Elvish Ranger
Played in 498 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
46.6% Selesnya
- Selesnya 498 · 46.6%
- Green 283 · 26.5%
- Five-Color 110 · 10.3%
- Golgari 74 · 6.9%
- Gruul 23 · 2.2%
- Other (12) 81 · 7.6%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (3)
- Jasmine Boreal of the Seven relevance 4.32 · 11.5% (479 of 4,172 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.89 · 8.3% (3 of 36 decks)
- Lady Caleria relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 3.02 · 74.7% (372 of 498 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 2.95 · 76.7% (382 of 498 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.88 · 70.5% (351 of 498 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.88 · 74.7% (372 of 498 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.82 · 63.7% (317 of 498 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.80 · 71.7% (357 of 498 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.78 · 70.7% (352 of 498 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.74 · 67.9% (338 of 498 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 2.73 · 62.7% (312 of 498 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.73 · 70.9% (353 of 498 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.60 · 62.0% (309 of 498 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 2.59 · 57.0% (284 of 498 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 2.56 · 62.2% (310 of 498 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 2.53 · 60.0% (299 of 498 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 2.52 · 45.6% (227 of 498 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.48 · 64.3% (320 of 498 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.38 · 52.4% (261 of 498 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 2.38 · 50.4% (251 of 498 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.36 · 54.6% (272 of 498 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 2.30 · 51.2% (255 of 498 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.29 · 53.6% (267 of 498 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 2.24 · 56.6% (282 of 498 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 2.22 · 55.8% (278 of 498 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 2.21 · 47.8% (238 of 498 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 2.00 · 41.0% (204 of 498 decks)
- Savai Sabertooth relevance 1.96 · 41.0% (204 of 498 decks)
- Prowling Caracal relevance 1.96 · 37.3% (186 of 498 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 1.83 · 37.8% (188 of 498 decks)
- Shepherd of the Flock // Usher to Safety relevance 1.82 · 40.0% (199 of 498 decks)
- Knight of New Benalia relevance 1.74 · 31.3% (156 of 498 decks)
All creatures (44)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 3.02 · 74.7% (372 of 498 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 2.95 · 76.7% (382 of 498 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.88 · 70.5% (351 of 498 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.88 · 74.7% (372 of 498 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.82 · 63.7% (317 of 498 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.78 · 70.7% (352 of 498 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.74 · 67.9% (338 of 498 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 2.73 · 62.7% (312 of 498 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.73 · 70.9% (353 of 498 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.60 · 62.0% (309 of 498 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 2.59 · 57.0% (284 of 498 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 2.56 · 62.2% (310 of 498 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 2.53 · 60.0% (299 of 498 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 2.52 · 45.6% (227 of 498 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.48 · 64.3% (320 of 498 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.38 · 52.4% (261 of 498 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 2.38 · 50.4% (251 of 498 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.36 · 54.6% (272 of 498 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 2.30 · 51.2% (255 of 498 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.29 · 53.6% (267 of 498 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 2.24 · 56.6% (282 of 498 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 2.22 · 55.8% (278 of 498 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 2.21 · 47.8% (238 of 498 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 2.00 · 41.0% (204 of 498 decks)
- Savai Sabertooth relevance 1.96 · 41.0% (204 of 498 decks)
- Prowling Caracal relevance 1.96 · 37.3% (186 of 498 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 1.83 · 37.8% (188 of 498 decks)
- Shepherd of the Flock // Usher to Safety relevance 1.82 · 40.0% (199 of 498 decks)
- Knight of New Benalia relevance 1.74 · 31.3% (156 of 498 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 1.74 · 37.6% (187 of 498 decks)
- Cliffhaven Sell-Sword relevance 1.72 · 32.5% (162 of 498 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 1.62 · 29.7% (148 of 498 decks)
- Dromoka Warrior relevance 1.62 · 27.9% (139 of 498 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 1.59 · 34.9% (174 of 498 decks)
- Expedition Envoy relevance 1.52 · 28.7% (143 of 498 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.52 · 33.1% (165 of 498 decks)
- Glass Golem relevance 1.50 · 26.7% (133 of 498 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.39 · 26.5% (132 of 498 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.30 · 24.9% (124 of 498 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 1.28 · 26.1% (130 of 498 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.26 · 23.5% (117 of 498 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 1.22 · 20.7% (103 of 498 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 1.22 · 22.3% (111 of 498 decks)
- Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 1.18 · 21.5% (107 of 498 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.80 · 71.7% (357 of 498 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 1.50 · 50.0% (249 of 498 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 1.34 · 31.1% (155 of 498 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 1.27 · 44.4% (221 of 498 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 1.19 · 27.9% (139 of 498 decks)
All instants (1)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 1.24 · 39.4% (196 of 498 decks)
EDH data for Elvish Ranger: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 498 real decks.