Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- The Chain Veil relevance 0.79 · 63.9% (399 of 624 decks)
- Intellectual Offering relevance 0.71 · 22.9% (143 of 624 decks)
- Distorting Wake relevance 0.73 · 12.8% (80 of 624 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.63 · 22.6% (141 of 624 decks)
- Crown of Doom relevance 0.78 · 8.0% (50 of 624 decks)
- Frost Titan relevance 0.67 · 14.4% (90 of 624 decks)
- Fool's Demise relevance 0.72 · 11.5% (72 of 624 decks)
- Sphinx of Magosi relevance 0.66 · 15.1% (94 of 624 decks)
- Ur-Golem's Eye relevance 0.66 · 14.7% (92 of 624 decks)
- Hoverguard Sweepers relevance 0.75 · 9.0% (56 of 624 decks)
- Unstable Obelisk relevance 0.67 · 13.1% (82 of 624 decks)
- Azure Mage relevance 0.72 · 9.5% (59 of 624 decks)
- Shaper Parasite relevance 0.76 · 6.9% (43 of 624 decks)
- Breaching Leviathan relevance 0.61 · 16.7% (104 of 624 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.61 · 15.5% (97 of 624 decks)
- Infinite Reflection relevance 0.68 · 10.9% (68 of 624 decks)
- Turn to Frog relevance 0.65 · 12.3% (77 of 624 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.35 · 70.7% (441 of 624 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 0.59 · 17.8% (111 of 624 decks)
- Dulcet Sirens relevance 0.68 · 10.3% (64 of 624 decks)
- Call to Mind relevance 0.59 · 16.2% (101 of 624 decks)
- Riptide Survivor relevance 0.71 · 7.4% (46 of 624 decks)
- Domineering Will relevance 0.59 · 16.0% (100 of 624 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.66 · 10.6% (66 of 624 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.54 · 23.1% (144 of 624 decks)
- Brine Elemental relevance 0.65 · 10.7% (67 of 624 decks)
- Sphinx of Jwar Isle relevance 0.66 · 9.8% (61 of 624 decks)
- Phyrexian Ingester relevance 0.60 · 13.9% (87 of 624 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 0.57 · 16.2% (101 of 624 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.57 · 15.7% (98 of 624 decks)
- Stitcher Geralf relevance 0.64 · 10.4% (65 of 624 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (77 of 624 decks)
- Reef Worm relevance 0.57 · 15.2% (95 of 624 decks)
- Teferi's Talent relevance 0.62 · 10.7% (67 of 624 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.56 · 16.3% (102 of 624 decks)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 0.55 · 17.8% (111 of 624 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.40 · 49.4% (308 of 624 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.57 · 13.8% (86 of 624 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.55 · 14.9% (93 of 624 decks)
- Willbender relevance 0.60 · 11.2% (70 of 624 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.50 · 22.8% (142 of 624 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.54 · 15.7% (98 of 624 decks)
- Teferi, Timeless Voyager relevance 0.65 · 6.6% (41 of 624 decks)
- Assault Suit relevance 0.63 · 8.2% (51 of 624 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.36 · 52.9% (330 of 624 decks)
- Ixidron relevance 0.55 · 13.1% (82 of 624 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.50 · 21.2% (132 of 624 decks)
- Sphinx of Uthuun relevance 0.56 · 12.3% (77 of 624 decks)
- Stasis relevance 0.58 · 10.4% (65 of 624 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.50 · 19.4% (121 of 624 decks)
Card Stacks
21
Card Stacks
21Showing 1-2 of 21
Cards like Sol Ring
3.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
91% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 89%
- Basalt Monolith 53%
- Mana Vault 36%
- Grim Monolith 29%
Cards like Thran Dynamo
9.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Ring of the Lucii, Ichor Elixir
Cards like Voltaic Key
6.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Mystic Remora
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 45%
- Rhystic Study 45%
Cards like Tezzeret the Seeker
7.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Negation
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 36%
- Force of Will 34%
Cards like Gilded Lotus
8.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards like Aether Gale
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aether Gale 17%
- Distorting Wake 13%
- River's Rebuke 2%
Cards like Chrome Mox
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 25%
- Mox Diamond 16%
Cards like Fabricate
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 48%
- Scour for Scrap 18%
Cards like Copy Artifact
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Trinket Mage
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
- Trinket Mage 30%
- Transit Mage 12%
- Trophy Mage 8%
- Tribute Mage 5%
- Treasure Mage 2%
Cards like Flux Channeler
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flux Channeler 18%
- Dreamtide Whale 13%
Cards like Transmute Artifact
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Transmute Artifact 22%
- Reshape 20%
Cards like Flusterstorm
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards like Mystical Tutor
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Teferi, Master of Time
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Jace, the Mind Sculptor
5.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Aetherize
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards like Frantic Search
7.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 61%
- Commander's Sphere 17%
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Frost Titan relevance 0.67 · 14.4% (90 of 624 decks)
- Sphinx of Magosi relevance 0.66 · 15.1% (94 of 624 decks)
- Hoverguard Sweepers relevance 0.75 · 9.0% (56 of 624 decks)
- Azure Mage relevance 0.72 · 9.5% (59 of 624 decks)
- Shaper Parasite relevance 0.76 · 6.9% (43 of 624 decks)
- Breaching Leviathan relevance 0.61 · 16.7% (104 of 624 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.61 · 15.5% (97 of 624 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 0.59 · 17.8% (111 of 624 decks)
- Dulcet Sirens relevance 0.68 · 10.3% (64 of 624 decks)
