Borderland Explorer
Played in 185 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (13)
- Shizuko, Caller of Autumn relevance 1.28 · 4.1% (5 of 122 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.14 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Sasaya, Orochi Ascendant // Sasaya's Essence relevance 1.06 · 1.1% (8 of 715 decks)
- Iwamori of the Open Fist relevance 0.67 · 2.3% (2 of 87 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Master Chef relevance 0.57 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart relevance 0.56 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Kurbis, Harvest Celebrant relevance 0.43 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Captain Kathryn Janeway relevance 0.38 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.37 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.37 · 1.5% (1 of 68 decks)
- M'Baku, Jabari Chieftain relevance 0.35 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
- Masumaro, First to Live relevance 0.35 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.33 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Civic Wayfinder relevance 0.73 · 11.9% (22 of 185 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 0.70 · 12.4% (23 of 185 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.70 · 16.8% (31 of 185 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.66 · 13.5% (25 of 185 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.66 · 19.5% (36 of 185 decks)
- District Guide relevance 0.63 · 9.7% (18 of 185 decks)
- Borderland Ranger relevance 0.62 · 10.3% (19 of 185 decks)
- Greenseeker relevance 0.61 · 10.3% (19 of 185 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 0.60 · 9.7% (18 of 185 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.58 · 22.7% (42 of 185 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.57 · 12.4% (23 of 185 decks)
- Avatar of Growth relevance 0.57 · 9.7% (18 of 185 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.55 · 11.4% (21 of 185 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.53 · 23.2% (43 of 185 decks)
- Beast-Kin Ranger relevance 0.52 · 8.6% (16 of 185 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 0.51 · 10.8% (20 of 185 decks)
- Dawn's Light Archer relevance 0.51 · 9.2% (17 of 185 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.51 · 13.0% (24 of 185 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.50 · 30.3% (56 of 185 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.50 · 13.5% (25 of 185 decks)
- Elvish Vanguard relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (18 of 185 decks)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (16 of 185 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.49 · 10.3% (19 of 185 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.48 · 15.1% (28 of 185 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.47 · 12.4% (23 of 185 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.47 · 13.0% (24 of 185 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.46 · 29.2% (54 of 185 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.46 · 11.9% (22 of 185 decks)
- Elderleaf Mentor relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (13 of 185 decks)
- Elfhame Druid relevance 0.45 · 8.1% (15 of 185 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Civic Wayfinder relevance 0.73 · 11.9% (22 of 185 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 0.70 · 12.4% (23 of 185 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.70 · 16.8% (31 of 185 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.66 · 19.5% (36 of 185 decks)
- District Guide relevance 0.63 · 9.7% (18 of 185 decks)
- Borderland Ranger relevance 0.62 · 10.3% (19 of 185 decks)
- Greenseeker relevance 0.61 · 10.3% (19 of 185 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 0.60 · 9.7% (18 of 185 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.58 · 22.7% (42 of 185 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.57 · 12.4% (23 of 185 decks)
- Avatar of Growth relevance 0.57 · 9.7% (18 of 185 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.55 · 11.4% (21 of 185 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.53 · 23.2% (43 of 185 decks)
- Beast-Kin Ranger relevance 0.52 · 8.6% (16 of 185 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 0.51 · 10.8% (20 of 185 decks)
- Dawn's Light Archer relevance 0.51 · 9.2% (17 of 185 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.51 · 13.0% (24 of 185 decks)
- Elvish Vanguard relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (18 of 185 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.49 · 10.3% (19 of 185 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.48 · 15.1% (28 of 185 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.47 · 13.0% (24 of 185 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.46 · 29.2% (54 of 185 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.46 · 11.9% (22 of 185 decks)
- Elderleaf Mentor relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (13 of 185 decks)
- Elfhame Druid relevance 0.45 · 8.1% (15 of 185 decks)
- Drove of Elves relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (17 of 185 decks)
- Elvish Eulogist relevance 0.44 · 6.5% (12 of 185 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (17 of 185 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.43 · 12.4% (23 of 185 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.43 · 11.4% (21 of 185 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (25 of 185 decks)
- Elvish Clancaller relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (15 of 185 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.41 · 9.7% (18 of 185 decks)
- Allosaurus Rider relevance 0.40 · 7.0% (13 of 185 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.39 · 8.1% (15 of 185 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.39 · 15.1% (28 of 185 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.38 · 21.1% (39 of 185 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.38 · 13.5% (25 of 185 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.38 · 9.2% (17 of 185 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (11 of 185 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (15 of 185 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (16 of 185 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.47 · 12.4% (23 of 185 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.38 · 16.2% (30 of 185 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.66 · 13.5% (25 of 185 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.50 · 30.3% (56 of 185 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.50 · 13.5% (25 of 185 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.41 · 17.3% (32 of 185 decks)
- New Frontiers relevance 0.40 · 6.5% (12 of 185 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.39 · 11.9% (22 of 185 decks)
EDH data for Borderland Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 185 real decks.