Cards like Wall of Blossoms
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Wall of Blossoms 39%
- Wall of Omens 38%
- Elvish Visionary 33%
- Spirited Companion 32%
- Llanowar Visionary 16%
- Helpful Hunter 14%
- Gallant Citizen 4%
- Kindly Customer 4%
Other options: Carven Caryatid, Owlbear, Generous Stray, Roving Harper, Joraga Visionary, Kavu Climber, Multani's Acolyte, Rhox Oracle, Salt Road Packbeast, Pyknite, Search Party Captain, Striped Bears, Shaman of Spring, Arctic Wolves
Cards like Ephemerate
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Ephemerate 43%
- Cloudshift 25%
- Flicker of Fate 8%
- Acrobatic Maneuver 3%
- Justiciar's Portal 2%
- Scrollshift 2%
Other options: Liberate
Cards like Eerie Interlude
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Eerie Interlude 32%
- Lae'zel's Acrobatics 13%
- Ghostway 11%
Cards like Ronom Unicorn
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Ronom Unicorn 25%
- Capashen Unicorn 17%
Other options: Cathar Commando, Kithkin Spellduster, Westfold Rider, Uktabi Faerie, Caustic Caterpillar, Undergrowth Leopard, Shattered Acolyte, Inspired Insurgent, Thrashing Brontodon, Guerrilla Gorilla, Scavenger Folk, Elvish Scrapper, Viridian Zealot, Druid Lyrist, Keening Apparition, Voracious Varmint, Felidar Cub, Nova Cleric, Elvish Lyrist, Root Greevil, Kami of Ancient Law, Silverchase Fox, Elvish Hexhunter
Cards like Reclamation Sage
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Rambunctious Mutt, Viridian Shaman, Conclave Naturalists, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Teleportation Circle
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Felidar Guardian
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Wispweaver Angel, Saltskitter
Cards like Chord of Calling
3.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Eladamri's Call
2.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Selesnya decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Eladamri's Call 33%
- Worldly Tutor 18%
- Sylvan Tutor 3%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 33%
- Three Visits 26%
- Skyshroud Claim 5%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Field Trip, Glimpse the Core, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Eternal Witness
6.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Elvish Regrower, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Restoration Angel
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Farhaven Elf
19× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant, Wild Wanderer, Simulacrum Shaper, Yavimaya Granger, Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary
Cards like Hardened Scales
1.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Sol Ring
3.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 73% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.74 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Wood Elves
16× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Village Bell-Ringer
3.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
5.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Brood Monitor
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Nest Invader, Scion Summoner, Birthing Hulk
Cards like Knight of Autumn
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 20%
- Swiftfoot Boots 17%
All top picks (50)
- Blessed Sanctuary relevance 0.72 · 46.2% (509 of 1,102 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.75 · 39.4% (434 of 1,102 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 0.73 · 38.2% (421 of 1,102 decks)
- Brightmare relevance 0.75 · 36.3% (400 of 1,102 decks)
- Stonehorn Dignitary relevance 0.89 · 18.1% (199 of 1,102 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.82 · 25.2% (278 of 1,102 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 0.82 · 25.3% (279 of 1,102 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 0.76 · 30.5% (336 of 1,102 decks)
- Preston, the Vanisher relevance 0.81 · 23.8% (262 of 1,102 decks)
- Brood Monitor relevance 0.86 · 16.7% (184 of 1,102 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.62 · 48.7% (537 of 1,102 decks)
- Ronom Unicorn relevance 0.79 · 24.5% (270 of 1,102 decks)
- Inspiring Unicorn relevance 0.80 · 22.4% (247 of 1,102 decks)
- Workhorse relevance 0.87 · 14.5% (160 of 1,102 decks)
- Valorous Steed relevance 0.83 · 17.6% (194 of 1,102 decks)
- Loyal Unicorn relevance 0.65 · 39.7% (437 of 1,102 decks)
- Daybreak Charger relevance 0.82 · 17.1% (188 of 1,102 decks)
- Steadfast Unicorn relevance 0.79 · 21.3% (235 of 1,102 decks)
- Opaline Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 22.1% (244 of 1,102 decks)
- Thurid, Mare of Destiny relevance 0.76 · 21.8% (240 of 1,102 decks)
- Capashen Unicorn relevance 0.81 · 16.6% (183 of 1,102 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.60 · 43.0% (474 of 1,102 decks)
- Felidar Guardian relevance 0.71 · 27.0% (297 of 1,102 decks)
- Knight of Autumn relevance 0.62 · 39.8% (439 of 1,102 decks)
- Prized Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 17.8% (196 of 1,102 decks)
- Restoration Angel relevance 0.71 · 26.2% (289 of 1,102 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.65 · 32.5% (358 of 1,102 decks)
- Mesa Unicorn relevance 0.72 · 22.1% (244 of 1,102 decks)