- Riptide Survivor relevance 0.71 · 7.4% (46 of 624 decks)
- Brine Elemental relevance 0.65 · 10.7% (67 of 624 decks)
- Sphinx of Jwar Isle relevance 0.66 · 9.8% (61 of 624 decks)
- Phyrexian Ingester relevance 0.60 · 13.9% (87 of 624 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.57 · 15.7% (98 of 624 decks)
- Stitcher Geralf relevance 0.64 · 10.4% (65 of 624 decks)
- Reef Worm relevance 0.57 · 15.2% (95 of 624 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.57 · 13.8% (86 of 624 decks)
- Willbender relevance 0.60 · 11.2% (70 of 624 decks)
- Ixidron relevance 0.55 · 13.1% (82 of 624 decks)
- Sphinx of Uthuun relevance 0.56 · 12.3% (77 of 624 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 0.46 · 24.8% (155 of 624 decks)
- Fathom Seer relevance 0.61 · 7.1% (44 of 624 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.50 · 15.7% (98 of 624 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 0.49 · 14.6% (91 of 624 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 0.52 · 10.4% (65 of 624 decks)
- Conduit of Ruin relevance 0.57 · 4.8% (30 of 624 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.45 · 11.9% (74 of 624 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.38 · 25.2% (157 of 624 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.35 · 30.0% (187 of 624 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.38 · 18.1% (113 of 624 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.42 · 11.4% (71 of 624 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.38 · 13.9% (87 of 624 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.34 · 23.9% (149 of 624 decks)
- Kozilek, the Great Distortion relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (33 of 624 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.39 · 12.5% (78 of 624 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.33 · 27.2% (170 of 624 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.39 · 10.3% (64 of 624 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.34 · 15.9% (99 of 624 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.42 · 6.3% (39 of 624 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.33 · 16.8% (105 of 624 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.43 · 5.1% (32 of 624 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (88 of 624 decks)
- Sparkshaper Visionary relevance 0.57 · 2.7% (17 of 624 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.44 · 4.3% (27 of 624 decks)
- Guildpact Informant relevance 0.40 · 5.1% (32 of 624 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.29 · 18.3% (114 of 624 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (28 of 624 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.37 · 6.3% (39 of 624 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.28 · 19.9% (124 of 624 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.36 · 6.9% (43 of 624 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- The Chain Veil relevance 0.79 · 63.9% (399 of 624 decks)
- Crown of Doom relevance 0.78 · 8.0% (50 of 624 decks)
- Ur-Golem's Eye relevance 0.66 · 14.7% (92 of 624 decks)
- Unstable Obelisk relevance 0.67 · 13.1% (82 of 624 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.35 · 70.7% (441 of 624 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.54 · 23.1% (144 of 624 decks)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 0.55 · 17.8% (111 of 624 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.50 · 22.8% (142 of 624 decks)
- Assault Suit relevance 0.63 · 8.2% (51 of 624 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.36 · 52.9% (330 of 624 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.50 · 19.4% (121 of 624 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.44 · 31.7% (198 of 624 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.36 · 47.8% (298 of 624 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.41 · 35.3% (220 of 624 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.47 · 20.5% (128 of 624 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.40 · 34.8% (217 of 624 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.53 · 11.2% (70 of 624 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.43 · 23.7% (148 of 624 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.40 · 29.5% (184 of 624 decks)
- Trinisphere relevance 0.50 · 11.1% (69 of 624 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.48 · 12.8% (80 of 624 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.37 · 28.4% (177 of 624 decks)
- Torpor Orb relevance 0.48 · 9.3% (58 of 624 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.34 · 36.2% (226 of 624 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.46 · 10.9% (68 of 624 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.39 · 21.2% (132 of 624 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.29 · 48.9% (305 of 624 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.35 · 20.8% (130 of 624 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.33 · 26.9% (168 of 624 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.35 · 20.2% (126 of 624 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.33 · 24.7% (154 of 624 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.36 · 16.0% (100 of 624 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.35 · 16.8% (105 of 624 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.30 · 29.3% (183 of 624 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.28 · 32.7% (204 of 624 decks)
- Luxior, Giada's Gift relevance 0.53 · 3.5% (22 of 624 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.42 · 5.1% (32 of 624 decks)
- Winter Orb relevance 0.37 · 9.9% (62 of 624 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.39 · 7.9% (49 of 624 decks)
