Lose Focus
Played in 1,564 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 2.65 · 9.3% (305 of 3,267 decks)
- Grandmother Goby relevance 2.63 · 18.6% (89 of 478 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 1.34 · 2.5% (197 of 7,914 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 1.08 · 3.9% (28 of 712 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.99 · 2.1% (74 of 3,538 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.96 · 2.0% (74 of 3,741 decks)
- Katara, Waterbending Master relevance 0.93 · 2.2% (53 of 2,454 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.91 · 3.3% (21 of 634 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.87 · 2.2% (38 of 1,704 decks)
- Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.74 · 4.9% (7 of 143 decks)
- Hydro-Man, Fluid Felon relevance 0.66 · 3.5% (8 of 230 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.65 · 1.7% (23 of 1,354 decks)
- The Wondrous Wasp relevance 0.64 · 18.2% (2 of 11 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.56 · 2.0% (11 of 541 decks)
- Saruman the White relevance 0.51 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 0.50 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Errant, Street Artist relevance 0.49 · 2.9% (5 of 172 decks)
- Imoen, Mystic Trickster // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.48 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Svyelun of Sea and Sky relevance 0.47 · 1.4% (12 of 831 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.45 · 1.5% (10 of 668 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.41 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.39 · 1.4% (8 of 590 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (3 of 107 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.35 · 1.9% (4 of 206 decks)
- Kiora, the Rising Tide relevance 0.34 · 1.9% (4 of 216 decks)
- The Lord of the Eagles relevance 0.34 · 1.1% (8 of 718 decks)
- Esior, Wardwing Familiar // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 0.32 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Jacob Hauken, Inspector // Hauken's Insight relevance 0.31 · 1.0% (7 of 672 decks)
- Valeria Richards, Precocious relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (2 of 71 decks)
- Mr. Spock, Science Officer relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mana Leak relevance 1.39 · 47.7% (746 of 1,564 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 1.14 · 47.7% (746 of 1,564 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 1.11 · 34.4% (538 of 1,564 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.97 · 27.5% (430 of 1,564 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.95 · 25.4% (397 of 1,564 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.84 · 32.2% (503 of 1,564 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.80 · 16.0% (250 of 1,564 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.79 · 18.5% (290 of 1,564 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 0.73 · 13.9% (217 of 1,564 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.70 · 21.7% (339 of 1,564 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.67 · 13.3% (208 of 1,564 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.67 · 18.0% (281 of 1,564 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.67 · 19.2% (300 of 1,564 decks)
- Logic Knot relevance 0.61 · 10.9% (170 of 1,564 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.60 · 19.4% (303 of 1,564 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.59 · 18.5% (289 of 1,564 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.58 · 24.0% (376 of 1,564 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.58 · 25.8% (404 of 1,564 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.56 · 22.8% (356 of 1,564 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.55 · 21.2% (331 of 1,564 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.54 · 27.9% (437 of 1,564 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.54 · 18.4% (287 of 1,564 decks)
- Mists of Lórien relevance 0.51 · 11.1% (173 of 1,564 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.50 · 16.4% (257 of 1,564 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 0.49 · 11.4% (178 of 1,564 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.49 · 32.4% (507 of 1,564 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.48 · 13.0% (203 of 1,564 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.48 · 13.5% (211 of 1,564 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.48 · 28.5% (446 of 1,564 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (172 of 1,564 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.56 · 22.8% (356 of 1,564 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.48 · 28.5% (446 of 1,564 decks)
- Malevolent Hermit // Benevolent Geist relevance 0.45 · 11.9% (186 of 1,564 decks)
- Guile relevance 0.44 · 10.5% (165 of 1,564 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.54 · 18.4% (287 of 1,564 decks)
All instants (38)
- Mana Leak relevance 1.39 · 47.7% (746 of 1,564 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 1.14 · 47.7% (746 of 1,564 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 1.11 · 34.4% (538 of 1,564 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.97 · 27.5% (430 of 1,564 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.95 · 25.4% (397 of 1,564 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.84 · 32.2% (503 of 1,564 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.80 · 16.0% (250 of 1,564 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.79 · 18.5% (290 of 1,564 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 0.73 · 13.9% (217 of 1,564 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.70 · 21.7% (339 of 1,564 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.67 · 13.3% (208 of 1,564 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.67 · 18.0% (281 of 1,564 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.67 · 19.2% (300 of 1,564 decks)
- Logic Knot relevance 0.61 · 10.9% (170 of 1,564 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.60 · 19.4% (303 of 1,564 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.59 · 18.5% (289 of 1,564 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.58 · 24.0% (376 of 1,564 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.58 · 25.8% (404 of 1,564 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.55 · 21.2% (331 of 1,564 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.54 · 27.9% (437 of 1,564 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 0.49 · 11.4% (178 of 1,564 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.49 · 32.4% (507 of 1,564 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.48 · 13.0% (203 of 1,564 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.48 · 13.5% (211 of 1,564 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (172 of 1,564 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 0.47 · 9.8% (154 of 1,564 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.46 · 11.8% (184 of 1,564 decks)
- Supreme Will relevance 0.46 · 10.2% (160 of 1,564 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (265 of 1,564 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.45 · 15.9% (248 of 1,564 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.44 · 12.0% (187 of 1,564 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.44 · 24.0% (375 of 1,564 decks)
- Blink of an Eye relevance 0.44 · 10.2% (159 of 1,564 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.44 · 10.5% (164 of 1,564 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (184 of 1,564 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.43 · 20.0% (313 of 1,564 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.43 · 9.2% (144 of 1,564 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.43 · 15.7% (245 of 1,564 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Mists of Lórien relevance 0.51 · 11.1% (173 of 1,564 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.50 · 16.4% (257 of 1,564 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (207 of 1,564 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.46 · 20.0% (313 of 1,564 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.43 · 16.4% (256 of 1,564 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.53 · 17.5% (274 of 1,564 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.48 · 15.9% (248 of 1,564 decks)
EDH data for Lose Focus: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,564 real decks.