Elvish Ranger
Played in 278 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
26.5% Green
- Selesnya 488 · 46.4%
- Green 278 · 26.5%
- Five-Color 108 · 10.3%
- Golgari 74 · 7.0%
- Gruul 23 · 2.2%
- Other (12) 80 · 7.6%
All commanders (5)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 4.43 · 12.3% (188 of 1,526 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 1.88 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.48 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 1.09 · 1.8% (8 of 435 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.65 · 1.5% (3 of 196 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 3.21 · 64.4% (179 of 278 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 2.99 · 56.5% (157 of 278 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.99 · 63.3% (176 of 278 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 2.81 · 55.8% (155 of 278 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.75 · 52.2% (145 of 278 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 2.71 · 50.4% (140 of 278 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 2.65 · 50.0% (139 of 278 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.47 · 44.2% (123 of 278 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.45 · 55.8% (155 of 278 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.37 · 46.0% (128 of 278 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.32 · 63.7% (177 of 278 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.25 · 59.7% (166 of 278 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 2.23 · 33.8% (94 of 278 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.13 · 38.5% (107 of 278 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.09 · 41.7% (116 of 278 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.09 · 39.2% (109 of 278 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.07 · 40.6% (113 of 278 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 2.00 · 31.3% (87 of 278 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.95 · 53.2% (148 of 278 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 1.91 · 29.9% (83 of 278 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 1.90 · 66.5% (185 of 278 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 1.88 · 31.3% (87 of 278 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 1.86 · 29.9% (83 of 278 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.85 · 29.1% (81 of 278 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.70 · 29.9% (83 of 278 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 1.69 · 25.5% (71 of 278 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 1.69 · 27.3% (76 of 278 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 1.69 · 25.2% (70 of 278 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.64 · 25.5% (71 of 278 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 1.63 · 24.5% (68 of 278 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 3.21 · 64.4% (179 of 278 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 2.99 · 56.5% (157 of 278 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.99 · 63.3% (176 of 278 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 2.81 · 55.8% (155 of 278 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.75 · 52.2% (145 of 278 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 2.71 · 50.4% (140 of 278 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 2.65 · 50.0% (139 of 278 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.47 · 44.2% (123 of 278 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.37 · 46.0% (128 of 278 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.32 · 63.7% (177 of 278 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.25 · 59.7% (166 of 278 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 2.23 · 33.8% (94 of 278 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.13 · 38.5% (107 of 278 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.09 · 41.7% (116 of 278 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.09 · 39.2% (109 of 278 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.07 · 40.6% (113 of 278 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 2.00 · 31.3% (87 of 278 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.95 · 53.2% (148 of 278 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 1.91 · 29.9% (83 of 278 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 1.90 · 66.5% (185 of 278 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 1.88 · 31.3% (87 of 278 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 1.86 · 29.9% (83 of 278 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.85 · 29.1% (81 of 278 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.70 · 29.9% (83 of 278 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 1.69 · 25.5% (71 of 278 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 1.69 · 27.3% (76 of 278 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 1.69 · 25.2% (70 of 278 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.64 · 25.5% (71 of 278 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 1.63 · 24.5% (68 of 278 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 1.49 · 25.2% (70 of 278 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 1.44 · 42.8% (119 of 278 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 1.32 · 36.0% (100 of 278 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 1.31 · 21.2% (59 of 278 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.24 · 19.8% (55 of 278 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.21 · 34.5% (96 of 278 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.12 · 18.3% (51 of 278 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 1.07 · 30.6% (85 of 278 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 0.68 · 10.1% (28 of 278 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.68 · 18.3% (51 of 278 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Hall of Triumph relevance 0.84 · 16.2% (45 of 278 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.76 · 21.6% (60 of 278 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.45 · 55.8% (155 of 278 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 1.24 · 27.7% (77 of 278 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 1.03 · 42.4% (118 of 278 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.85 · 27.3% (76 of 278 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.75 · 32.7% (91 of 278 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.93 · 20.5% (57 of 278 decks)
- Mouth // Feed relevance 0.86 · 15.8% (44 of 278 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.72 · 31.3% (87 of 278 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.76 · 29.9% (83 of 278 decks)
EDH data for Elvish Ranger: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 278 real decks.