Cards like Wall of Blossoms
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Wall of Blossoms 39%
- Wall of Omens 38%
- Elvish Visionary 33%
- Spirited Companion 32%
- Llanowar Visionary 16%
- Helpful Hunter 14%
- Gallant Citizen 4%
- Kindly Customer 4%
Other options: Carven Caryatid, Owlbear, Generous Stray, Roving Harper, Joraga Visionary, Kavu Climber, Multani's Acolyte, Rhox Oracle, Salt Road Packbeast, Pyknite, Search Party Captain, Striped Bears, Shaman of Spring, Arctic Wolves
Cards like Ephemerate
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Ephemerate 43%
- Cloudshift 25%
- Flicker of Fate 8%
- Acrobatic Maneuver 3%
- Justiciar's Portal 2%
- Scrollshift 2%
Other options: Liberate
Cards like Eerie Interlude
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Eerie Interlude 32%
- Lae'zel's Acrobatics 13%
- Ghostway 11%
Cards like Ronom Unicorn
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Ronom Unicorn 25%
- Capashen Unicorn 17%
Other options: Cathar Commando, Kithkin Spellduster, Westfold Rider, Uktabi Faerie, Caustic Caterpillar, Undergrowth Leopard, Shattered Acolyte, Inspired Insurgent, Thrashing Brontodon, Guerrilla Gorilla, Scavenger Folk, Elvish Scrapper, Viridian Zealot, Druid Lyrist, Keening Apparition, Voracious Varmint, Felidar Cub, Nova Cleric, Elvish Lyrist, Root Greevil, Kami of Ancient Law, Silverchase Fox, Elvish Hexhunter
Cards like Reclamation Sage
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Rambunctious Mutt, Viridian Shaman, Conclave Naturalists, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Teleportation Circle
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Felidar Guardian
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Wispweaver Angel, Saltskitter
Cards like Chord of Calling
3.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Eladamri's Call
2.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Selesnya decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Eladamri's Call 34%
- Worldly Tutor 18%
- Sylvan Tutor 3%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 33%
- Three Visits 26%
- Skyshroud Claim 5%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Field Trip, Glimpse the Core, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Eternal Witness
6.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Elvish Regrower, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Restoration Angel
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Farhaven Elf
19× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant, Simulacrum Shaper, Wild Wanderer, Yavimaya Granger, Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary
Cards like Hardened Scales
1.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Sol Ring
3.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 73% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.74 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Wood Elves
16× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Village Bell-Ringer
3.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
5.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Brood Monitor
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Nest Invader, Scion Summoner, Birthing Hulk
Cards like Knight of Autumn
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 20%
- Swiftfoot Boots 17%
All top picks (50)
- Blessed Sanctuary relevance 0.72 · 46.4% (512 of 1,104 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.75 · 39.4% (435 of 1,104 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 0.73 · 38.2% (422 of 1,104 decks)
- Brightmare relevance 0.75 · 36.4% (402 of 1,104 decks)
- Stonehorn Dignitary relevance 0.89 · 18.0% (199 of 1,104 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 0.82 · 25.4% (280 of 1,104 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.82 · 25.2% (278 of 1,104 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 0.76 · 30.5% (337 of 1,104 decks)
- Preston, the Vanisher relevance 0.81 · 23.7% (262 of 1,104 decks)
- Brood Monitor relevance 0.86 · 16.7% (184 of 1,104 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.62 · 48.7% (538 of 1,104 decks)
- Ronom Unicorn relevance 0.79 · 24.5% (271 of 1,104 decks)
- Inspiring Unicorn relevance 0.80 · 22.5% (248 of 1,104 decks)
- Workhorse relevance 0.87 · 14.5% (160 of 1,104 decks)
- Valorous Steed relevance 0.83 · 17.7% (195 of 1,104 decks)
- Loyal Unicorn relevance 0.65 · 39.7% (438 of 1,104 decks)
- Daybreak Charger relevance 0.82 · 17.1% (189 of 1,104 decks)
- Steadfast Unicorn relevance 0.79 · 21.3% (235 of 1,104 decks)
- Opaline Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 22.2% (245 of 1,104 decks)
- Thurid, Mare of Destiny relevance 0.77 · 21.8% (241 of 1,104 decks)
- Capashen Unicorn relevance 0.81 · 16.6% (183 of 1,104 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.60 · 43.0% (475 of 1,104 decks)
- Felidar Guardian relevance 0.70 · 26.9% (297 of 1,104 decks)
- Knight of Autumn relevance 0.62 · 39.9% (440 of 1,104 decks)
- Prized Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 17.8% (197 of 1,104 decks)
- Restoration Angel relevance 0.71 · 26.2% (289 of 1,104 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.65 · 32.4% (358 of 1,104 decks)