- Static Orb relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (48 of 624 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (48 of 624 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.37 · 8.7% (54 of 624 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.36 · 7.2% (45 of 624 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.28 · 21.5% (134 of 624 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.40 · 4.3% (27 of 624 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.34 · 7.7% (48 of 624 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.30 · 12.7% (79 of 624 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.33 · 6.4% (40 of 624 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (27 of 624 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.23 · 28.4% (177 of 624 decks)
Enchantments
29
Enchantments
29 Showing 1-10 of 29
Page size
All enchantments (29)
- Fool's Demise relevance 0.72 · 11.5% (72 of 624 decks)
- Infinite Reflection relevance 0.68 · 10.9% (68 of 624 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 0.57 · 16.2% (101 of 624 decks)
- Teferi's Talent relevance 0.62 · 10.7% (67 of 624 decks)
- Stasis relevance 0.58 · 10.4% (65 of 624 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.43 · 21.6% (135 of 624 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.40 · 13.9% (87 of 624 decks)
- Oath of Jace relevance 0.48 · 5.4% (34 of 624 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.43 · 10.6% (66 of 624 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.36 · 15.1% (94 of 624 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.34 · 13.0% (81 of 624 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.39 · 5.4% (34 of 624 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.20 · 45.4% (283 of 624 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (31 of 624 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.29 · 10.7% (67 of 624 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.19 · 45.0% (281 of 624 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.22 · 15.5% (97 of 624 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.33 · 3.7% (23 of 624 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (20 of 624 decks)
- Ever-Watching Threshold relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (17 of 624 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (31 of 624 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.22 · 6.9% (43 of 624 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (28 of 624 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.16 · 20.7% (129 of 624 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (16 of 624 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (24 of 624 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (17 of 624 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (23 of 624 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (16 of 624 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Intellectual Offering relevance 0.71 · 22.9% (143 of 624 decks)
- Turn to Frog relevance 0.65 · 12.3% (77 of 624 decks)
- Domineering Will relevance 0.59 · 16.0% (100 of 624 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.55 · 14.9% (93 of 624 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.50 · 21.2% (132 of 624 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.52 · 14.3% (89 of 624 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.45 · 14.7% (92 of 624 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.33 · 43.6% (272 of 624 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.34 · 34.8% (217 of 624 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.42 · 13.1% (82 of 624 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.32 · 33.0% (206 of 624 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.38 · 15.7% (98 of 624 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.35 · 22.8% (142 of 624 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.36 · 19.9% (124 of 624 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.37 · 14.4% (90 of 624 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.32 · 25.8% (161 of 624 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.38 · 12.5% (78 of 624 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.33 · 17.8% (111 of 624 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.42 · 5.9% (37 of 624 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.33 · 17.8% (111 of 624 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.27 · 35.6% (222 of 624 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.20 · 64.9% (405 of 624 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (53 of 624 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.38 · 6.6% (41 of 624 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.26 · 34.0% (212 of 624 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.33 · 12.3% (77 of 624 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.35 · 10.6% (66 of 624 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.37 · 7.4% (46 of 624 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.31 · 14.3% (89 of 624 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.31 · 12.8% (80 of 624 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.25 · 32.4% (202 of 624 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.21 · 45.5% (284 of 624 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.24 · 33.8% (211 of 624 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.31 · 11.1% (69 of 624 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (52 of 624 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.31 · 9.5% (59 of 624 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (32 of 624 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (33 of 624 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.38 · 3.8% (24 of 624 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (28 of 624 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.24 · 17.8% (111 of 624 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.19 · 41.5% (259 of 624 decks)