- Nyxborn Unicorn relevance 0.73 · 19.8% (218 of 1,102 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.64 · 32.7% (360 of 1,102 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 0.75 · 17.1% (188 of 1,102 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.64 · 30.9% (341 of 1,102 decks)
- Noble Quarry relevance 0.75 · 15.0% (165 of 1,102 decks)
- Neighborhood Guardian relevance 0.79 · 12.4% (137 of 1,102 decks)
- Splendor Mare relevance 0.72 · 18.3% (202 of 1,102 decks)
- Benevolent Unicorn relevance 0.80 · 11.7% (129 of 1,102 decks)
- Captivating Unicorn relevance 0.76 · 13.6% (150 of 1,102 decks)
- Professor Hojo relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (202 of 1,102 decks)
- Zebra Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 12.4% (137 of 1,102 decks)
- Celestial Unicorn relevance 0.63 · 28.4% (313 of 1,102 decks)
- Abdel Adrian, Gorion's Ward relevance 0.77 · 12.3% (135 of 1,102 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.54 · 42.2% (465 of 1,102 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.69 · 19.1% (211 of 1,102 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 0.64 · 25.2% (278 of 1,102 decks)
- Boreas Charger relevance 0.77 · 10.9% (120 of 1,102 decks)
- Lonesome Unicorn // Rider in Need relevance 0.78 · 10.3% (114 of 1,102 decks)
- Skyclave Apparition relevance 0.62 · 26.2% (289 of 1,102 decks)
- Karmic Guide relevance 0.62 · 24.4% (269 of 1,102 decks)
- Lae'zel's Acrobatics relevance 0.71 · 12.7% (140 of 1,102 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.64 · 19.5% (215 of 1,102 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.75 · 39.4% (434 of 1,102 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 0.73 · 38.2% (421 of 1,102 decks)
- Brightmare relevance 0.75 · 36.3% (400 of 1,102 decks)
- Stonehorn Dignitary relevance 0.89 · 18.1% (199 of 1,102 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 0.82 · 25.3% (279 of 1,102 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 0.76 · 30.5% (336 of 1,102 decks)
- Preston, the Vanisher relevance 0.81 · 23.8% (262 of 1,102 decks)
- Brood Monitor relevance 0.86 · 16.7% (184 of 1,102 decks)
- Ronom Unicorn relevance 0.79 · 24.5% (270 of 1,102 decks)
- Inspiring Unicorn relevance 0.80 · 22.4% (247 of 1,102 decks)
- Workhorse relevance 0.87 · 14.5% (160 of 1,102 decks)
- Valorous Steed relevance 0.83 · 17.6% (194 of 1,102 decks)
- Loyal Unicorn relevance 0.65 · 39.7% (437 of 1,102 decks)
- Daybreak Charger relevance 0.82 · 17.1% (188 of 1,102 decks)
- Steadfast Unicorn relevance 0.79 · 21.3% (235 of 1,102 decks)
- Opaline Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 22.1% (244 of 1,102 decks)
- Thurid, Mare of Destiny relevance 0.76 · 21.8% (240 of 1,102 decks)
- Capashen Unicorn relevance 0.81 · 16.6% (183 of 1,102 decks)
- Felidar Guardian relevance 0.71 · 27.0% (297 of 1,102 decks)
- Knight of Autumn relevance 0.62 · 39.8% (439 of 1,102 decks)
- Prized Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 17.8% (196 of 1,102 decks)
- Restoration Angel relevance 0.71 · 26.2% (289 of 1,102 decks)
- Mesa Unicorn relevance 0.72 · 22.1% (244 of 1,102 decks)
- Nyxborn Unicorn relevance 0.73 · 19.8% (218 of 1,102 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.64 · 32.7% (360 of 1,102 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 0.75 · 17.1% (188 of 1,102 decks)
- Noble Quarry relevance 0.75 · 15.0% (165 of 1,102 decks)
- Neighborhood Guardian relevance 0.79 · 12.4% (137 of 1,102 decks)
- Splendor Mare relevance 0.72 · 18.3% (202 of 1,102 decks)
- Benevolent Unicorn relevance 0.80 · 11.7% (129 of 1,102 decks)
- Captivating Unicorn relevance 0.76 · 13.6% (150 of 1,102 decks)
- Professor Hojo relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (202 of 1,102 decks)
- Zebra Unicorn relevance 0.77 · 12.4% (137 of 1,102 decks)
- Celestial Unicorn relevance 0.63 · 28.4% (313 of 1,102 decks)
- Abdel Adrian, Gorion's Ward relevance 0.77 · 12.3% (135 of 1,102 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.54 · 42.2% (465 of 1,102 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.69 · 19.1% (211 of 1,102 decks)
- Boreas Charger relevance 0.77 · 10.9% (120 of 1,102 decks)
- Lonesome Unicorn // Rider in Need relevance 0.78 · 10.3% (114 of 1,102 decks)
- Skyclave Apparition relevance 0.62 · 26.2% (289 of 1,102 decks)
- Karmic Guide relevance 0.62 · 24.4% (269 of 1,102 decks)
- Village Bell-Ringer relevance 0.57 · 30.2% (333 of 1,102 decks)
- Majestic Auricorn relevance 0.76 · 9.2% (101 of 1,102 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.65 · 17.8% (196 of 1,102 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.66 · 15.8% (174 of 1,102 decks)
- Glorious Protector relevance 0.73 · 10.6% (117 of 1,102 decks)
- Regal Unicorn relevance 0.78 · 6.9% (76 of 1,102 decks)
- Revered Unicorn relevance 0.78 · 6.8% (75 of 1,102 decks)
- Wishmonger relevance 0.78 · 6.3% (69 of 1,102 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (321 of 1,102 decks)
All artifacts (45)
- Heartstone relevance 0.82 · 25.2% (278 of 1,102 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.62 · 48.7% (537 of 1,102 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.64 · 19.5% (215 of 1,102 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.65 · 10.8% (119 of 1,102 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.65 · 7.4% (82 of 1,102 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.61 · 9.5% (105 of 1,102 decks)
