Quirion Explorer
Played in 46 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (2)
- Treva, the Renewer relevance 1.48 · 1.9% (5 of 263 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.69 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
All most relevant (29)
- Quirion Elves relevance 2.45 · 39.1% (18 of 46 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 1.37 · 37.0% (17 of 46 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 1.10 · 19.6% (9 of 46 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.09 · 30.4% (14 of 46 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.06 · 30.4% (14 of 46 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.05 · 56.5% (26 of 46 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.04 · 37.0% (17 of 46 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.02 · 28.3% (13 of 46 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.93 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.90 · 41.3% (19 of 46 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.85 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.73 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.71 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.70 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.67 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.65 · 19.6% (9 of 46 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.59 · 30.4% (14 of 46 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.58 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.53 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.50 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.48 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.45 · 26.1% (12 of 46 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 0.43 · 21.7% (10 of 46 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.42 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.42 · 26.1% (12 of 46 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.39 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.34 · 19.6% (9 of 46 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.33 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.32 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Quirion Elves relevance 2.45 · 39.1% (18 of 46 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 1.37 · 37.0% (17 of 46 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 1.10 · 19.6% (9 of 46 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.09 · 30.4% (14 of 46 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.06 · 30.4% (14 of 46 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.05 · 56.5% (26 of 46 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.04 · 37.0% (17 of 46 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.02 · 28.3% (13 of 46 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.93 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.90 · 41.3% (19 of 46 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.85 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.73 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.71 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.67 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.65 · 19.6% (9 of 46 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.59 · 30.4% (14 of 46 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.58 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.53 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.48 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.45 · 26.1% (12 of 46 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 0.43 · 21.7% (10 of 46 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.33 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.32 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.70 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.50 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.42 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.34 · 19.6% (9 of 46 decks)
All instants (1)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.39 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.42 · 26.1% (12 of 46 decks)
All lands (3)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.53 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.50 · 21.7% (10 of 46 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.40 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
EDH data for Quirion Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 46 real decks.