Lose Focus
Played in 408 Sultai decks
230+2+32+9+3+3+1+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Spell Snare 51.7% of decks
Spell Snare 51.7% of decks
Memory Lapse 57.1% of decks
Memory Lapse 57.1% of decks
Force Spike 33.8% of decks
Force Spike 33.8% of decks
Remand 38.5% of decks
Remand 38.5% of decks
Mana Leak 50.7% of decks
Mana Leak 50.7% of decks
Stern Scolding 33.6% of decks
Stern Scolding 33.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 3.15 · 4.8% (149 of 3,087 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.80 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Spell Snare relevance 2.56 · 51.7% (211 of 408 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 2.43 · 57.1% (233 of 408 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 2.31 · 33.8% (138 of 408 decks)
- Remand relevance 2.31 · 38.5% (157 of 408 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 2.27 · 50.7% (207 of 408 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 2.22 · 33.6% (137 of 408 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 2.10 · 30.6% (125 of 408 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 2.08 · 41.2% (168 of 408 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 2.06 · 40.2% (164 of 408 decks)
- Long Goodbye relevance 1.97 · 29.4% (120 of 408 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 1.96 · 32.8% (134 of 408 decks)
- Rakshasa's Bargain relevance 1.90 · 48.8% (199 of 408 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 1.87 · 30.9% (126 of 408 decks)
- Thoughtseize relevance 1.81 · 30.6% (125 of 408 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 1.69 · 44.6% (182 of 408 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 1.69 · 27.2% (111 of 408 decks)
- Inquisition of Kozilek relevance 1.66 · 24.5% (100 of 408 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 1.61 · 29.7% (121 of 408 decks)
- Daze relevance 1.59 · 30.1% (123 of 408 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 1.59 · 28.7% (117 of 408 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 1.57 · 35.0% (143 of 408 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 1.56 · 65.7% (268 of 408 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 1.53 · 30.6% (125 of 408 decks)
- Dismember relevance 1.53 · 32.8% (134 of 408 decks)
- Drown in the Loch relevance 1.51 · 47.8% (195 of 408 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 1.47 · 27.7% (113 of 408 decks)
- Preordain relevance 1.46 · 35.8% (146 of 408 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 1.43 · 31.1% (127 of 408 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 1.42 · 32.1% (131 of 408 decks)
- Requiting Hex relevance 1.39 · 23.0% (94 of 408 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Subtlety relevance 1.53 · 30.6% (125 of 408 decks)
- Psychic Frog relevance 1.29 · 39.0% (159 of 408 decks)
All instants (32)
- Spell Snare relevance 2.56 · 51.7% (211 of 408 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 2.43 · 57.1% (233 of 408 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 2.31 · 33.8% (138 of 408 decks)
- Remand relevance 2.31 · 38.5% (157 of 408 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 2.27 · 50.7% (207 of 408 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 2.22 · 33.6% (137 of 408 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 2.10 · 30.6% (125 of 408 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 2.08 · 41.2% (168 of 408 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 2.06 · 40.2% (164 of 408 decks)
- Long Goodbye relevance 1.97 · 29.4% (120 of 408 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 1.96 · 32.8% (134 of 408 decks)
- Rakshasa's Bargain relevance 1.90 · 48.8% (199 of 408 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 1.87 · 30.9% (126 of 408 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 1.69 · 44.6% (182 of 408 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 1.69 · 27.2% (111 of 408 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 1.61 · 29.7% (121 of 408 decks)
- Daze relevance 1.59 · 30.1% (123 of 408 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 1.56 · 65.7% (268 of 408 decks)
- Dismember relevance 1.53 · 32.8% (134 of 408 decks)
- Drown in the Loch relevance 1.51 · 47.8% (195 of 408 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 1.47 · 27.7% (113 of 408 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 1.42 · 32.1% (131 of 408 decks)
- Requiting Hex relevance 1.39 · 23.0% (94 of 408 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 1.39 · 27.2% (111 of 408 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 1.37 · 23.3% (95 of 408 decks)
- Sheoldred's Edict relevance 1.35 · 26.7% (109 of 408 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 1.32 · 28.4% (116 of 408 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 1.21 · 42.2% (172 of 408 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 1.18 · 38.0% (155 of 408 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 1.12 · 33.8% (138 of 408 decks)
- Consider relevance 1.08 · 25.5% (104 of 408 decks)
- Dispel relevance 1.06 · 25.2% (103 of 408 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Thoughtseize relevance 1.81 · 30.6% (125 of 408 decks)
- Inquisition of Kozilek relevance 1.66 · 24.5% (100 of 408 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 1.57 · 35.0% (143 of 408 decks)
- Preordain relevance 1.46 · 35.8% (146 of 408 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 1.43 · 31.1% (127 of 408 decks)
- Ponder relevance 1.32 · 35.8% (146 of 408 decks)
- Duress relevance 1.22 · 20.8% (85 of 408 decks)
- Yahenni's Expertise relevance 1.09 · 16.2% (66 of 408 decks)
- Neoform relevance 1.05 · 31.4% (128 of 408 decks)
All planeswalkers (3)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 1.59 · 28.7% (117 of 408 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 1.16 · 31.4% (128 of 408 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 1.06 · 28.2% (115 of 408 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 1.44 · 39.7% (162 of 408 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.34 · 21.1% (86 of 408 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 1.07 · 29.7% (121 of 408 decks)
All lands (1)
- River of Tears relevance 1.38 · 28.7% (117 of 408 decks)
EDH data for Lose Focus: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 408 real decks.





































