Borderland Explorer
Played in 237 Golgari decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (7)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 2.22 · 2.4% (29 of 1,222 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 1.59 · 1.8% (13 of 723 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 1.35 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Kagha, Shadow Archdruid relevance 0.85 · 1.2% (4 of 343 decks)
- Criminal Past // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.76 · 2.9% (2 of 68 decks)
- Bortuk Bonerattle relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Viconia, Drow Apostate // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.43 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.84 · 24.9% (59 of 237 decks)
- Glowspore Shaman relevance 0.83 · 19.0% (45 of 237 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 0.78 · 12.7% (30 of 237 decks)
- Greenseeker relevance 0.77 · 11.8% (28 of 237 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 0.76 · 11.4% (27 of 237 decks)
- Eclipsed Elf relevance 0.69 · 21.5% (51 of 237 decks)
- Dawnhand Eulogist relevance 0.65 · 15.2% (36 of 237 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.65 · 19.0% (45 of 237 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.63 · 9.7% (23 of 237 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.61 · 13.1% (31 of 237 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.60 · 17.7% (42 of 237 decks)
- Lys Alana Informant relevance 0.60 · 13.1% (31 of 237 decks)
- Koma's Faithful relevance 0.57 · 8.9% (21 of 237 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.54 · 27.0% (64 of 237 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (26 of 237 decks)
- Llanowar Dead relevance 0.53 · 10.5% (25 of 237 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (22 of 237 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.52 · 19.8% (47 of 237 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.52 · 25.3% (60 of 237 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.52 · 21.1% (50 of 237 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.51 · 19.0% (45 of 237 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.51 · 23.2% (55 of 237 decks)
- Elderfang Ritualist relevance 0.51 · 11.0% (26 of 237 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.50 · 18.1% (43 of 237 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.50 · 18.6% (44 of 237 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.50 · 8.9% (21 of 237 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (22 of 237 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.48 · 19.0% (45 of 237 decks)
- Elvish Dreadlord relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (25 of 237 decks)
- Elvish Eulogist relevance 0.48 · 7.6% (18 of 237 decks)
All creatures (43)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.84 · 24.9% (59 of 237 decks)
- Glowspore Shaman relevance 0.83 · 19.0% (45 of 237 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 0.78 · 12.7% (30 of 237 decks)
- Greenseeker relevance 0.77 · 11.8% (28 of 237 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 0.76 · 11.4% (27 of 237 decks)
- Eclipsed Elf relevance 0.69 · 21.5% (51 of 237 decks)
- Dawnhand Eulogist relevance 0.65 · 15.2% (36 of 237 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.65 · 19.0% (45 of 237 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.61 · 13.1% (31 of 237 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.60 · 17.7% (42 of 237 decks)
- Lys Alana Informant relevance 0.60 · 13.1% (31 of 237 decks)
- Koma's Faithful relevance 0.57 · 8.9% (21 of 237 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.54 · 27.0% (64 of 237 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (26 of 237 decks)
- Llanowar Dead relevance 0.53 · 10.5% (25 of 237 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (22 of 237 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.52 · 19.8% (47 of 237 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.52 · 25.3% (60 of 237 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.52 · 21.1% (50 of 237 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.51 · 19.0% (45 of 237 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.51 · 23.2% (55 of 237 decks)
- Elderfang Ritualist relevance 0.51 · 11.0% (26 of 237 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.50 · 18.1% (43 of 237 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.50 · 18.6% (44 of 237 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.50 · 8.9% (21 of 237 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (22 of 237 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.48 · 19.0% (45 of 237 decks)
- Elvish Dreadlord relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (25 of 237 decks)
- Elvish Eulogist relevance 0.48 · 7.6% (18 of 237 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.47 · 11.4% (27 of 237 decks)
- Elderfang Disciple relevance 0.47 · 8.4% (20 of 237 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 0.47 · 15.6% (37 of 237 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.46 · 16.5% (39 of 237 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.46 · 9.7% (23 of 237 decks)
- Eyeblight Cullers relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (21 of 237 decks)
- Citanul Stalwart relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (18 of 237 decks)
- Blanchwood Prowler relevance 0.45 · 8.4% (20 of 237 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (40 of 237 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (22 of 237 decks)
- Blightsoil Druid relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (18 of 237 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.43 · 14.8% (35 of 237 decks)
- Llanowar Mentor relevance 0.42 · 7.6% (18 of 237 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.42 · 13.5% (32 of 237 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Prowess of the Fair relevance 0.43 · 14.3% (34 of 237 decks)
- Morcant's Eyes relevance 0.43 · 11.4% (27 of 237 decks)
All instants (2)
- Grisly Salvage relevance 0.44 · 16.9% (40 of 237 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.44 · 13.1% (31 of 237 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.63 · 9.7% (23 of 237 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (24 of 237 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.45 · 28.7% (68 of 237 decks)
EDH data for Borderland Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 237 real decks.