Cards like Mizzix's Mastery
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other five-color decks
Cards like Growth Spiral
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other five-color decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 50%
- Eureka Moment 36%
- Joint Exploration 2%
Cards like Circuitous Route
14× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other five-color decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other five-color decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.7× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other five-color decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 26% of other five-color decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Cultivate 34%
- Rampant Growth 30%
- Reshape the Earth 22%
- Kodama's Reach 21%
- Shared Roots 7%
- Explosive Vegetation 6%
- Migration Path 6%
- Search for Tomorrow 5%
- Slimefoot's Survey 3%
- Verdant Mastery 2%
- Map the Frontier 2%
- Grow from the Ashes 2%
- Boundless Realms 2%
- Terramorph 1%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 1%
- Far Wanderings 1%
- Spring // Mind 1%
Other options: Reach the Horizon, Beneath the Sands, Untamed Wilds, New Generation's Technique, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Nissa's Expedition, Roamer's Routine, Path to the Festival, Traverse the Outlands, Peregrination, Deep Reconnaissance, Map the Wastes, Celebrate the Harvest, Harvest Season
Cards like Solve the Equation
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other five-color decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other five-color decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Dark Ritual
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other five-color decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Dark Ritual 33%
- Seething Song 10%
- Pyretic Ritual 10%
- Desperate Ritual 7%
Cards like Galvanic Iteration
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Galvanic Iteration 18%
- Teach by Example 13%
- Doublecast 4%
- Complete the Circuit 4%
- Repeated Reverberation 4%
- Dual Strike 4%
- Twinferno 1%
Other options: Howl of the Horde, Storm King's Thunder
Cards like Shore Up
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Shore Up 22%
- Magic Damper 13%
- Octopus Form 6%
Other options: Mizzium Skin, Dive Down, Glint, You See a Guard Approach, Shell Shield, Chase Inspiration
Cards like Urban Evolution
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other five-color decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Rise from the Tides
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other five-color decks
Cards
Other options: Reap the Seagraf, Moan of the Unhallowed
Cards like Training Grounds
6.4× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other five-color decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other five-color decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Brainstorm
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other five-color decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 45%
- Brainsurge 11%
Cards like Beast Within
3.3× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other five-color decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other five-color decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Beast Within 17%
- Generous Gift 10%
Cards like Opt
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Cards like Noxious Revival
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other five-color decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other five-color decks
Cards like Preordain
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other five-color decks
Cards
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany
Cards like Clone Legion
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Cerulean Wisps
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Cerulean Wisps 19%
- Refocus 4%
Cards like Dig Through Time
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other five-color decks
Cards like Sylvan Scrying
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other five-color decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Sylvan Scrying 16%
- Reclaim the Wastes 3%
- Dig Up 2%
Other options: Thirsting Roots, Lay of the Land, Attune with Aether, Fork in the Road, Seek the Horizon, Scouting Trek, Rites of Spring
Cards like Counterspell
1.4× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other five-color decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other five-color decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Counterspell 20%
- Negate 12%
- Dovin's Veto 4%
Other options: Spell Snare, Essence Scatter, Remove Soul, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Duneblast
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Duneblast 21%
- Divine Reckoning 3%
Cards like Crop Rotation
18× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other five-color decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Crop Rotation 21%
- Reap and Sow 3%
Cards like Call Forth the Tempest
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
4.7× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other five-color decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other five-color decks
All top picks (50)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.44 · 36.4% (75 of 206 decks)
- Profane Tutor relevance 0.40 · 42.7% (88 of 206 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 0.39 · 41.7% (86 of 206 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.44 · 28.2% (58 of 206 decks)
- Mizzix's Mastery relevance 0.34 · 51.9% (107 of 206 decks)
- Increasing Vengeance relevance 0.42 · 31.1% (64 of 206 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.45 · 21.8% (45 of 206 decks)
- Rise from the Tides relevance 0.46 · 19.9% (41 of 206 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.44 · 21.4% (44 of 206 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.41 · 27.2% (56 of 206 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.43 · 21.8% (45 of 206 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.38 · 31.6% (65 of 206 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.44 · 18.0% (37 of 206 decks)
