Vlaakith's Champion // Candlekeep Sage 2.3% of decks
Lae'zel, Vlaakith's Champion // Candlekeep Sage 2.3% of decks
Pippin, Guard of the Citadel 1.1% of decks
Pippin, Guard of the Citadel 1.1% of decks
Most Relevant
Clash of Wills 40.1% of decks
Clash of Wills 40.1% of decks
Spoils of Adventure 32.6% of decks
Spoils of Adventure 32.6% of decks
Circular Logic 36.6% of decks
Circular Logic 36.6% of decks
Complicate 30.2% of decks
Complicate 30.2% of decks
Disciple of the Ring 29.1% of decks
Disciple of the Ring 29.1% of decks
Contradict 27.3% of decks
Contradict 27.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Linvala, Shield of Sea Gate relevance 3.51 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.97 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Folk Hero relevance 0.96 · 1.5% (5 of 327 decks)
- Shameless Charlatan // Abdel Adrian, Gorion's Ward relevance 0.57 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Lae'zel, Vlaakith's Champion // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.42 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Pippin, Guard of the Citadel relevance 0.33 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Clash of Wills relevance 2.54 · 40.1% (69 of 172 decks)
- Spoils of Adventure relevance 2.18 · 32.6% (56 of 172 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 2.00 · 36.6% (63 of 172 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.98 · 30.2% (52 of 172 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 1.85 · 29.1% (50 of 172 decks)
- Contradict relevance 1.80 · 27.3% (47 of 172 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.78 · 28.5% (49 of 172 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 1.76 · 30.8% (53 of 172 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 1.73 · 33.1% (57 of 172 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.73 · 28.5% (49 of 172 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 1.70 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 1.70 · 28.5% (49 of 172 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 1.70 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Countermand relevance 1.69 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Don't Make a Sound relevance 1.69 · 32.6% (56 of 172 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.68 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Daze relevance 1.68 · 36.0% (62 of 172 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 1.68 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.64 · 27.3% (47 of 172 decks)
- Collective Restraint relevance 1.63 · 30.2% (52 of 172 decks)
- Convolute relevance 1.62 · 28.5% (49 of 172 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 1.62 · 25.6% (44 of 172 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 1.62 · 23.8% (41 of 172 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 1.60 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.58 · 33.1% (57 of 172 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 1.57 · 23.8% (41 of 172 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 1.57 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 1.57 · 27.9% (48 of 172 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 1.56 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 1.56 · 27.3% (47 of 172 decks)
All creatures (6)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 1.85 · 29.1% (50 of 172 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 1.57 · 23.8% (41 of 172 decks)
- Cursecatcher relevance 1.50 · 25.6% (44 of 172 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 1.49 · 23.3% (40 of 172 decks)
- Chancellor of the Annex relevance 1.46 · 27.9% (48 of 172 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 1.43 · 20.9% (36 of 172 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Collective Restraint relevance 1.63 · 30.2% (52 of 172 decks)
- Cowed by Wisdom relevance 1.48 · 21.5% (37 of 172 decks)
All instants (41)
- Clash of Wills relevance 2.54 · 40.1% (69 of 172 decks)
- Spoils of Adventure relevance 2.18 · 32.6% (56 of 172 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 2.00 · 36.6% (63 of 172 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.98 · 30.2% (52 of 172 decks)
- Contradict relevance 1.80 · 27.3% (47 of 172 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.78 · 28.5% (49 of 172 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 1.76 · 30.8% (53 of 172 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 1.73 · 33.1% (57 of 172 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.73 · 28.5% (49 of 172 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 1.70 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 1.70 · 28.5% (49 of 172 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 1.70 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Countermand relevance 1.69 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Don't Make a Sound relevance 1.69 · 32.6% (56 of 172 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.68 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Daze relevance 1.68 · 36.0% (62 of 172 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 1.68 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.64 · 27.3% (47 of 172 decks)
- Convolute relevance 1.62 · 28.5% (49 of 172 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 1.62 · 25.6% (44 of 172 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 1.62 · 23.8% (41 of 172 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 1.60 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.58 · 33.1% (57 of 172 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 1.57 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 1.57 · 27.9% (48 of 172 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 1.56 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 1.56 · 27.3% (47 of 172 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 1.56 · 22.7% (39 of 172 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 1.55 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 1.54 · 27.3% (47 of 172 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 1.52 · 22.7% (39 of 172 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.50 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Confound relevance 1.49 · 30.2% (52 of 172 decks)
- Aether Spike relevance 1.47 · 26.7% (46 of 172 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.47 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 1.47 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 1.44 · 22.7% (39 of 172 decks)
- Desertion relevance 1.43 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Abjure relevance 1.43 · 27.3% (47 of 172 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.43 · 32.6% (56 of 172 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.42 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Compelling Argument relevance 1.42 · 20.9% (36 of 172 decks)
EDH data for Concerted Defense: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 172 real decks.


























