Charging Cinderhorn
Played in 108 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (3)
- Alena, Kessig Trapper // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.74 · 1.8% (2 of 110 decks)
- Absorbing Man and Titania relevance 0.66 · 1.3% (2 of 158 decks)
- Ellie, Brick Master // Abby, Merciless Soldier relevance 0.41 · 1.2% (1 of 85 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.95 · 30.6% (33 of 108 decks)
- Harsh Mentor relevance 0.80 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Rubblehulk relevance 0.78 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Wrecking Ogre relevance 0.77 · 11.1% (12 of 108 decks)
- Archetype of Aggression relevance 0.73 · 20.4% (22 of 108 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 0.72 · 11.1% (12 of 108 decks)
- Khenra Charioteer relevance 0.70 · 14.8% (16 of 108 decks)
- Magebane Lizard relevance 0.68 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.67 · 17.6% (19 of 108 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.67 · 23.1% (25 of 108 decks)
- Burning-Tree Shaman relevance 0.67 · 11.1% (12 of 108 decks)
- Warmonger Hellkite relevance 0.67 · 10.2% (11 of 108 decks)
- Sunder Shaman relevance 0.66 · 14.8% (16 of 108 decks)
- Nikya of the Old Ways relevance 0.65 · 14.8% (16 of 108 decks)
- Scytheclaw Raptor relevance 0.65 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.65 · 26.9% (29 of 108 decks)
- Molten Primordial relevance 0.64 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.63 · 16.7% (18 of 108 decks)
- Drumhunter relevance 0.62 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.62 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.60 · 19.4% (21 of 108 decks)
- Sunspine Lynx relevance 0.60 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Immolation Shaman relevance 0.59 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Brutalizer Exarch relevance 0.59 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Radha, Heir to Keld relevance 0.57 · 16.7% (18 of 108 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.56 · 29.6% (32 of 108 decks)
- Abzan Beastmaster relevance 0.56 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Grand Warlord Radha relevance 0.55 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.55 · 18.5% (20 of 108 decks)
- Champion of the Path relevance 0.54 · 10.2% (11 of 108 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.95 · 30.6% (33 of 108 decks)
- Harsh Mentor relevance 0.80 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Rubblehulk relevance 0.78 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Wrecking Ogre relevance 0.77 · 11.1% (12 of 108 decks)
- Archetype of Aggression relevance 0.73 · 20.4% (22 of 108 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 0.72 · 11.1% (12 of 108 decks)
- Khenra Charioteer relevance 0.70 · 14.8% (16 of 108 decks)
- Magebane Lizard relevance 0.68 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.67 · 17.6% (19 of 108 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.67 · 23.1% (25 of 108 decks)
- Burning-Tree Shaman relevance 0.67 · 11.1% (12 of 108 decks)
- Warmonger Hellkite relevance 0.67 · 10.2% (11 of 108 decks)
- Sunder Shaman relevance 0.66 · 14.8% (16 of 108 decks)
- Nikya of the Old Ways relevance 0.65 · 14.8% (16 of 108 decks)
- Scytheclaw Raptor relevance 0.65 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.65 · 26.9% (29 of 108 decks)
- Molten Primordial relevance 0.64 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.63 · 16.7% (18 of 108 decks)
- Drumhunter relevance 0.62 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.62 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.60 · 19.4% (21 of 108 decks)
- Sunspine Lynx relevance 0.60 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Immolation Shaman relevance 0.59 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Brutalizer Exarch relevance 0.59 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Radha, Heir to Keld relevance 0.57 · 16.7% (18 of 108 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.56 · 29.6% (32 of 108 decks)
- Abzan Beastmaster relevance 0.56 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Grand Warlord Radha relevance 0.55 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.55 · 18.5% (20 of 108 decks)
- Champion of the Path relevance 0.54 · 10.2% (11 of 108 decks)
- Stalking Vengeance relevance 0.54 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.54 · 25.9% (28 of 108 decks)
- Scab-Clan Berserker relevance 0.53 · 8.3% (9 of 108 decks)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.52 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Creeping Trailblazer relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (9 of 108 decks)
- Molder Slug relevance 0.51 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Zo-Zu the Punisher relevance 0.50 · 8.3% (9 of 108 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.49 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Ogre Battledriver relevance 0.48 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Phytotitan relevance 0.47 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.47 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.47 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.45 · 14.8% (16 of 108 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.45 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Cindervines relevance 0.46 · 13.0% (14 of 108 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Domri, Anarch of Bolas relevance 0.46 · 19.4% (21 of 108 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Kazandu Refuge relevance 0.58 · 16.7% (18 of 108 decks)
- Skarrg, the Rage Pits relevance 0.45 · 18.5% (20 of 108 decks)
All lands (1)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.53 · 23.1% (25 of 108 decks)
EDH data for Charging Cinderhorn: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 108 real decks.