Walker of the Grove
Played in 86 Gruul decks
330+39+1+3+1+3+3+
Color Identity Spread
6.5% Gruul
Commanders
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 12.5% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 12.5% of decks
Strider, Ranger of the North 1.9% of decks
Strider, Ranger of the North 1.9% of decks
Kraven, Proud Predator 1.1% of decks
Kraven, Proud Predator 1.1% of decks
Most Relevant
Ulamog's Crusher 27.9% of decks
Ulamog's Crusher 27.9% of decks
Spitebellows 20.9% of decks
Spitebellows 20.9% of decks
Cloudthresher 18.6% of decks
Cloudthresher 18.6% of decks
Annoyed Altisaur 32.6% of decks
Annoyed Altisaur 32.6% of decks
Maelstrom Colossus 24.4% of decks
Maelstrom Colossus 24.4% of decks
Greater Sandwurm 16.3% of decks
Greater Sandwurm 16.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Strider, Ranger of the North relevance 0.50 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.43 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 1.50 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 1.28 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Cloudthresher relevance 1.28 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.23 · 32.6% (28 of 86 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 1.19 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 1.12 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.10 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 1.07 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 0.98 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.97 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 0.92 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 0.90 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.88 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.87 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Molten Monstrosity relevance 0.86 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.82 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 0.78 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 0.76 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Fang Dragon // Forktail Sweep relevance 0.73 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Smokebraider relevance 0.68 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Ingot Chewer relevance 0.66 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 0.64 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.62 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 0.62 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.62 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- Skred relevance 0.62 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Kulrath Zealot relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.58 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Creeping Trailblazer relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.57 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 1.50 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 1.28 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Cloudthresher relevance 1.28 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.23 · 32.6% (28 of 86 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 1.19 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 1.12 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.10 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 1.07 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 0.98 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.97 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 0.92 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 0.90 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.88 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Molten Monstrosity relevance 0.86 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.82 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 0.78 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 0.76 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Fang Dragon // Forktail Sweep relevance 0.73 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Smokebraider relevance 0.68 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Ingot Chewer relevance 0.66 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 0.64 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.62 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 0.62 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.62 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- Kulrath Zealot relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.58 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Creeping Trailblazer relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.57 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.54 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 0.54 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.52 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.52 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Rime Tender relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Undergrowth Champion relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Embodiment of Fury relevance 0.50 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.49 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.49 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.47 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.56 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.87 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.52 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- Rite of the Raging Storm relevance 0.47 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
All instants (1)
- Skred relevance 0.62 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.64 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.61 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Fertile Thicket relevance 0.53 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
All lands (3)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.70 · 45.3% (39 of 86 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.55 · 30.2% (26 of 86 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.48 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
EDH data for Walker of the Grove: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 86 real decks.


