- Creative Technique relevance 0.45 · 14.6% (30 of 206 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.39 · 27.2% (56 of 206 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 0.44 · 16.5% (34 of 206 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.42 · 19.4% (40 of 206 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.32 · 45.1% (93 of 206 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.43 · 15.5% (32 of 206 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.37 · 31.1% (64 of 206 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.43 · 16.0% (33 of 206 decks)
- Army of the Damned relevance 0.43 · 17.0% (35 of 206 decks)
- Claim the Firstborn relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (26 of 206 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.42 · 18.0% (37 of 206 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.38 · 27.2% (56 of 206 decks)
- Fractured Identity relevance 0.41 · 19.9% (41 of 206 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.41 · 18.0% (37 of 206 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.44 · 12.6% (26 of 206 decks)
- Wake the Dragon relevance 0.44 · 13.1% (27 of 206 decks)
- Rise of the Dark Realms relevance 0.41 · 17.0% (35 of 206 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.39 · 22.3% (46 of 206 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.40 · 19.4% (40 of 206 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.43 · 13.6% (28 of 206 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.34 · 35.4% (73 of 206 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.41 · 15.5% (32 of 206 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (22 of 206 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.38 · 21.8% (45 of 206 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.41 · 15.0% (31 of 206 decks)
- Breach the Multiverse relevance 0.42 · 14.1% (29 of 206 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.34 · 31.6% (65 of 206 decks)
- Disorienting Choice relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (22 of 206 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.37 · 23.3% (48 of 206 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.38 · 19.9% (41 of 206 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.42 · 13.1% (27 of 206 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 0.43 · 11.7% (24 of 206 decks)
- Teach by Example relevance 0.41 · 13.1% (27 of 206 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.34 · 29.1% (60 of 206 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.40 · 14.1% (29 of 206 decks)
- Experimental Overload relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (19 of 206 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.42 · 11.7% (24 of 206 decks)
All creatures (32)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 0.43 · 11.7% (24 of 206 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.34 · 13.6% (28 of 206 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 0.38 · 8.7% (18 of 206 decks)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 0.33 · 12.1% (25 of 206 decks)
- Zirda, the Dawnwaker relevance 0.37 · 4.9% (10 of 206 decks)
- Ovika, Enigma Goliath relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (11 of 206 decks)
- Voltaic Construct relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (8 of 206 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (13 of 206 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.24 · 10.2% (21 of 206 decks)
- Velomachus Lorehold relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (10 of 206 decks)
- Tinder Wall relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (8 of 206 decks)
- Prismari, the Inspiration relevance 0.21 · 12.6% (26 of 206 decks)
- Lorehold, the Historian relevance 0.22 · 7.8% (16 of 206 decks)
- Rune-Scarred Demon relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (6 of 206 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Silverquill, the Disputant relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (11 of 206 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Parun relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Witherbloom Apprentice relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (8 of 206 decks)
- Beledros Witherbloom relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.15 · 6.8% (14 of 206 decks)
- Witherbloom, the Balancer relevance 0.17 · 3.9% (8 of 206 decks)
- Ignoble Hierarch relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Hexing Squelcher relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (13 of 206 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (13 of 206 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
All artifacts (21)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.31 · 4.4% (9 of 206 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.28 · 5.8% (12 of 206 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (14 of 206 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (6 of 206 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.25 · 5.8% (12 of 206 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (14 of 206 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (8 of 206 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Resonating Lute relevance 0.21 · 8.7% (18 of 206 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.23 · 4.4% (9 of 206 decks)
- Talisman of Creativity relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Diary of Dreams relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.14 · 7.3% (15 of 206 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.12 · 11.7% (24 of 206 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.08 · 38.3% (79 of 206 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 20.4% (42 of 206 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (11)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.43 · 16.0% (33 of 206 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (13 of 206 decks)
- Thousand-Year Storm relevance 0.23 · 9.7% (20 of 206 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (10 of 206 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (6 of 206 decks)
- Jeskai Ascendancy relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (9 of 206 decks)
- Leyline of the Guildpact relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (11 of 206 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (6 of 206 decks)
All instants (50)
- Increasing Vengeance relevance 0.42 · 31.1% (64 of 206 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.45 · 21.8% (45 of 206 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.44 · 21.4% (44 of 206 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.43 · 21.8% (45 of 206 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.32 · 45.1% (93 of 206 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.42 · 18.0% (37 of 206 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.44 · 12.6% (26 of 206 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.40 · 19.4% (40 of 206 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (22 of 206 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.38 · 19.9% (41 of 206 decks)
