Tidal Bore
Played in 365 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
8.7% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (13)
- Alaundo the Seer relevance 2.68 · 4.5% (67 of 1,491 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.39 · 2.2% (109 of 4,945 decks)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 2.09 · 3.4% (35 of 1,035 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 1.87 · 2.7% (30 of 1,096 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 1.30 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.14 · 1.4% (13 of 913 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 1.11 · 11.1% (3 of 27 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.98 · 18.2% (2 of 11 decks)
- The Third Doctor // Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.70 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher // Hardy Outlander relevance 0.70 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.59 · 1.3% (3 of 223 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.44 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Kianne, Dean of Substance // Imbraham, Dean of Theory relevance 0.29 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 1.46 · 42.5% (155 of 365 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 1.42 · 23.6% (86 of 365 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 1.37 · 31.2% (114 of 365 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 1.32 · 32.9% (120 of 365 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 1.27 · 26.3% (96 of 365 decks)
- Gush relevance 1.26 · 27.4% (100 of 365 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.25 · 29.0% (106 of 365 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 1.24 · 22.7% (83 of 365 decks)
- Capsize relevance 1.23 · 24.9% (91 of 365 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 1.22 · 26.8% (98 of 365 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 1.21 · 28.2% (103 of 365 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.19 · 26.6% (97 of 365 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 1.18 · 25.8% (94 of 365 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 1.18 · 35.9% (131 of 365 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 1.15 · 35.1% (128 of 365 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.10 · 49.3% (180 of 365 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 1.06 · 23.3% (85 of 365 decks)
- High Tide relevance 1.03 · 25.8% (94 of 365 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.98 · 31.8% (116 of 365 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.97 · 20.3% (74 of 365 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.96 · 29.0% (106 of 365 decks)
- Salvager of Secrets relevance 0.96 · 14.8% (54 of 365 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.93 · 28.2% (103 of 365 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.92 · 27.9% (102 of 365 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.92 · 18.1% (66 of 365 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.90 · 15.3% (56 of 365 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.88 · 17.8% (65 of 365 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.87 · 18.1% (66 of 365 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.86 · 19.7% (72 of 365 decks)
- Tragic Lesson relevance 0.86 · 13.2% (48 of 365 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 1.46 · 42.5% (155 of 365 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 1.42 · 23.6% (86 of 365 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 1.37 · 31.2% (114 of 365 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 1.32 · 32.9% (120 of 365 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.25 · 29.0% (106 of 365 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 1.22 · 26.8% (98 of 365 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 1.21 · 28.2% (103 of 365 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 1.18 · 25.8% (94 of 365 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 1.15 · 35.1% (128 of 365 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 1.06 · 23.3% (85 of 365 decks)
- Salvager of Secrets relevance 0.96 · 14.8% (54 of 365 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.93 · 28.2% (103 of 365 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.92 · 18.1% (66 of 365 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.88 · 17.8% (65 of 365 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.78 · 26.8% (98 of 365 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.75 · 18.1% (66 of 365 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.72 · 17.0% (62 of 365 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.72 · 35.6% (130 of 365 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.72 · 17.8% (65 of 365 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.92 · 27.9% (102 of 365 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Lignify relevance 0.84 · 20.0% (73 of 365 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.73 · 29.0% (106 of 365 decks)
All instants (24)
- Gush relevance 1.26 · 27.4% (100 of 365 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 1.24 · 22.7% (83 of 365 decks)
- Capsize relevance 1.23 · 24.9% (91 of 365 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.19 · 26.6% (97 of 365 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 1.18 · 35.9% (131 of 365 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.10 · 49.3% (180 of 365 decks)
- High Tide relevance 1.03 · 25.8% (94 of 365 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.98 · 31.8% (116 of 365 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.97 · 20.3% (74 of 365 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.96 · 29.0% (106 of 365 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.90 · 15.3% (56 of 365 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.86 · 19.7% (72 of 365 decks)
- Tragic Lesson relevance 0.86 · 13.2% (48 of 365 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.86 · 21.4% (78 of 365 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.85 · 18.1% (66 of 365 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.85 · 16.4% (60 of 365 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.84 · 20.8% (76 of 365 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.84 · 18.4% (67 of 365 decks)
- Blink of an Eye relevance 0.83 · 15.6% (57 of 365 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.79 · 15.3% (56 of 365 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.77 · 32.9% (120 of 365 decks)
- Twiddle relevance 0.74 · 11.8% (43 of 365 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.74 · 15.9% (58 of 365 decks)
- Dream's Grip relevance 0.71 · 10.4% (38 of 365 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 1.27 · 26.3% (96 of 365 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.87 · 18.1% (66 of 365 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.80 · 19.2% (70 of 365 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 1.06 · 47.9% (175 of 365 decks)
EDH data for Tidal Bore: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 365 real decks.