Charging Cinderhorn
Played in 38 Temur decks
Color Identity Spread
Most Relevant
All most relevant (30)
- Champion of the Path relevance 2.06 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Chandra's Embercat relevance 2.04 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 1.87 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.78 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Brighthearth Banneret relevance 1.76 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 1.70 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Smokebraider relevance 1.67 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Leafkin Avenger relevance 1.63 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 1.54 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 1.52 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Creeping Trailblazer relevance 1.31 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 1.31 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.30 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 1.29 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Flamebraider relevance 1.29 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Overgrowth Elemental relevance 1.28 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 1.25 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 1.20 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Ashling's Command relevance 1.17 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.16 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Eclipsed Flamekin relevance 1.14 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Ashling, Rekindled // Ashling, Rimebound relevance 1.12 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 1.11 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.01 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.93 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 0.92 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.68 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.62 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.42 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.38 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Champion of the Path relevance 2.06 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Chandra's Embercat relevance 2.04 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 1.87 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.78 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Brighthearth Banneret relevance 1.76 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 1.70 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Smokebraider relevance 1.67 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Leafkin Avenger relevance 1.63 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 1.54 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 1.52 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Creeping Trailblazer relevance 1.31 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 1.31 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.30 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 1.29 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Flamebraider relevance 1.29 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Overgrowth Elemental relevance 1.28 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 1.25 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 1.20 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.16 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Eclipsed Flamekin relevance 1.14 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Ashling, Rekindled // Ashling, Rimebound relevance 1.12 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 1.11 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.01 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.93 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 0.92 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.68 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.62 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.42 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.38 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
All instants (1)
- Ashling's Command relevance 1.17 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.97 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
EDH data for Charging Cinderhorn: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 38 real decks.