- Mesa Unicorn relevance 0.72 · 22.1% (244 of 1,104 decks)
- Nyxborn Unicorn relevance 0.74 · 19.8% (219 of 1,104 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.64 · 32.7% (361 of 1,104 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 0.75 · 17.0% (188 of 1,104 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.64 · 30.9% (341 of 1,104 decks)
- Noble Quarry relevance 0.75 · 14.9% (165 of 1,104 decks)
- Neighborhood Guardian relevance 0.79 · 12.5% (138 of 1,104 decks)
- Splendor Mare relevance 0.72 · 18.3% (202 of 1,104 decks)
- Benevolent Unicorn relevance 0.80 · 11.7% (129 of 1,104 decks)
- Captivating Unicorn relevance 0.76 · 13.6% (150 of 1,104 decks)
- Zebra Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 12.4% (137 of 1,104 decks)
- Professor Hojo relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (202 of 1,104 decks)
- Celestial Unicorn relevance 0.63 · 28.4% (314 of 1,104 decks)
- Abdel Adrian, Gorion's Ward relevance 0.77 · 12.2% (135 of 1,104 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.69 · 19.2% (212 of 1,104 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.54 · 42.0% (464 of 1,104 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 0.64 · 25.2% (278 of 1,104 decks)
- Boreas Charger relevance 0.77 · 11.0% (121 of 1,104 decks)
- Lonesome Unicorn // Rider in Need relevance 0.78 · 10.4% (115 of 1,104 decks)
- Skyclave Apparition relevance 0.62 · 26.1% (288 of 1,104 decks)
- Karmic Guide relevance 0.62 · 24.5% (270 of 1,104 decks)
- Lae'zel's Acrobatics relevance 0.71 · 12.7% (140 of 1,104 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.64 · 19.5% (215 of 1,104 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.75 · 39.4% (435 of 1,104 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 0.73 · 38.2% (422 of 1,104 decks)
- Brightmare relevance 0.75 · 36.4% (402 of 1,104 decks)
- Stonehorn Dignitary relevance 0.89 · 18.0% (199 of 1,104 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 0.82 · 25.4% (280 of 1,104 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 0.76 · 30.5% (337 of 1,104 decks)
- Preston, the Vanisher relevance 0.81 · 23.7% (262 of 1,104 decks)
- Brood Monitor relevance 0.86 · 16.7% (184 of 1,104 decks)
- Ronom Unicorn relevance 0.79 · 24.5% (271 of 1,104 decks)
- Inspiring Unicorn relevance 0.80 · 22.5% (248 of 1,104 decks)
- Workhorse relevance 0.87 · 14.5% (160 of 1,104 decks)
- Valorous Steed relevance 0.83 · 17.7% (195 of 1,104 decks)
- Loyal Unicorn relevance 0.65 · 39.7% (438 of 1,104 decks)
- Daybreak Charger relevance 0.82 · 17.1% (189 of 1,104 decks)
- Steadfast Unicorn relevance 0.79 · 21.3% (235 of 1,104 decks)
- Opaline Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 22.2% (245 of 1,104 decks)
- Thurid, Mare of Destiny relevance 0.77 · 21.8% (241 of 1,104 decks)
- Capashen Unicorn relevance 0.81 · 16.6% (183 of 1,104 decks)
- Felidar Guardian relevance 0.70 · 26.9% (297 of 1,104 decks)
- Knight of Autumn relevance 0.62 · 39.9% (440 of 1,104 decks)
- Prized Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 17.8% (197 of 1,104 decks)
- Restoration Angel relevance 0.71 · 26.2% (289 of 1,104 decks)
- Mesa Unicorn relevance 0.72 · 22.1% (244 of 1,104 decks)
- Nyxborn Unicorn relevance 0.74 · 19.8% (219 of 1,104 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.64 · 32.7% (361 of 1,104 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 0.75 · 17.0% (188 of 1,104 decks)
- Noble Quarry relevance 0.75 · 14.9% (165 of 1,104 decks)
- Neighborhood Guardian relevance 0.79 · 12.5% (138 of 1,104 decks)
- Splendor Mare relevance 0.72 · 18.3% (202 of 1,104 decks)
- Benevolent Unicorn relevance 0.80 · 11.7% (129 of 1,104 decks)
- Captivating Unicorn relevance 0.76 · 13.6% (150 of 1,104 decks)
- Zebra Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 12.4% (137 of 1,104 decks)
- Professor Hojo relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (202 of 1,104 decks)
- Celestial Unicorn relevance 0.63 · 28.4% (314 of 1,104 decks)
- Abdel Adrian, Gorion's Ward relevance 0.77 · 12.2% (135 of 1,104 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.69 · 19.2% (212 of 1,104 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.54 · 42.0% (464 of 1,104 decks)
- Boreas Charger relevance 0.77 · 11.0% (121 of 1,104 decks)
- Lonesome Unicorn // Rider in Need relevance 0.78 · 10.4% (115 of 1,104 decks)
- Skyclave Apparition relevance 0.62 · 26.1% (288 of 1,104 decks)
- Karmic Guide relevance 0.62 · 24.5% (270 of 1,104 decks)
- Majestic Auricorn relevance 0.76 · 9.1% (101 of 1,104 decks)
- Village Bell-Ringer relevance 0.57 · 30.1% (332 of 1,104 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.65 · 17.8% (197 of 1,104 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.66 · 15.8% (174 of 1,104 decks)
- Glorious Protector relevance 0.73 · 10.6% (117 of 1,104 decks)
- Regal Unicorn relevance 0.78 · 6.9% (76 of 1,104 decks)
- Revered Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 6.8% (75 of 1,104 decks)
- Wishmonger relevance 0.78 · 6.3% (69 of 1,104 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (321 of 1,104 decks)
All artifacts (45)
