Quirion Explorer
Played in 255 Golgari decks
Color Identity Spread
11.8% Golgari
All commanders (4)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 1.74 · 1.6% (20 of 1,224 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.89 · 2.4% (3 of 125 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 0.63 · 1.6% (2 of 124 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.38 · 1.5% (1 of 68 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Quirion Elves relevance 3.05 · 61.2% (156 of 255 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 1.97 · 50.2% (128 of 255 decks)
- Leaf Gilder relevance 1.62 · 30.2% (77 of 255 decks)
- Heart Warden relevance 1.58 · 25.1% (64 of 255 decks)
- Wirewood Elf relevance 1.56 · 25.1% (64 of 255 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 1.55 · 33.3% (85 of 255 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 1.37 · 31.0% (79 of 255 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.28 · 63.5% (162 of 255 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.21 · 59.2% (151 of 255 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 1.21 · 22.4% (57 of 255 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 1.18 · 18.8% (48 of 255 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 1.15 · 21.6% (55 of 255 decks)
- Overgrown Zealot relevance 1.12 · 19.6% (50 of 255 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.07 · 31.8% (81 of 255 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.00 · 39.2% (100 of 255 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.96 · 19.2% (49 of 255 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.95 · 22.7% (58 of 255 decks)
- Viridian Shaman relevance 0.93 · 15.3% (39 of 255 decks)
- Elfhame Druid relevance 0.92 · 14.1% (36 of 255 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.90 · 34.1% (87 of 255 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.87 · 25.9% (66 of 255 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.85 · 44.7% (114 of 255 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.83 · 12.2% (31 of 255 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.82 · 17.3% (44 of 255 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.82 · 37.3% (95 of 255 decks)
- Llanowar Dead relevance 0.81 · 16.1% (41 of 255 decks)
- Werebear relevance 0.80 · 12.2% (31 of 255 decks)
- Elvish Regrower relevance 0.79 · 18.4% (47 of 255 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.78 · 16.1% (41 of 255 decks)
- Woodland Mystic relevance 0.78 · 11.8% (30 of 255 decks)
All creatures (43)
- Quirion Elves relevance 3.05 · 61.2% (156 of 255 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 1.97 · 50.2% (128 of 255 decks)
- Leaf Gilder relevance 1.62 · 30.2% (77 of 255 decks)
- Heart Warden relevance 1.58 · 25.1% (64 of 255 decks)
- Wirewood Elf relevance 1.56 · 25.1% (64 of 255 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 1.55 · 33.3% (85 of 255 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 1.37 · 31.0% (79 of 255 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.28 · 63.5% (162 of 255 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.21 · 59.2% (151 of 255 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 1.21 · 22.4% (57 of 255 decks)
- Overgrown Zealot relevance 1.12 · 19.6% (50 of 255 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.07 · 31.8% (81 of 255 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.00 · 39.2% (100 of 255 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.95 · 22.7% (58 of 255 decks)
- Viridian Shaman relevance 0.93 · 15.3% (39 of 255 decks)
- Elfhame Druid relevance 0.92 · 14.1% (36 of 255 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.90 · 34.1% (87 of 255 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.87 · 25.9% (66 of 255 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.85 · 44.7% (114 of 255 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.83 · 12.2% (31 of 255 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.82 · 17.3% (44 of 255 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.82 · 37.3% (95 of 255 decks)
- Llanowar Dead relevance 0.81 · 16.1% (41 of 255 decks)
- Werebear relevance 0.80 · 12.2% (31 of 255 decks)
- Elvish Regrower relevance 0.79 · 18.4% (47 of 255 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.78 · 16.1% (41 of 255 decks)
- Woodland Mystic relevance 0.78 · 11.8% (30 of 255 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.78 · 14.5% (37 of 255 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 0.76 · 28.6% (73 of 255 decks)
- Wose Pathfinder relevance 0.75 · 12.5% (32 of 255 decks)
- Intrepid Stablemaster relevance 0.74 · 11.4% (29 of 255 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.74 · 27.5% (70 of 255 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.74 · 23.5% (60 of 255 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.74 · 27.8% (71 of 255 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.73 · 25.5% (65 of 255 decks)
- Sylvan Messenger relevance 0.73 · 16.5% (42 of 255 decks)
- Bloodline Shaman relevance 0.72 · 10.6% (27 of 255 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.71 · 19.6% (50 of 255 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elder relevance 0.71 · 12.2% (31 of 255 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.71 · 29.0% (74 of 255 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.71 · 20.8% (53 of 255 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.67 · 38.8% (99 of 255 decks)
- Skemfar Shadowsage relevance 0.66 · 22.7% (58 of 255 decks)
All instants (5)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 1.15 · 21.6% (55 of 255 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.96 · 19.2% (49 of 255 decks)
- Unlikely Aid relevance 0.68 · 10.2% (26 of 255 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 0.67 · 9.8% (25 of 255 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.67 · 26.7% (68 of 255 decks)
EDH data for Quirion Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 255 real decks.