Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Split Decision relevance 0.71 · 86.2% (250 of 290 decks)
- Messenger Jays relevance 0.86 · 62.1% (180 of 290 decks)
- Orchard Elemental relevance 0.83 · 62.8% (182 of 290 decks)
- Coercive Portal relevance 0.77 · 69.3% (201 of 290 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.64 · 92.1% (267 of 290 decks)
- Emissary Green relevance 0.71 · 77.2% (224 of 290 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 0.67 · 82.4% (239 of 290 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.64 · 84.8% (246 of 290 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.62 · 89.3% (259 of 290 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 0.66 · 80.0% (232 of 290 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 0.60 · 90.3% (262 of 290 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 0.63 · 82.4% (239 of 290 decks)
- Model of Unity relevance 0.61 · 84.8% (246 of 290 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.59 · 90.3% (262 of 290 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.58 · 91.7% (266 of 290 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.58 · 65.9% (191 of 290 decks)
- Path of the Enigma relevance 0.85 · 25.2% (73 of 290 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.55 · 62.8% (182 of 290 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.58 · 54.8% (159 of 290 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.53 · 54.8% (159 of 290 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 0.69 · 28.6% (83 of 290 decks)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.52 · 55.2% (160 of 290 decks)
- Mirkwood Trapper relevance 0.56 · 43.1% (125 of 290 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.53 · 44.8% (130 of 290 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.42 · 66.6% (193 of 290 decks)
- Council's Deliberation relevance 0.59 · 31.7% (92 of 290 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.68 · 17.9% (52 of 290 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.49 · 46.9% (136 of 290 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.49 · 45.2% (131 of 290 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.64 · 17.6% (51 of 290 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.59 · 22.4% (65 of 290 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.47 · 43.8% (127 of 290 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.59 · 21.7% (63 of 290 decks)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.51 · 33.4% (97 of 290 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.47 · 40.3% (117 of 290 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.53 · 28.3% (82 of 290 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.52 · 28.6% (83 of 290 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.44 · 44.1% (128 of 290 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.48 · 35.9% (104 of 290 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.55 · 22.1% (64 of 290 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.50 · 29.3% (85 of 290 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.40 · 51.4% (149 of 290 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.48 · 33.8% (98 of 290 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.44 · 40.3% (117 of 290 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.45 · 34.8% (101 of 290 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.48 · 29.3% (85 of 290 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.51 · 22.1% (64 of 290 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.47 · 29.7% (86 of 290 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 0.49 · 23.1% (67 of 290 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.47 · 25.5% (74 of 290 decks)
Card Stacks
11
Card Stacks
11Showing 1-2 of 11
Cards like Elrond, Master of Healing
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
52% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Archdruid
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Archdruid 67%
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary 28%
- Imperious Perfect 22%
- Galadhrim Brigade 22%
- Canopy Tactician 3%
Other options: Elvish Clancaller
Cards like Elvish Mystic
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 67%
- Llanowar Elves 62%
- Fyndhorn Elves 29%
- Boreal Druid 1%
Other options: Druid of the Cowl, Greenweaver Druid, Nantuko Elder, Gyre Engineer, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Path of the Animist
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Warmaster
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 56% of other Simic decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 49%
- Cultivate 47%
- Kodama's Reach 14%
- Shared Roots 1%
Other options: Path to the Festival, Peregrination, They Went This Way, Explosive Vegetation, Verdant Mastery, Migration Path, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, Grow from the Ashes, Search for Tomorrow, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 62%
- Commander's Sphere 10%
Cards like Elvish Mariner
5.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Elven Chorus
9.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Marwyn, the Nurturer
7.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Farhaven Elf
4.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Farhaven Elf 20%
- Primeval Herald 1%
Other options: Simulacrum Shaper, Wild Wanderer, Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru, Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary, Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant, Yavimaya Granger
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Messenger Jays relevance 0.86 · 62.1% (180 of 290 decks)
- Orchard Elemental relevance 0.83 · 62.8% (182 of 290 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.64 · 92.1% (267 of 290 decks)
- Emissary Green relevance 0.71 · 77.2% (224 of 290 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 0.67 · 82.4% (239 of 290 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.58 · 91.7% (266 of 290 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.55 · 62.8% (182 of 290 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.58 · 54.8% (159 of 290 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.53 · 54.8% (159 of 290 decks)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.52 · 55.2% (160 of 290 decks)
- Mirkwood Trapper relevance 0.56 · 43.1% (125 of 290 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.53 · 44.8% (130 of 290 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.42 · 66.6% (193 of 290 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.49 · 45.2% (131 of 290 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.64 · 17.6% (51 of 290 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.47 · 43.8% (127 of 290 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.47 · 40.3% (117 of 290 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.53 · 28.3% (82 of 290 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.48 · 35.9% (104 of 290 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.50 · 29.3% (85 of 290 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.40 · 51.4% (149 of 290 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.48 · 33.8% (98 of 290 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.51 · 22.1% (64 of 290 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 0.49 · 23.1% (67 of 290 decks)
- Mirkwood Elk relevance 0.49 · 19.3% (56 of 290 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.47 · 22.4% (65 of 290 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.42 · 30.0% (87 of 290 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.44 · 18.3% (53 of 290 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.45 · 13.8% (40 of 290 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.35 · 37.6% (109 of 290 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.45 · 13.4% (39 of 290 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.30 · 49.7% (144 of 290 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.45 · 11.4% (33 of 290 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.48 · 9.0% (26 of 290 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.38 · 23.8% (69 of 290 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.40 · 16.6% (48 of 290 decks)