- Heartstone relevance 0.82 · 25.2% (278 of 1,104 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.62 · 48.7% (538 of 1,104 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.64 · 19.5% (215 of 1,104 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.65 · 10.8% (119 of 1,104 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.65 · 7.4% (82 of 1,104 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.61 · 9.6% (106 of 1,104 decks)
- Scroll of Fate relevance 0.74 · 3.8% (42 of 1,104 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (94 of 1,104 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.32 · 21.6% (238 of 1,104 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (51 of 1,104 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (56 of 1,104 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (55 of 1,104 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (58 of 1,104 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (59 of 1,104 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.48 · 3.4% (37 of 1,104 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.28 · 19.7% (218 of 1,104 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.28 · 18.3% (202 of 1,104 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (70 of 1,104 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.42 · 4.0% (44 of 1,104 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.34 · 7.5% (83 of 1,104 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.45 · 3.4% (38 of 1,104 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.33 · 7.0% (77 of 1,104 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.25 · 21.0% (232 of 1,104 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (58 of 1,104 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.31 · 6.9% (76 of 1,104 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (55 of 1,104 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.45 · 2.7% (30 of 1,104 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (61 of 1,104 decks)
- Pearl Medallion relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (46 of 1,104 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.45 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.32 · 4.1% (45 of 1,104 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.21 · 17.1% (189 of 1,104 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (48 of 1,104 decks)
- Well of Lost Dreams relevance 0.29 · 3.7% (41 of 1,104 decks)
- Caduceus, Staff of Hermes relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (29 of 1,104 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.35 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (33 of 1,104 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.11 · 59.5% (657 of 1,104 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (41 of 1,104 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (30 of 1,104 decks)
- The Wind Crystal relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (27 of 1,104 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (29 of 1,104 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.06 · 79.3% (875 of 1,104 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Blessed Sanctuary relevance 0.72 · 46.4% (512 of 1,104 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.64 · 30.9% (341 of 1,104 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.60 · 20.5% (226 of 1,104 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.38 · 40.7% (449 of 1,104 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 0.57 · 7.5% (83 of 1,104 decks)
- Far Traveler relevance 0.58 · 4.5% (50 of 1,104 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.49 · 6.2% (68 of 1,104 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.44 · 11.2% (124 of 1,104 decks)
- Swift Reconfiguration relevance 0.48 · 6.5% (72 of 1,104 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.38 · 18.0% (199 of 1,104 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.33 · 30.4% (336 of 1,104 decks)
- Sigarda's Summons relevance 0.46 · 7.3% (81 of 1,104 decks)
- Aid from the Cowl relevance 0.61 · 3.3% (36 of 1,104 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (54 of 1,104 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.33 · 16.2% (179 of 1,104 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.30 · 25.8% (285 of 1,104 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.38 · 6.2% (68 of 1,104 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.33 · 12.7% (140 of 1,104 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.39 · 5.3% (58 of 1,104 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.42 · 4.2% (46 of 1,104 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.36 · 6.6% (73 of 1,104 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.29 · 14.6% (161 of 1,104 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.27 · 20.3% (224 of 1,104 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.29 · 14.2% (157 of 1,104 decks)
- Tocasia's Welcome relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (62 of 1,104 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.29 · 8.7% (96 of 1,104 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.23 · 22.3% (246 of 1,104 decks)
