Charging Cinderhorn
Played in 52 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
130+24+3+4+2+3+2+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.56 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Captain Lannery Storm relevance 1.20 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Phoenix Chick relevance 1.18 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Depthshaker Titan relevance 1.17 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Dreadhorde Butcher relevance 1.10 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Loyal Apprentice relevance 1.06 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Reckless Fireweaver relevance 0.95 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Magda, the Hoardmaster relevance 0.95 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Urabrask's Forge relevance 0.93 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Laelia, the Blade Reforged relevance 0.89 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Rankle and Torbran relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Humble Defector relevance 0.82 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Gingerbrute relevance 0.80 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Hellkite Tyrant relevance 0.80 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Tempt with Vengeance relevance 0.80 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.80 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Hideous Taskmaster relevance 0.79 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Ingenious Artillerist relevance 0.79 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Lavaleaper relevance 0.78 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Weftstalker Ardent relevance 0.71 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 0.70 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Crime Novelist relevance 0.69 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.66 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Rain of Riches relevance 0.61 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.58 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Professional Face-Breaker relevance 0.57 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Kardur, Doomscourge relevance 0.56 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.55 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.53 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.52 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Mirkwood Bats relevance 0.45 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Captain Lannery Storm relevance 1.20 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Phoenix Chick relevance 1.18 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Depthshaker Titan relevance 1.17 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Dreadhorde Butcher relevance 1.10 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Loyal Apprentice relevance 1.06 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Reckless Fireweaver relevance 0.95 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Magda, the Hoardmaster relevance 0.95 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Laelia, the Blade Reforged relevance 0.89 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Rankle and Torbran relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Humble Defector relevance 0.82 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Gingerbrute relevance 0.80 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Hellkite Tyrant relevance 0.80 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.80 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Hideous Taskmaster relevance 0.79 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Ingenious Artillerist relevance 0.79 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Lavaleaper relevance 0.78 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Weftstalker Ardent relevance 0.71 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Crime Novelist relevance 0.69 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Professional Face-Breaker relevance 0.57 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Kardur, Doomscourge relevance 0.56 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.52 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Mirkwood Bats relevance 0.45 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.34 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.31 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Urabrask's Forge relevance 0.93 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.66 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.55 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Pain for All relevance 0.70 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Rain of Riches relevance 0.61 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.53 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.33 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
All instants (2)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.58 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.37 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Tempt with Vengeance relevance 0.80 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.39 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.36 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.43 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.32 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
All lands (2)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.54 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.30 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
EDH data for Charging Cinderhorn: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 52 real decks.






































