Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
12× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Selesnya decks
48% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 49%
- Gyre Sage 45%
- Incubation Druid 43%
Cards like Hardened Scales
6.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like The Earth Crystal
15× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Three Visits
2.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Three Visits 45%
- Nature's Lore 45%
- Skyshroud Claim 3%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Cultivate
1.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other Selesnya decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.95 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Cultivate 51%
- Rampant Growth 38%
- Kodama's Reach 19%
- Reach the Horizon 8%
- Shared Roots 5%
- Migration Path 1%
Other options: Beneath the Sands, Grow from the Ashes, Explosive Vegetation, Map the Frontier, Search for Tomorrow, Roamer's Routine, New Generation's Technique, Terramorph, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Path to the Festival
Cards like Abzan Battle Priest
7.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Evolution Witness
7.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Ouroboroid
7.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Loxodon Battle Priest
Cards like Collective Effort
11× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Duskshell Crawler
3.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Crowned Ceratok, Baloth Pup, Trollbred Guardian
Cards like Beast Within
1.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other Selesnya decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 19% of other Selesnya decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Beast Within 36%
- Generous Gift 32%
Cards like Heroic Intervention
1.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Mikaeus, the Lunarch
2.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Guiding Hydra, Contortionist Troupe, Capricopian, Feral Hydra, Hungering Hydra
Cards like Inspiring Call
3.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Generous Pup
13× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 36%
- Lightning Greaves 20%
Cards like Terrasymbiosis
4.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Bristly Bill, Spine Sower
1.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Fangs of Kalonia
4.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
All top picks (50)
- Chocobo Knights relevance 0.60 · 53.8% (121 of 225 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.58 · 54.7% (123 of 225 decks)
- Auron, Venerated Guardian relevance 0.64 · 36.4% (82 of 225 decks)
- Blitzball relevance 0.63 · 26.2% (59 of 225 decks)
- Tromell, Seymour's Butler relevance 0.56 · 36.0% (81 of 225 decks)
- Gatta and Luzzu relevance 0.56 · 32.9% (74 of 225 decks)
- Liquimetal Coating relevance 0.68 · 13.3% (30 of 225 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.46 · 44.9% (101 of 225 decks)
- Shelinda, Yevon Acolyte relevance 0.47 · 41.3% (93 of 225 decks)
- Blitzball Shot relevance 0.58 · 16.9% (38 of 225 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.41 · 48.4% (109 of 225 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.36 · 58.2% (131 of 225 decks)
- Grateful Apparition relevance 0.49 · 24.4% (55 of 225 decks)
- Yuna's Whistle relevance 0.52 · 17.8% (40 of 225 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.40 · 42.7% (96 of 225 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.37 · 44.9% (101 of 225 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.52 · 13.3% (30 of 225 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.48 · 18.2% (41 of 225 decks)
- Rampant Rejuvenator relevance 0.48 · 18.7% (42 of 225 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.37 · 43.1% (97 of 225 decks)
- Generous Pup relevance 0.46 · 18.7% (42 of 225 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.38 · 38.2% (86 of 225 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.47 · 16.0% (36 of 225 decks)
- Lord Jyscal Guado relevance 0.53 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.33 · 48.0% (108 of 225 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.25 · 71.1% (160 of 225 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.41 · 20.9% (47 of 225 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.46 · 12.9% (29 of 225 decks)
- Bushmaster, Coiled Henchman relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 0.43 · 16.0% (36 of 225 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Martial Mentor relevance 0.50 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.31 · 46.2% (104 of 225 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.31 · 48.9% (110 of 225 decks)
- Collective Effort relevance 0.41 · 19.1% (43 of 225 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 0.37 · 28.9% (65 of 225 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.30 · 49.8% (112 of 225 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.34 · 38.2% (86 of 225 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.26 · 64.0% (144 of 225 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.49 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.37 · 27.1% (61 of 225 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.38 · 25.3% (57 of 225 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.29 · 49.3% (111 of 225 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.33 · 36.0% (81 of 225 decks)
- Protection Magic relevance 0.43 · 13.3% (30 of 225 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.29 · 49.3% (111 of 225 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.33 · 35.6% (80 of 225 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.40 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Cloudbound Moogle relevance 0.49 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.33 · 33.8% (76 of 225 decks)
- Dusk Legion Duelist relevance 0.37 · 21.8% (49 of 225 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Chocobo Knights relevance 0.60 · 53.8% (121 of 225 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.58 · 54.7% (123 of 225 decks)
- Auron, Venerated Guardian relevance 0.64 · 36.4% (82 of 225 decks)
- Tromell, Seymour's Butler relevance 0.56 · 36.0% (81 of 225 decks)
- Gatta and Luzzu relevance 0.56 · 32.9% (74 of 225 decks)
- Shelinda, Yevon Acolyte relevance 0.47 · 41.3% (93 of 225 decks)
- Grateful Apparition relevance 0.49 · 24.4% (55 of 225 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.40 · 42.7% (96 of 225 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.37 · 44.9% (101 of 225 decks)
- Rampant Rejuvenator relevance 0.48 · 18.7% (42 of 225 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.37 · 43.1% (97 of 225 decks)
- Generous Pup relevance 0.46 · 18.7% (42 of 225 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.38 · 38.2% (86 of 225 decks)
- Lord Jyscal Guado relevance 0.53 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.46 · 12.9% (29 of 225 decks)
- Bushmaster, Coiled Henchman relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 0.43 · 16.0% (36 of 225 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Martial Mentor relevance 0.50 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.31 · 46.2% (104 of 225 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.31 · 48.9% (110 of 225 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 0.37 · 28.9% (65 of 225 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.37 · 27.1% (61 of 225 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.38 · 25.3% (57 of 225 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.29 · 49.3% (111 of 225 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.29 · 49.3% (111 of 225 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.40 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Cloudbound Moogle relevance 0.49 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.33 · 33.8% (76 of 225 decks)