- Soul Snare relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (31 of 1,104 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (47 of 1,104 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.27 · 10.1% (111 of 1,104 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.25 · 13.0% (144 of 1,104 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.36 · 3.9% (43 of 1,104 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (158 of 1,104 decks)
- Ajani's Welcome relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (45 of 1,104 decks)
- The Princess Takes Flight relevance 0.41 · 2.8% (31 of 1,104 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (39 of 1,104 decks)
- True Conviction relevance 0.35 · 3.5% (39 of 1,104 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (118 of 1,104 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (32 of 1,104 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (38 of 1,104 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (60 of 1,104 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (47 of 1,104 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (36 of 1,104 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (44 of 1,104 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.30 · 3.2% (35 of 1,104 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (73 of 1,104 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (45 of 1,104 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (42 of 1,104 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (48 of 1,104 decks)
- Privileged Position relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (27 of 1,104 decks)
All instants (50)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.60 · 43.0% (475 of 1,104 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.65 · 32.4% (358 of 1,104 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 0.64 · 25.2% (278 of 1,104 decks)
- Lae'zel's Acrobatics relevance 0.71 · 12.7% (140 of 1,104 decks)
- Ghostway relevance 0.68 · 11.4% (126 of 1,104 decks)
- Semester's End relevance 0.64 · 12.1% (134 of 1,104 decks)
- Flicker of Fate relevance 0.60 · 7.6% (84 of 1,104 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 0.48 · 9.0% (99 of 1,104 decks)
- Cosmic Intervention relevance 0.56 · 4.2% (46 of 1,104 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.36 · 17.3% (191 of 1,104 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (60 of 1,104 decks)
- Pledge of Unity relevance 0.43 · 8.2% (90 of 1,104 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.30 · 33.5% (370 of 1,104 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.32 · 18.0% (199 of 1,104 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.37 · 9.2% (102 of 1,104 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.37 · 7.3% (81 of 1,104 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (78 of 1,104 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.29 · 18.8% (207 of 1,104 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.28 · 20.7% (228 of 1,104 decks)
- Acrobatic Maneuver relevance 0.53 · 2.8% (31 of 1,104 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.35 · 7.2% (80 of 1,104 decks)
- Rite of Harmony relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (70 of 1,104 decks)
- Personify relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (42 of 1,104 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.45 · 3.2% (35 of 1,104 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.35 · 4.6% (51 of 1,104 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.33 · 5.4% (60 of 1,104 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (105 of 1,104 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.28 · 9.8% (108 of 1,104 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (147 of 1,104 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.26 · 12.7% (140 of 1,104 decks)
- Pulse of Murasa relevance 0.46 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (58 of 1,104 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.29 · 6.7% (74 of 1,104 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (56 of 1,104 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.38 · 3.4% (37 of 1,104 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.27 · 8.2% (90 of 1,104 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.20 · 25.6% (283 of 1,104 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.25 · 9.7% (107 of 1,104 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.38 · 3.0% (33 of 1,104 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.18 · 31.4% (347 of 1,104 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (27 of 1,104 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.17 · 32.2% (356 of 1,104 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (38 of 1,104 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (32 of 1,104 decks)
- Erode relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (31 of 1,104 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.11 · 54.5% (602 of 1,104 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (35 of 1,104 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.08 · 64.7% (714 of 1,104 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (31 of 1,104 decks)
All sorceries (38)