- Glorfindel, Dauntless Rescuer relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (30 of 290 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.45 · 9.0% (26 of 290 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (27 of 290 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.37 · 16.2% (47 of 290 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.36 · 19.0% (55 of 290 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.35 · 20.0% (58 of 290 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.33 · 26.2% (76 of 290 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.21 · 66.6% (193 of 290 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.36 · 12.4% (36 of 290 decks)
- Chance-Met Elves relevance 0.40 · 6.6% (19 of 290 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (13 of 290 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.33 · 10.3% (30 of 290 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.29 · 17.2% (50 of 290 decks)
- Winter Eladrin relevance 0.44 · 3.4% (10 of 290 decks)
Artifacts
31
Artifacts
31 Showing 1-10 of 31
Page size
All artifacts (31)
- Coercive Portal relevance 0.77 · 69.3% (201 of 290 decks)
- Model of Unity relevance 0.61 · 84.8% (246 of 290 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.68 · 17.9% (52 of 290 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.47 · 25.5% (74 of 290 decks)
- The Temporal Anchor relevance 0.47 · 17.2% (50 of 290 decks)
- Mirror of Galadriel relevance 0.44 · 19.7% (57 of 290 decks)
- Lothlórien Blade relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (49 of 290 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.38 · 16.6% (48 of 290 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.37 · 16.9% (49 of 290 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.33 · 8.6% (25 of 290 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (18 of 290 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (12 of 290 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.28 · 8.3% (24 of 290 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.37 · 3.4% (10 of 290 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.20 · 30.3% (88 of 290 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (29 of 290 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.20 · 23.8% (69 of 290 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.26 · 5.9% (17 of 290 decks)
- Hithlain Rope relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (8 of 290 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (8 of 290 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (11 of 290 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.15 · 20.3% (59 of 290 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.19 · 6.6% (19 of 290 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.15 · 13.1% (38 of 290 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 10.3% (30 of 290 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 62.1% (180 of 290 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 72.8% (211 of 290 decks)
Enchantments
33
Enchantments
33 Showing 1-10 of 33
Page size
All enchantments (33)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.51 · 33.4% (97 of 290 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.45 · 34.8% (101 of 290 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.48 · 29.3% (85 of 290 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.47 · 19.3% (56 of 290 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.39 · 23.8% (69 of 290 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.41 · 14.5% (42 of 290 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (27 of 290 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.37 · 4.8% (14 of 290 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.28 · 16.2% (47 of 290 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (9 of 290 decks)
- Fall of Gil-galad relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (12 of 290 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (9 of 290 decks)
- Upwelling relevance 0.41 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (17 of 290 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (8 of 290 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.22 · 6.6% (19 of 290 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (24 of 290 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (9 of 290 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (8 of 290 decks)
- Party Dude relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Awakening relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (19 of 290 decks)
- Down in the Valley relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (10 of 290 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (10 of 290 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (9 of 290 decks)
- In Search of Greatness relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.14 · 6.9% (20 of 290 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (8 of 290 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (9 of 290 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Split Decision relevance 0.71 · 86.2% (250 of 290 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.62 · 89.3% (259 of 290 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 0.66 · 80.0% (232 of 290 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 0.60 · 90.3% (262 of 290 decks)
- Council's Deliberation relevance 0.59 · 31.7% (92 of 290 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.49 · 46.9% (136 of 290 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.47 · 29.7% (86 of 290 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.33 · 35.2% (102 of 290 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.36 · 19.7% (57 of 290 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.33 · 12.4% (36 of 290 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.35 · 9.7% (28 of 290 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.40 · 4.5% (13 of 290 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.32 · 12.8% (37 of 290 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.34 · 8.6% (25 of 290 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.28 · 17.2% (50 of 290 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.32 · 5.9% (17 of 290 decks)
- Glorious Gale relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (14 of 290 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.28 · 10.3% (30 of 290 decks)
- Tribal Unity relevance 0.43 · 2.8% (8 of 290 decks)
- Out of Bounds relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Peel from Reality relevance 0.35 · 3.8% (11 of 290 decks)
- Intellectual Offering relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (9 of 290 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.19 · 30.3% (88 of 290 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.19 · 28.6% (83 of 290 decks)
- Learn from the Past relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (11 of 290 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (16 of 290 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.16 · 45.2% (131 of 290 decks)
- Words of Wisdom relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (8 of 290 decks)
- Wrong Turn relevance 0.35 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.17 · 25.9% (75 of 290 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.12 · 54.8% (159 of 290 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (11 of 290 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (10 of 290 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (19 of 290 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (13 of 290 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (14 of 290 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.18 · 9.0% (26 of 290 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.16 · 17.2% (50 of 290 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (16 of 290 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.15 · 14.1% (41 of 290 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (11 of 290 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.11 · 47.9% (139 of 290 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (17 of 290 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.11 · 39.7% (115 of 290 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.16 · 7.2% (21 of 290 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (8 of 290 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.16 · 6.9% (20 of 290 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.15 · 10.7% (31 of 290 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (9 of 290 decks)