- Kozilek's Command relevance 0.46 · 2.6% (16 of 624 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.22 · 28.2% (176 of 624 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.25 · 13.6% (85 of 624 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.26 · 11.9% (74 of 624 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (26 of 624 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (25 of 624 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (52 of 624 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (28 of 624 decks)
Sorceries
48
Sorceries
48 Showing 1-10 of 48
Page size
All sorceries (48)
- Distorting Wake relevance 0.73 · 12.8% (80 of 624 decks)
- Call to Mind relevance 0.59 · 16.2% (101 of 624 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (77 of 624 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.56 · 16.3% (102 of 624 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.49 · 16.5% (103 of 624 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.50 · 13.1% (82 of 624 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.44 · 22.4% (140 of 624 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.43 · 14.7% (92 of 624 decks)
- Lunar Insight relevance 0.48 · 8.0% (50 of 624 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.48 · 7.2% (45 of 624 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.45 · 9.5% (59 of 624 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.35 · 23.2% (145 of 624 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.44 · 8.3% (52 of 624 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.35 · 19.6% (122 of 624 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.25 · 47.6% (297 of 624 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.41 · 8.2% (51 of 624 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.38 · 10.7% (67 of 624 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.43 · 5.8% (36 of 624 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.36 · 13.5% (84 of 624 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.36 · 11.5% (72 of 624 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.40 · 5.9% (37 of 624 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.36 · 9.3% (58 of 624 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.31 · 15.7% (98 of 624 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.31 · 13.6% (85 of 624 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.28 · 14.9% (93 of 624 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.34 · 4.8% (30 of 624 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (33 of 624 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.33 · 5.4% (34 of 624 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.21 · 27.9% (174 of 624 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (31 of 624 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.28 · 6.6% (41 of 624 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.19 · 33.8% (211 of 624 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.21 · 19.2% (120 of 624 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.25 · 9.8% (61 of 624 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (19 of 624 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (29 of 624 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (23 of 624 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.24 · 6.4% (40 of 624 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (18 of 624 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (27 of 624 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (19 of 624 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (15 of 624 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (18 of 624 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (20 of 624 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (27 of 624 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (18 of 624 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (25 of 624 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (17 of 624 decks)
Planeswalkers
36
Planeswalkers
36 Showing 1-10 of 36
Page size
All planeswalkers (36)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.63 · 22.6% (141 of 624 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.66 · 10.6% (66 of 624 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.40 · 49.4% (308 of 624 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.54 · 15.7% (98 of 624 decks)
- Teferi, Timeless Voyager relevance 0.65 · 6.6% (41 of 624 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.45 · 27.1% (169 of 624 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (125 of 624 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (89 of 624 decks)
- Will Kenrith relevance 0.58 · 5.9% (37 of 624 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.52 · 10.6% (66 of 624 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.51 · 11.4% (71 of 624 decks)
- Karn Liberated relevance 0.58 · 5.9% (37 of 624 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.45 · 14.1% (88 of 624 decks)
- Mu Yanling, Sky Dancer relevance 0.51 · 7.7% (48 of 624 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.40 · 19.7% (123 of 624 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.47 · 8.0% (50 of 624 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.35 · 27.7% (173 of 624 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.44 · 10.1% (63 of 624 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.45 · 9.5% (59 of 624 decks)
- Jace, Memory Adept relevance 0.43 · 11.1% (69 of 624 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.36 · 23.2% (145 of 624 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.45 · 7.4% (46 of 624 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.41 · 11.2% (70 of 624 decks)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.44 · 7.4% (46 of 624 decks)
- Jace, Ingenious Mind-Mage relevance 0.46 · 5.6% (35 of 624 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.40 · 9.5% (59 of 624 decks)
- Jace, the Living Guildpact relevance 0.46 · 4.6% (29 of 624 decks)