- Dusk Legion Duelist relevance 0.37 · 21.8% (49 of 225 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.34 · 29.3% (66 of 225 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.34 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Dyadrine, Synthesis Amalgam relevance 0.37 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- The Unbeatable Squirrel Girl relevance 0.42 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Rosa, Resolute White Mage relevance 0.39 · 11.6% (26 of 225 decks)
- Biophagus relevance 0.39 · 11.1% (25 of 225 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.39 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.34 · 16.9% (38 of 225 decks)
- Ainok Bond-Kin relevance 0.36 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.35 · 14.7% (33 of 225 decks)
- Luminous Broodmoth relevance 0.35 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Rinoa Heartilly relevance 0.40 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Sovereign Okinec Ahau relevance 0.30 · 28.9% (65 of 225 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.33 · 17.8% (40 of 225 decks)
- Mikey & Leo, Chaos & Order relevance 0.36 · 12.4% (28 of 225 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.39 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.40 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Envoy of the Ancestors relevance 0.31 · 18.2% (41 of 225 decks)
- Bastion Protector relevance 0.31 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 0.39 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
All artifacts (49)
- Blitzball relevance 0.63 · 26.2% (59 of 225 decks)
- Liquimetal Coating relevance 0.68 · 13.3% (30 of 225 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.52 · 13.3% (30 of 225 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.33 · 48.0% (108 of 225 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.34 · 38.2% (86 of 225 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.33 · 35.6% (80 of 225 decks)
- Mycosynth Lattice relevance 0.46 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Strixhaven Stadium relevance 0.45 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- White Auracite relevance 0.38 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Summoning Materia relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.31 · 12.4% (28 of 225 decks)
- Contested Game Ball relevance 0.46 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.34 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Costume Closet relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.33 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.23 · 22.7% (51 of 225 decks)
- Andúril, Narsil Reforged relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.28 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Baseball Bat relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 36.0% (81 of 225 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.20 · 20.4% (46 of 225 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.19 · 15.6% (35 of 225 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Behemoth Sledge relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.22 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- S.H.I.E.L.D. Spy Kit relevance 0.33 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- The Wind Crystal relevance 0.20 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.17 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 68.9% (155 of 225 decks)
- Tome of Legends relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.26 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Animation Module relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 77.8% (175 of 225 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.46 · 44.9% (101 of 225 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.41 · 48.4% (109 of 225 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.48 · 18.2% (41 of 225 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.47 · 16.0% (36 of 225 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.25 · 71.1% (160 of 225 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.41 · 20.9% (47 of 225 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.30 · 49.8% (112 of 225 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.33 · 36.0% (81 of 225 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.31 · 37.8% (85 of 225 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.35 · 13.3% (30 of 225 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.39 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Leader's Talent relevance 0.35 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.23 · 25.8% (58 of 225 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.31 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.29 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.22 · 21.3% (48 of 225 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Warrior's Resolve relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.20 · 25.3% (57 of 225 decks)
- Summoner's Sending relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.20 · 23.1% (52 of 225 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.22 · 11.1% (25 of 225 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.21 · 12.0% (27 of 225 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.22 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Concerted Effort relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Super-Soldier Serum relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (25 of 225 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.17 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.16 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Duelist's Heritage relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Tale of Katara and Toph relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.13 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Noble Heritage relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Paladin Class relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
All instants (50)
- Blitzball Shot relevance 0.58 · 16.9% (38 of 225 decks)
- Yuna's Whistle relevance 0.52 · 17.8% (40 of 225 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.26 · 64.0% (144 of 225 decks)
- Protection Magic relevance 0.43 · 13.3% (30 of 225 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.41 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Destroy Evil relevance 0.39 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Ultimate Magic: Holy relevance 0.35 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.27 · 20.4% (46 of 225 decks)
- Take Up the Shield relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Battle Menu relevance 0.34 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Restoration Magic relevance 0.26 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.30 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.31 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.22 · 18.2% (41 of 225 decks)
- Duty Beyond Death relevance 0.27 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.22 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.20 · 23.1% (52 of 225 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.21 · 20.4% (46 of 225 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.26 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Auron's Inspiration relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.26 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.23 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Lightfoot Technique relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Pledge of Unity relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Fate of the Sun-Cryst relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.19 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.15 · 32.0% (72 of 225 decks)