- Scroll of Fate relevance 0.74 · 3.8% (42 of 1,102 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (94 of 1,102 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.32 · 21.5% (237 of 1,102 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (51 of 1,102 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (56 of 1,102 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (55 of 1,102 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (58 of 1,102 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.37 · 5.4% (59 of 1,102 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.48 · 3.4% (37 of 1,102 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.28 · 19.7% (217 of 1,102 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.28 · 18.2% (201 of 1,102 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.35 · 6.4% (70 of 1,102 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.42 · 4.0% (44 of 1,102 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.34 · 7.5% (83 of 1,102 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.45 · 3.4% (38 of 1,102 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.33 · 7.0% (77 of 1,102 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.25 · 20.9% (230 of 1,102 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (58 of 1,102 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (75 of 1,102 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (55 of 1,102 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.45 · 2.7% (30 of 1,102 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (61 of 1,102 decks)
- Pearl Medallion relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (46 of 1,102 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.45 · 2.5% (28 of 1,102 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.21 · 17.2% (189 of 1,102 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (44 of 1,102 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (48 of 1,102 decks)
- Well of Lost Dreams relevance 0.29 · 3.7% (41 of 1,102 decks)
- Caduceus, Staff of Hermes relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (29 of 1,102 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.35 · 2.5% (28 of 1,102 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (33 of 1,102 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (28 of 1,102 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.11 · 59.4% (655 of 1,102 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (28 of 1,102 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (41 of 1,102 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (30 of 1,102 decks)
- The Wind Crystal relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (27 of 1,102 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (29 of 1,102 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.06 · 79.2% (873 of 1,102 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Blessed Sanctuary relevance 0.72 · 46.2% (509 of 1,102 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.64 · 30.9% (341 of 1,102 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.60 · 20.5% (226 of 1,102 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.38 · 40.7% (448 of 1,102 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 0.57 · 7.5% (83 of 1,102 decks)
- Far Traveler relevance 0.58 · 4.5% (50 of 1,102 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.49 · 6.2% (68 of 1,102 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.44 · 11.3% (124 of 1,102 decks)
- Swift Reconfiguration relevance 0.48 · 6.5% (72 of 1,102 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.38 · 18.1% (199 of 1,102 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.33 · 30.3% (334 of 1,102 decks)
- Sigarda's Summons relevance 0.46 · 7.4% (81 of 1,102 decks)
- Aid from the Cowl relevance 0.61 · 3.3% (36 of 1,102 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (54 of 1,102 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.33 · 16.2% (179 of 1,102 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.30 · 25.8% (284 of 1,102 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.38 · 6.2% (68 of 1,102 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.33 · 12.7% (140 of 1,102 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.39 · 5.3% (58 of 1,102 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.42 · 4.2% (46 of 1,102 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.36 · 6.6% (73 of 1,102 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.29 · 14.5% (160 of 1,102 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.27 · 20.2% (223 of 1,102 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.29 · 14.2% (157 of 1,102 decks)
- Tocasia's Welcome relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (62 of 1,102 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.29 · 8.7% (96 of 1,102 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.23 · 22.2% (245 of 1,102 decks)