Sorceries
39
Sorceries
39 Showing 1-10 of 39
Page size
All sorceries (39)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.64 · 84.8% (246 of 290 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 0.63 · 82.4% (239 of 290 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.59 · 90.3% (262 of 290 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.58 · 65.9% (191 of 290 decks)
- Path of the Enigma relevance 0.85 · 25.2% (73 of 290 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 0.69 · 28.6% (83 of 290 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.59 · 22.4% (65 of 290 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.59 · 21.7% (63 of 290 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.52 · 28.6% (83 of 290 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.44 · 44.1% (128 of 290 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.55 · 22.1% (64 of 290 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.44 · 40.3% (117 of 290 decks)
- Arwen's Gift relevance 0.44 · 14.8% (43 of 290 decks)
- The Ring Goes South relevance 0.47 · 9.0% (26 of 290 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.33 · 34.1% (99 of 290 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.38 · 16.2% (47 of 290 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.44 · 8.6% (25 of 290 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.34 · 21.0% (61 of 290 decks)
- Zndrsplt's Judgment relevance 0.47 · 4.5% (13 of 290 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.31 · 30.3% (88 of 290 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (18 of 290 decks)
- Rally the Galadhrim relevance 0.34 · 5.2% (15 of 290 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.24 · 21.7% (63 of 290 decks)
- Manifold Insights relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (16 of 290 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.14 · 48.6% (141 of 290 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (13 of 290 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 46.6% (135 of 290 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (14 of 290 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (9 of 290 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.14 · 16.2% (47 of 290 decks)
- Seeds of Renewal relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.14 · 17.9% (52 of 290 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (62 of 290 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (8 of 290 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.12 · 13.8% (40 of 290 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (9 of 290 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.14 · 2.8% (8 of 290 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
Planeswalkers
3
Planeswalkers
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All planeswalkers (3)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.37 · 19.3% (56 of 290 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (12 of 290 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
Utility Lands
29
Utility Lands
29 Showing 1-10 of 29
Page size
All utility lands (29)
- Rivendell relevance 0.41 · 47.6% (138 of 290 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.42 · 21.0% (61 of 290 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.40 · 7.9% (23 of 290 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.31 · 16.2% (47 of 290 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.34 · 9.7% (28 of 290 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.21 · 44.8% (130 of 290 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.28 · 8.3% (24 of 290 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.27 · 7.2% (21 of 290 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 14.5% (42 of 290 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.25 · 6.9% (20 of 290 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.19 · 22.8% (66 of 290 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.14 · 43.1% (125 of 290 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.17 · 13.8% (40 of 290 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (23 of 290 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (10 of 290 decks)
- Elvenking's Halls relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.18 · 5.2% (15 of 290 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 5.5% (16 of 290 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 12.4% (36 of 290 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 8.6% (25 of 290 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 47.2% (137 of 290 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (29 of 290 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.14 · 7.2% (21 of 290 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 8.6% (25 of 290 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.12 · 6.9% (20 of 290 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (10 of 290 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (9 of 290 decks)
Lands
33
Lands
33 Showing 1-10 of 33
Page size
All lands (33)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.30 · 11.0% (32 of 290 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (27 of 290 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (13 of 290 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.17 · 41.7% (121 of 290 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.21 · 18.3% (53 of 290 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.13 · 52.4% (152 of 290 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (13 of 290 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.12 · 48.3% (140 of 290 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.16 · 21.0% (61 of 290 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.11 · 54.1% (157 of 290 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.16 · 16.6% (48 of 290 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (12 of 290 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (13 of 290 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.16 · 12.4% (36 of 290 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.10 · 46.9% (136 of 290 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (24 of 290 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.16 · 10.7% (31 of 290 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (11 of 290 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.16 · 7.6% (22 of 290 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 11.0% (32 of 290 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 290 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.14 · 9.0% (26 of 290 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (16 of 290 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.07 · 69.3% (201 of 290 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.11 · 24.5% (71 of 290 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 13.1% (38 of 290 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (10 of 290 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 33.8% (98 of 290 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.08 · 35.9% (104 of 290 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (11 of 290 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 76.2% (221 of 290 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 83.8% (243 of 290 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 83.8% (243 of 290 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Erestor of the Council, from 290 real Commander decks.