- Fleeting Flight relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.21 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.13 · 36.0% (81 of 225 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.13 · 39.1% (88 of 225 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (25 of 225 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- You're Not Alone relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.08 · 59.6% (134 of 225 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Dromoka's Command relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.36 · 58.2% (131 of 225 decks)
- Collective Effort relevance 0.41 · 19.1% (43 of 225 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.49 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.36 · 16.9% (38 of 225 decks)
- Yuna's Decision relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.40 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Honor relevance 0.37 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- The Crystal's Chosen relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.20 · 44.9% (101 of 225 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (48 of 225 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.34 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.26 · 16.0% (36 of 225 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.31 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.23 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Practiced Offense relevance 0.31 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.29 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.27 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Commune with Beavers relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.23 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.16 · 34.2% (77 of 225 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.16 · 38.2% (86 of 225 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.14 · 44.9% (101 of 225 decks)
- Ultima relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.19 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Clash of the Eikons relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 50.7% (114 of 225 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.16 · 19.1% (43 of 225 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.19 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Basri's Solidarity relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Helping Hand relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Day of Judgment relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Aerith Rescue Mission relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Raise the Past relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Cleansing Nova relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.16 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Elspeth Resplendent relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.24 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Ajani Goldmane relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Ajani, Mentor of Heroes relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Ajani, Caller of the Pride relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
All utility lands (45)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.44 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.42 · 12.0% (27 of 225 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.32 · 32.4% (73 of 225 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.34 · 20.4% (46 of 225 decks)
- Capital City relevance 0.41 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Ishgard, the Holy See // Faith & Grief relevance 0.31 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.30 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.30 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.30 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- The Gold Saucer relevance 0.37 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.23 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.19 · 27.1% (61 of 225 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Clive's Hideaway relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 35.6% (80 of 225 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.19 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.18 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.17 · 31.6% (71 of 225 decks)
- Hidden Hideout relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.23 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.20 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.19 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.14 · 28.9% (65 of 225 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.17 · 13.8% (31 of 225 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.15 · 18.7% (42 of 225 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.15 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Kyoshi Village relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.12 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
All lands (49)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.25 · 23.1% (52 of 225 decks)
- Windurst, Federation Center relevance 0.30 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.25 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.24 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.24 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.18 · 30.7% (69 of 225 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.20 · 15.6% (35 of 225 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.19 · 22.2% (50 of 225 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.21 · 12.9% (29 of 225 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Etched Cornfield relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.22 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.17 · 18.2% (41 of 225 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.14 · 32.9% (74 of 225 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.12 · 44.4% (100 of 225 decks)
- Birnin Zana Plaza relevance 0.25 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.18 · 11.1% (25 of 225 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.13 · 35.6% (80 of 225 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.18 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.14 · 23.1% (52 of 225 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.11 · 40.9% (92 of 225 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.13 · 17.8% (40 of 225 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.14 · 12.0% (27 of 225 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.10 · 47.6% (107 of 225 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.10 · 37.8% (85 of 225 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.10 · 32.0% (72 of 225 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.13 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.07 · 55.1% (124 of 225 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.06 · 66.2% (149 of 225 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Thornglint Bridge relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 80.0% (180 of 225 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.01 · 95.1% (214 of 225 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 95.1% (214 of 225 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Wakka, Devoted Guardian, from 225 real Commander decks.