Borderland Explorer
Played in 111 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (2)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.81 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.70 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.79 · 13.5% (15 of 111 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 0.79 · 11.7% (13 of 111 decks)
- Eclipsed Elf relevance 0.76 · 21.6% (24 of 111 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.75 · 24.3% (27 of 111 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 0.71 · 10.8% (12 of 111 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 0.71 · 18.9% (21 of 111 decks)
- Morcant's Eyes relevance 0.69 · 18.9% (21 of 111 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.68 · 22.5% (25 of 111 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.68 · 29.7% (33 of 111 decks)
- Deathbloom Ritualist relevance 0.68 · 17.1% (19 of 111 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.67 · 11.7% (13 of 111 decks)
- Moon-Vigil Adherents relevance 0.67 · 16.2% (18 of 111 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.61 · 11.7% (13 of 111 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.60 · 21.6% (24 of 111 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.60 · 27.0% (30 of 111 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.59 · 40.5% (45 of 111 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.57 · 16.2% (18 of 111 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.57 · 9.0% (10 of 111 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.56 · 12.6% (14 of 111 decks)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.55 · 19.8% (22 of 111 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 0.54 · 10.8% (12 of 111 decks)
- Greenseeker relevance 0.53 · 8.1% (9 of 111 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.53 · 13.5% (15 of 111 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.53 · 22.5% (25 of 111 decks)
- Lys Alana Dignitary relevance 0.53 · 12.6% (14 of 111 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.52 · 13.5% (15 of 111 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.52 · 16.2% (18 of 111 decks)
- Citanul Stalwart relevance 0.52 · 8.1% (9 of 111 decks)
- Llanowar Mentor relevance 0.51 · 9.9% (11 of 111 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.51 · 20.7% (23 of 111 decks)
All creatures (47)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.79 · 13.5% (15 of 111 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 0.79 · 11.7% (13 of 111 decks)
- Eclipsed Elf relevance 0.76 · 21.6% (24 of 111 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.75 · 24.3% (27 of 111 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 0.71 · 10.8% (12 of 111 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 0.71 · 18.9% (21 of 111 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.68 · 22.5% (25 of 111 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.68 · 29.7% (33 of 111 decks)
- Deathbloom Ritualist relevance 0.68 · 17.1% (19 of 111 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.67 · 11.7% (13 of 111 decks)
- Moon-Vigil Adherents relevance 0.67 · 16.2% (18 of 111 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.61 · 11.7% (13 of 111 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.60 · 21.6% (24 of 111 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.60 · 27.0% (30 of 111 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.59 · 40.5% (45 of 111 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.57 · 16.2% (18 of 111 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.56 · 12.6% (14 of 111 decks)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.55 · 19.8% (22 of 111 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 0.54 · 10.8% (12 of 111 decks)
- Greenseeker relevance 0.53 · 8.1% (9 of 111 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.53 · 13.5% (15 of 111 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.53 · 22.5% (25 of 111 decks)
- Lys Alana Dignitary relevance 0.53 · 12.6% (14 of 111 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.52 · 13.5% (15 of 111 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.52 · 16.2% (18 of 111 decks)
- Citanul Stalwart relevance 0.52 · 8.1% (9 of 111 decks)
- Llanowar Mentor relevance 0.51 · 9.9% (11 of 111 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.51 · 20.7% (23 of 111 decks)
- Gloom Ripper relevance 0.50 · 11.7% (13 of 111 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.50 · 27.9% (31 of 111 decks)
- Glamermite relevance 0.49 · 12.6% (14 of 111 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.49 · 21.6% (24 of 111 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.48 · 8.1% (9 of 111 decks)
- Glowspore Shaman relevance 0.47 · 9.9% (11 of 111 decks)
- Viconia, Drow Apostate relevance 0.47 · 8.1% (9 of 111 decks)
- Dawnhand Dissident relevance 0.47 · 10.8% (12 of 111 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.47 · 11.7% (13 of 111 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.47 · 8.1% (9 of 111 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.46 · 8.1% (9 of 111 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.46 · 14.4% (16 of 111 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 0.46 · 14.4% (16 of 111 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.46 · 16.2% (18 of 111 decks)
- Kagha, Shadow Archdruid relevance 0.45 · 11.7% (13 of 111 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.44 · 14.4% (16 of 111 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.43 · 18.9% (21 of 111 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.43 · 9.0% (10 of 111 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.43 · 16.2% (18 of 111 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Morcant's Eyes relevance 0.69 · 18.9% (21 of 111 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.57 · 9.0% (10 of 111 decks)
- Trystan's Command relevance 0.50 · 14.4% (16 of 111 decks)
EDH data for Borderland Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 111 real decks.