- Soul Snare relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (31 of 1,102 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (47 of 1,102 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.27 · 10.1% (111 of 1,102 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.25 · 13.1% (144 of 1,102 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.36 · 3.9% (43 of 1,102 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (158 of 1,102 decks)
- Ajani's Welcome relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (44 of 1,102 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (39 of 1,102 decks)
- The Princess Takes Flight relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (30 of 1,102 decks)
- True Conviction relevance 0.35 · 3.5% (39 of 1,102 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (118 of 1,102 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (32 of 1,102 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (38 of 1,102 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (60 of 1,102 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (47 of 1,102 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (36 of 1,102 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (44 of 1,102 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.30 · 3.2% (35 of 1,102 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (45 of 1,102 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (73 of 1,102 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (42 of 1,102 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (48 of 1,102 decks)
- Privileged Position relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (27 of 1,102 decks)
All instants (50)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.60 · 43.0% (474 of 1,102 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.65 · 32.5% (358 of 1,102 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 0.64 · 25.2% (278 of 1,102 decks)
- Lae'zel's Acrobatics relevance 0.71 · 12.7% (140 of 1,102 decks)
- Ghostway relevance 0.68 · 11.4% (126 of 1,102 decks)
- Semester's End relevance 0.64 · 12.1% (133 of 1,102 decks)
- Flicker of Fate relevance 0.60 · 7.6% (84 of 1,102 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (98 of 1,102 decks)
- Cosmic Intervention relevance 0.57 · 4.2% (46 of 1,102 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.36 · 17.3% (191 of 1,102 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (60 of 1,102 decks)
- Pledge of Unity relevance 0.43 · 8.2% (90 of 1,102 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.30 · 33.5% (369 of 1,102 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.32 · 18.1% (199 of 1,102 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.37 · 9.3% (102 of 1,102 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.37 · 7.4% (81 of 1,102 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (78 of 1,102 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.29 · 18.8% (207 of 1,102 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.28 · 20.7% (228 of 1,102 decks)
- Acrobatic Maneuver relevance 0.53 · 2.8% (31 of 1,102 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (80 of 1,102 decks)
- Rite of Harmony relevance 0.36 · 6.4% (70 of 1,102 decks)
- Personify relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (42 of 1,102 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.45 · 3.2% (35 of 1,102 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.35 · 4.6% (51 of 1,102 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.33 · 5.4% (60 of 1,102 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (105 of 1,102 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.28 · 9.8% (108 of 1,102 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.26 · 12.7% (140 of 1,102 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.26 · 13.2% (146 of 1,102 decks)
- Pulse of Murasa relevance 0.46 · 2.5% (28 of 1,102 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.30 · 5.2% (57 of 1,102 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.29 · 6.6% (73 of 1,102 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (56 of 1,102 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.38 · 3.4% (37 of 1,102 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.27 · 8.2% (90 of 1,102 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.20 · 25.6% (282 of 1,102 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (106 of 1,102 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.38 · 3.0% (33 of 1,102 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.18 · 31.4% (346 of 1,102 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.17 · 32.2% (355 of 1,102 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (38 of 1,102 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (32 of 1,102 decks)
- Erode relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (31 of 1,102 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (28 of 1,102 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.11 · 54.5% (601 of 1,102 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (35 of 1,102 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.08 · 64.6% (712 of 1,102 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (31 of 1,102 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (29 of 1,102 decks)
All sorceries (38)