- Another Round relevance 0.66 · 7.2% (80 of 1,104 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (92 of 1,104 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.39 · 15.1% (167 of 1,104 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (98 of 1,104 decks)
- Daydream relevance 0.56 · 3.8% (42 of 1,104 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.40 · 9.2% (102 of 1,104 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.39 · 9.5% (105 of 1,104 decks)
- Storm Herd relevance 0.38 · 10.0% (110 of 1,104 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.47 · 4.2% (46 of 1,104 decks)
- Cleansing Nova relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (65 of 1,104 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.41 · 4.3% (48 of 1,104 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.29 · 14.9% (164 of 1,104 decks)
- Morningtide's Light relevance 0.46 · 3.5% (39 of 1,104 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (54 of 1,104 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.31 · 11.3% (125 of 1,104 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.25 · 25.7% (284 of 1,104 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.34 · 4.9% (54 of 1,104 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.24 · 23.1% (255 of 1,104 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.36 · 4.3% (48 of 1,104 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.48 · 2.4% (27 of 1,104 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (54 of 1,104 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.30 · 5.4% (60 of 1,104 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.25 · 12.7% (140 of 1,104 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.21 · 23.9% (264 of 1,104 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (68 of 1,104 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (105 of 1,104 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (368 of 1,104 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (55 of 1,104 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.20 · 25.4% (280 of 1,104 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (32 of 1,104 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.38 · 2.6% (29 of 1,104 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.15 · 34.2% (378 of 1,104 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (32 of 1,104 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (43 of 1,104 decks)
- Split Up relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (29 of 1,104 decks)
- Fumigate relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (33 of 1,104 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (44 of 1,104 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (76 of 1,104 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- The Eternal Wanderer relevance 0.52 · 5.3% (59 of 1,104 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (56 of 1,104 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (50 of 1,104 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.45 · 11.6% (128 of 1,104 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.34 · 23.4% (258 of 1,104 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.40 · 5.8% (64 of 1,104 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.33 · 11.8% (130 of 1,104 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.28 · 22.5% (248 of 1,104 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.37 · 5.5% (61 of 1,104 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.34 · 9.0% (99 of 1,104 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.41 · 4.3% (47 of 1,104 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.30 · 12.6% (139 of 1,104 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.26 · 23.0% (254 of 1,104 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (42 of 1,104 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.26 · 22.5% (248 of 1,104 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.26 · 22.9% (253 of 1,104 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.26 · 20.6% (227 of 1,104 decks)
- Bretagard Stronghold relevance 0.42 · 3.7% (41 of 1,104 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.31 · 9.6% (106 of 1,104 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.39 · 4.0% (44 of 1,104 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.26 · 17.2% (190 of 1,104 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.22 · 29.2% (322 of 1,104 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.24 · 19.9% (220 of 1,104 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.36 · 4.2% (46 of 1,104 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (43 of 1,104 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.22 · 25.1% (277 of 1,104 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (54 of 1,104 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.43 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
- Blighted Steppe relevance 0.43 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (77 of 1,104 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.37 · 3.4% (37 of 1,104 decks)
- Emeria, the Sky Ruin relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (38 of 1,104 decks)
