Reclamation Sage
Played in 24,644 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 2.60 · 48.8% (3,473 of 7,114 decks)
- Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 2.56 · 37.2% (10,046 of 27,020 decks)
- Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 2.15 · 32.7% (4,017 of 12,297 decks)
- Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 1.49 · 24.1% (906 of 3,754 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 1.37 · 17.3% (2,259 of 13,086 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 1.15 · 17.6% (599 of 3,409 decks)
- Otrimi, the Ever-Playful relevance 1.03 · 17.3% (327 of 1,894 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.93 · 35.8% (29 of 81 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.81 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 0.50 · 7.1% (213 of 2,998 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (132 of 2,779 decks)
- Vorosh, the Hunter relevance 0.30 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- The Mimeoplasm relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (150 of 3,666 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.29 · 15.2% (5 of 33 decks)
- Kotis, Sibsig Champion relevance 0.28 · 5.7% (36 of 633 decks)
- Henry Wu, InGen Geneticist relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (33 of 631 decks)
- Kotis, the Fangkeeper relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (277 of 9,280 decks)
- Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (44 of 1,025 decks)
- Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (615 of 27,172 decks)
- Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (60 of 1,639 decks)
- Ukkima, Stalking Shadow // Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (70 of 2,194 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.19 · 16.7% (2 of 12 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (62 of 2,126 decks)
- The Master, Transcendent relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (61 of 2,229 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (80 of 3,426 decks)
- Nocturno of Myra's Marvels // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Zaxara, the Exemplary relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (204 of 11,484 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (3 of 36 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (225 of 13,696 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.97 · 42.5% (10,471 of 24,644 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.92 · 40.7% (10,031 of 24,644 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.91 · 37.2% (9,156 of 24,644 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.89 · 37.9% (9,350 of 24,644 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.85 · 48.1% (11,851 of 24,644 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.84 · 57.9% (14,271 of 24,644 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.81 · 34.7% (8,551 of 24,644 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.81 · 29.2% (7,201 of 24,644 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.80 · 29.1% (7,166 of 24,644 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.78 · 29.4% (7,251 of 24,644 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.75 · 26.7% (6,580 of 24,644 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.72 · 27.1% (6,671 of 24,644 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.65 · 21.5% (5,289 of 24,644 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.65 · 27.3% (6,730 of 24,644 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.63 · 20.9% (5,150 of 24,644 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.62 · 26.9% (6,638 of 24,644 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.62 · 22.7% (5,582 of 24,644 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.61 · 22.4% (5,531 of 24,644 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.60 · 22.9% (5,632 of 24,644 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.60 · 21.4% (5,269 of 24,644 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.59 · 19.3% (4,747 of 24,644 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.59 · 19.3% (4,746 of 24,644 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.59 · 25.5% (6,285 of 24,644 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.56 · 19.1% (4,700 of 24,644 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.56 · 20.7% (5,095 of 24,644 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.56 · 18.5% (4,565 of 24,644 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.55 · 19.8% (4,870 of 24,644 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.55 · 19.2% (4,732 of 24,644 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.54 · 16.1% (3,961 of 24,644 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.54 · 18.3% (4,516 of 24,644 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.97 · 42.5% (10,471 of 24,644 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.92 · 40.7% (10,031 of 24,644 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.91 · 37.2% (9,156 of 24,644 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.89 · 37.9% (9,350 of 24,644 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.85 · 48.1% (11,851 of 24,644 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.84 · 57.9% (14,271 of 24,644 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.81 · 34.7% (8,551 of 24,644 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.81 · 29.2% (7,201 of 24,644 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.80 · 29.1% (7,166 of 24,644 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.78 · 29.4% (7,251 of 24,644 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.75 · 26.7% (6,580 of 24,644 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.72 · 27.1% (6,671 of 24,644 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.65 · 27.3% (6,730 of 24,644 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.63 · 20.9% (5,150 of 24,644 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.62 · 26.9% (6,638 of 24,644 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.62 · 22.7% (5,582 of 24,644 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.61 · 22.4% (5,531 of 24,644 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.60 · 22.9% (5,632 of 24,644 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.60 · 21.4% (5,269 of 24,644 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.59 · 19.3% (4,746 of 24,644 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.59 · 25.5% (6,285 of 24,644 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.56 · 19.1% (4,700 of 24,644 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.56 · 18.5% (4,565 of 24,644 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.55 · 19.2% (4,732 of 24,644 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.54 · 16.1% (3,961 of 24,644 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.54 · 18.3% (4,516 of 24,644 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.54 · 15.2% (3,747 of 24,644 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.53 · 18.4% (4,530 of 24,644 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.53 · 30.1% (7,418 of 24,644 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 0.53 · 17.8% (4,375 of 24,644 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.52 · 17.9% (4,402 of 24,644 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.51 · 23.2% (5,727 of 24,644 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.51 · 16.7% (4,117 of 24,644 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.50 · 16.1% (3,965 of 24,644 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.49 · 15.1% (3,732 of 24,644 decks)
- Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 0.49 · 15.9% (3,923 of 24,644 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.49 · 15.2% (3,756 of 24,644 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.48 · 13.8% (3,413 of 24,644 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.48 · 17.3% (4,254 of 24,644 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.48 · 19.2% (4,730 of 24,644 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.65 · 21.5% (5,289 of 24,644 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.47 · 30.3% (7,465 of 24,644 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.56 · 20.7% (5,095 of 24,644 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.52 · 19.4% (4,789 of 24,644 decks)
All instants (4)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.59 · 19.3% (4,747 of 24,644 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.55 · 19.8% (4,870 of 24,644 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.52 · 35.0% (8,628 of 24,644 decks)
- Spell Stutter relevance 0.51 · 15.8% (3,894 of 24,644 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.55 · 38.3% (9,429 of 24,644 decks)
All lands (1)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.51 · 16.9% (4,168 of 24,644 decks)
EDH data for Reclamation Sage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 24,644 real decks.