- Another Round relevance 0.66 · 7.2% (79 of 1,102 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (92 of 1,102 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.39 · 15.2% (167 of 1,102 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (98 of 1,102 decks)
- Daydream relevance 0.55 · 3.7% (41 of 1,102 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.40 · 9.3% (102 of 1,102 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.39 · 9.5% (105 of 1,102 decks)
- Storm Herd relevance 0.38 · 9.9% (109 of 1,102 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.47 · 4.2% (46 of 1,102 decks)
- Cleansing Nova relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (65 of 1,102 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.41 · 4.4% (48 of 1,102 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.29 · 14.9% (164 of 1,102 decks)
- Morningtide's Light relevance 0.46 · 3.5% (39 of 1,102 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (54 of 1,102 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.31 · 11.3% (124 of 1,102 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.25 · 25.8% (284 of 1,102 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.34 · 4.8% (53 of 1,102 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (48 of 1,102 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.24 · 23.1% (255 of 1,102 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.48 · 2.5% (27 of 1,102 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.30 · 5.4% (60 of 1,102 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (53 of 1,102 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.25 · 12.7% (140 of 1,102 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.21 · 23.9% (263 of 1,102 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (68 of 1,102 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.18 · 33.4% (368 of 1,102 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (104 of 1,102 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (55 of 1,102 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.20 · 25.4% (280 of 1,102 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (32 of 1,102 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.38 · 2.6% (29 of 1,102 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.15 · 34.2% (377 of 1,102 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (32 of 1,102 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (43 of 1,102 decks)
- Split Up relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (29 of 1,102 decks)
- Fumigate relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (33 of 1,102 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (44 of 1,102 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (76 of 1,102 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- The Eternal Wanderer relevance 0.52 · 5.4% (59 of 1,102 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (56 of 1,102 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (50 of 1,102 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.45 · 11.6% (128 of 1,102 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.34 · 23.4% (258 of 1,102 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.40 · 5.8% (64 of 1,102 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.33 · 11.8% (130 of 1,102 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.28 · 22.4% (247 of 1,102 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.37 · 5.5% (61 of 1,102 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.34 · 9.0% (99 of 1,102 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.41 · 4.3% (47 of 1,102 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.31 · 12.6% (139 of 1,102 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.26 · 23.0% (254 of 1,102 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (42 of 1,102 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.26 · 22.5% (248 of 1,102 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.26 · 23.0% (253 of 1,102 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.26 · 20.6% (227 of 1,102 decks)
- Bretagard Stronghold relevance 0.42 · 3.7% (41 of 1,102 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.31 · 9.6% (106 of 1,102 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.39 · 4.0% (44 of 1,102 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.26 · 17.2% (190 of 1,102 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.22 · 29.2% (322 of 1,102 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.24 · 19.9% (219 of 1,102 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.36 · 4.2% (46 of 1,102 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (43 of 1,102 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.22 · 25.0% (276 of 1,102 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (54 of 1,102 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.43 · 2.5% (28 of 1,102 decks)
- Blighted Steppe relevance 0.43 · 2.5% (28 of 1,102 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (77 of 1,102 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.37 · 3.4% (37 of 1,102 decks)
- Emeria, the Sky Ruin relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (38 of 1,102 decks)