- Mu Yanling relevance 0.50 · 4.0% (25 of 624 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.42 · 5.9% (37 of 624 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.42 · 5.0% (31 of 624 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.39 · 5.6% (35 of 624 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.27 · 24.8% (155 of 624 decks)
- Jace, Cunning Castaway relevance 0.41 · 4.0% (25 of 624 decks)
- Jace, the Perfected Mind relevance 0.34 · 5.0% (31 of 624 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.39 · 3.8% (24 of 624 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (21 of 624 decks)
Utility Lands
44
Utility Lands
44 Showing 1-10 of 44
Page size
All utility lands (44)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.67 · 15.7% (98 of 624 decks)
- Zoetic Cavern relevance 0.63 · 9.6% (60 of 624 decks)
- Interplanar Beacon relevance 0.60 · 5.8% (36 of 624 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.48 · 14.7% (92 of 624 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.54 · 5.6% (35 of 624 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.53 · 5.0% (31 of 624 decks)
- Eye of Ugin relevance 0.57 · 4.2% (26 of 624 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.39 · 15.2% (95 of 624 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.37 · 14.7% (92 of 624 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.30 · 34.1% (213 of 624 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.37 · 11.2% (70 of 624 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.26 · 33.2% (207 of 624 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.49 · 3.5% (22 of 624 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.30 · 17.3% (108 of 624 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.28 · 24.5% (153 of 624 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.28 · 22.3% (139 of 624 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.25 · 21.0% (131 of 624 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.23 · 28.8% (180 of 624 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.23 · 27.2% (170 of 624 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.20 · 36.2% (226 of 624 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.31 · 5.6% (35 of 624 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (43 of 624 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.24 · 16.5% (103 of 624 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.25 · 13.0% (81 of 624 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.20 · 26.8% (167 of 624 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (32 of 624 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.22 · 11.4% (71 of 624 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.37 · 2.4% (15 of 624 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.22 · 9.1% (57 of 624 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (32 of 624 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (33 of 624 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (19 of 624 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (22 of 624 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.22 · 4.6% (29 of 624 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (20 of 624 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (36 of 624 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.11 · 40.5% (253 of 624 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (22 of 624 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 41.5% (259 of 624 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (17 of 624 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (15 of 624 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (18 of 624 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (15 of 624 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (16 of 624 decks)
Lands
28
Lands
28 Showing 1-10 of 28
Page size
All lands (28)
- Lotus Vale relevance 0.63 · 7.7% (48 of 624 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.48 · 21.6% (135 of 624 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.53 · 11.9% (74 of 624 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.44 · 11.2% (70 of 624 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.43 · 12.2% (76 of 624 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.53 · 4.3% (27 of 624 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.35 · 17.9% (112 of 624 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.34 · 19.9% (124 of 624 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.33 · 20.8% (130 of 624 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.33 · 20.8% (130 of 624 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.31 · 27.4% (171 of 624 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.33 · 17.3% (108 of 624 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.36 · 12.0% (75 of 624 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.32 · 14.4% (90 of 624 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.36 · 7.2% (45 of 624 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.45 · 3.8% (24 of 624 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.31 · 13.0% (81 of 624 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (24 of 624 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.25 · 19.7% (123 of 624 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (38 of 624 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (38 of 624 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (38 of 624 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.21 · 20.7% (129 of 624 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (24 of 624 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.21 · 5.6% (35 of 624 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (15 of 624 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (16 of 624 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 83.8% (523 of 624 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Teferi, Temporal Archmage, from 624 real Commander decks.