- Idyllic Grange relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (30 of 1,104 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (78 of 1,104 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (85 of 1,104 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.39 · 2.7% (30 of 1,104 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (35 of 1,104 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (43 of 1,104 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.19 · 23.6% (260 of 1,104 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.36 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (44 of 1,104 decks)
- Kabira Takedown // Kabira Plateau relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (27 of 1,104 decks)
- Razorgrass Ambush // Razorgrass Field relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (37 of 1,104 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (31 of 1,104 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (31 of 1,104 decks)
- Castle Ardenvale relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (40 of 1,104 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (37 of 1,104 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (37 of 1,104 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (48 of 1,104 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (88 of 1,104 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (35 of 1,104 decks)
All lands (50)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.39 · 9.8% (108 of 1,104 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.38 · 8.6% (95 of 1,104 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.36 · 11.2% (124 of 1,104 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.37 · 10.1% (111 of 1,104 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.37 · 9.2% (102 of 1,104 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.37 · 8.8% (97 of 1,104 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.36 · 9.3% (103 of 1,104 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.36 · 9.7% (107 of 1,104 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.36 · 9.3% (103 of 1,104 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.29 · 20.2% (223 of 1,104 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.30 · 18.6% (205 of 1,104 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.38 · 5.2% (57 of 1,104 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.37 · 6.2% (68 of 1,104 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (99 of 1,104 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.36 · 7.4% (82 of 1,104 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.37 · 5.2% (57 of 1,104 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.31 · 12.3% (136 of 1,104 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.32 · 11.1% (123 of 1,104 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.38 · 4.7% (52 of 1,104 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.30 · 12.0% (133 of 1,104 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.24 · 25.8% (285 of 1,104 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (58 of 1,104 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (45 of 1,104 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.36 · 4.3% (47 of 1,104 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (55 of 1,104 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 31.0% (342 of 1,104 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.23 · 19.5% (215 of 1,104 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (42 of 1,104 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.19 · 35.1% (388 of 1,104 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (97 of 1,104 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.23 · 15.1% (167 of 1,104 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (56 of 1,104 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.20 · 28.5% (315 of 1,104 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (138 of 1,104 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.21 · 16.8% (185 of 1,104 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.16 · 40.2% (444 of 1,104 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.16 · 43.1% (476 of 1,104 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (48 of 1,104 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.13 · 56.8% (627 of 1,104 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.17 · 30.5% (337 of 1,104 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.15 · 41.7% (460 of 1,104 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (32 of 1,104 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.14 · 34.7% (383 of 1,104 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (35 of 1,104 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (27 of 1,104 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.10 · 54.1% (597 of 1,104 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.08 · 59.2% (654 of 1,104 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 79.3% (876 of 1,104 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.02 · 90.2% (996 of 1,104 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 89.9% (992 of 1,104 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Emiel the Blessed, from 1,104 real Commander decks.