Quirion Explorer
Played in 55 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
2.5% Selesnya
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (5)
- Kellan, Daring Traveler // Journey On relevance 0.92 · 1.1% (3 of 283 decks)
- Chorus of the Conclave relevance 0.91 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 0.74 · 1.1% (2 of 180 decks)
- Lila, Hospitality Hostess relevance 0.59 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Daughter of Autumn relevance 0.54 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
All most relevant (26)
- Quirion Elves relevance 2.14 · 36.4% (20 of 55 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.33 · 36.4% (20 of 55 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 1.26 · 29.1% (16 of 55 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 1.14 · 20.0% (11 of 55 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.88 · 21.8% (12 of 55 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.79 · 36.4% (20 of 55 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.77 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.74 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.68 · 23.6% (13 of 55 decks)
- Selvala, Explorer Returned relevance 0.68 · 23.6% (13 of 55 decks)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.67 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.65 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.62 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.60 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.58 · 38.2% (21 of 55 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (11 of 55 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.54 · 30.9% (17 of 55 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.54 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.54 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.51 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.50 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.49 · 25.5% (14 of 55 decks)
- Camaraderie relevance 0.36 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.34 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.31 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.30 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Quirion Elves relevance 2.14 · 36.4% (20 of 55 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.33 · 36.4% (20 of 55 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 1.26 · 29.1% (16 of 55 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 1.14 · 20.0% (11 of 55 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.88 · 21.8% (12 of 55 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.79 · 36.4% (20 of 55 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.77 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.74 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.68 · 23.6% (13 of 55 decks)
- Selvala, Explorer Returned relevance 0.68 · 23.6% (13 of 55 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.65 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.62 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.60 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.58 · 38.2% (21 of 55 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (11 of 55 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.54 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.54 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.51 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.50 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.49 · 25.5% (14 of 55 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.67 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.34 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.31 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.54 · 30.9% (17 of 55 decks)
- Camaraderie relevance 0.36 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.30 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.36 · 23.6% (13 of 55 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.31 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
EDH data for Quirion Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 55 real decks.