- Idyllic Grange relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (30 of 1,102 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (78 of 1,102 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (85 of 1,102 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.39 · 2.7% (30 of 1,102 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (35 of 1,102 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (43 of 1,102 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.19 · 23.4% (258 of 1,102 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.36 · 2.5% (28 of 1,102 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (44 of 1,102 decks)
- Kabira Takedown // Kabira Plateau relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (27 of 1,102 decks)
- Razorgrass Ambush // Razorgrass Field relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (28 of 1,102 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (37 of 1,102 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (31 of 1,102 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (28 of 1,102 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (31 of 1,102 decks)
- Castle Ardenvale relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (40 of 1,102 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (37 of 1,102 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (37 of 1,102 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (48 of 1,102 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 7.9% (87 of 1,102 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (35 of 1,102 decks)
All lands (50)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.39 · 9.8% (108 of 1,102 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.38 · 8.6% (95 of 1,102 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.36 · 11.3% (124 of 1,102 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.37 · 10.1% (111 of 1,102 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.37 · 9.3% (102 of 1,102 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.37 · 8.8% (97 of 1,102 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.36 · 9.3% (103 of 1,102 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.36 · 9.7% (107 of 1,102 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.36 · 9.3% (103 of 1,102 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.29 · 20.2% (223 of 1,102 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.30 · 18.6% (205 of 1,102 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.38 · 5.2% (57 of 1,102 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.37 · 6.2% (68 of 1,102 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (99 of 1,102 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.36 · 7.4% (82 of 1,102 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.37 · 5.2% (57 of 1,102 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.31 · 12.3% (135 of 1,102 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.32 · 11.1% (122 of 1,102 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.38 · 4.7% (52 of 1,102 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.30 · 12.1% (133 of 1,102 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.24 · 25.8% (284 of 1,102 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (58 of 1,102 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (45 of 1,102 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.36 · 4.3% (47 of 1,102 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (55 of 1,102 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 31.0% (342 of 1,102 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (42 of 1,102 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.23 · 19.4% (214 of 1,102 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.20 · 35.2% (388 of 1,102 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.28 · 8.7% (96 of 1,102 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.23 · 15.2% (167 of 1,102 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (56 of 1,102 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.20 · 28.5% (314 of 1,102 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.23 · 12.4% (137 of 1,102 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.21 · 16.7% (184 of 1,102 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.16 · 40.3% (444 of 1,102 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.16 · 43.1% (475 of 1,102 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (48 of 1,102 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.13 · 56.7% (625 of 1,102 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.17 · 30.4% (335 of 1,102 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.15 · 41.6% (458 of 1,102 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (32 of 1,102 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.14 · 34.6% (381 of 1,102 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (35 of 1,102 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (27 of 1,102 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.10 · 54.1% (596 of 1,102 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.08 · 59.1% (651 of 1,102 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 79.3% (874 of 1,102 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.02 · 90.2% (994 of 1,102 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 89.9% (991 of 1,102 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Emiel the Blessed, from 1,102 real Commander decks.