- Teach by Example relevance 0.41 · 13.1% (27 of 206 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.34 · 29.1% (60 of 206 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.40 · 14.1% (29 of 206 decks)
- Artifact Mutation relevance 0.41 · 13.1% (27 of 206 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.43 · 10.7% (22 of 206 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.31 · 35.9% (74 of 206 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.43 · 8.7% (18 of 206 decks)
- Galvanic Iteration relevance 0.37 · 18.0% (37 of 206 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.36 · 18.4% (38 of 206 decks)
- Wild Ricochet relevance 0.44 · 7.3% (15 of 206 decks)
- Dream's Grip relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (16 of 206 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.35 · 20.9% (43 of 206 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.37 · 14.1% (29 of 206 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.30 · 33.5% (69 of 206 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.42 · 8.3% (17 of 206 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.40 · 9.7% (20 of 206 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.34 · 18.0% (37 of 206 decks)
- Reiterate relevance 0.41 · 8.3% (17 of 206 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.34 · 17.5% (36 of 206 decks)
- Twiddle relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (13 of 206 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.36 · 13.6% (28 of 206 decks)
- Practical Research relevance 0.39 · 8.7% (18 of 206 decks)
- Aura Mutation relevance 0.41 · 6.8% (14 of 206 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (15 of 206 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.35 · 13.1% (27 of 206 decks)
- Turn the Earth relevance 0.42 · 5.8% (12 of 206 decks)
- Djeru's Resolve relevance 0.42 · 5.8% (12 of 206 decks)
- Sacrifice relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (14 of 206 decks)
- Pyretic Ritual relevance 0.37 · 10.2% (21 of 206 decks)
- Reverberate relevance 0.39 · 8.3% (17 of 206 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.41 · 5.8% (12 of 206 decks)
- Divergent Transformations relevance 0.42 · 4.9% (10 of 206 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.37 · 10.2% (21 of 206 decks)
- Angel's Grace relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (16 of 206 decks)
- Memory's Journey relevance 0.40 · 5.3% (11 of 206 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.30 · 21.4% (44 of 206 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.39 · 6.3% (13 of 206 decks)
- Seething Song relevance 0.35 · 10.2% (21 of 206 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.39 · 6.3% (13 of 206 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.34 · 12.1% (25 of 206 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.44 · 36.4% (75 of 206 decks)
- Profane Tutor relevance 0.40 · 42.7% (88 of 206 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 0.39 · 41.7% (86 of 206 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.44 · 28.2% (58 of 206 decks)
- Mizzix's Mastery relevance 0.34 · 51.9% (107 of 206 decks)
- Rise from the Tides relevance 0.46 · 19.9% (41 of 206 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.41 · 27.2% (56 of 206 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.38 · 31.6% (65 of 206 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.44 · 18.0% (37 of 206 decks)
- Creative Technique relevance 0.45 · 14.6% (30 of 206 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.39 · 27.2% (56 of 206 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 0.44 · 16.5% (34 of 206 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.42 · 19.4% (40 of 206 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.43 · 15.5% (32 of 206 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.37 · 31.1% (64 of 206 decks)
- Army of the Damned relevance 0.43 · 17.0% (35 of 206 decks)
- Claim the Firstborn relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (26 of 206 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.38 · 27.2% (56 of 206 decks)
- Fractured Identity relevance 0.41 · 19.9% (41 of 206 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.41 · 18.0% (37 of 206 decks)
- Wake the Dragon relevance 0.44 · 13.1% (27 of 206 decks)
- Rise of the Dark Realms relevance 0.41 · 17.0% (35 of 206 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.39 · 22.3% (46 of 206 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.43 · 13.6% (28 of 206 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.34 · 35.4% (73 of 206 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.41 · 15.5% (32 of 206 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.38 · 21.8% (45 of 206 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.41 · 15.0% (31 of 206 decks)
- Breach the Multiverse relevance 0.42 · 14.1% (29 of 206 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.34 · 31.6% (65 of 206 decks)
- Disorienting Choice relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (22 of 206 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.37 · 23.3% (48 of 206 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.42 · 13.1% (27 of 206 decks)
- Experimental Overload relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (19 of 206 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.42 · 11.7% (24 of 206 decks)
- Duneblast relevance 0.36 · 21.4% (44 of 206 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.41 · 12.1% (25 of 206 decks)
- Genesis Storm relevance 0.45 · 8.7% (18 of 206 decks)
- Rebuild the City relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (20 of 206 decks)
- Call Forth the Tempest relevance 0.38 · 16.0% (33 of 206 decks)
- Insurrection relevance 0.42 · 10.7% (22 of 206 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.37 · 17.5% (36 of 206 decks)
- Elemental Eruption relevance 0.43 · 8.7% (18 of 206 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.38 · 15.0% (31 of 206 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.40 · 11.7% (24 of 206 decks)
- Storm Herd relevance 0.41 · 10.7% (22 of 206 decks)
- Grapeshot relevance 0.39 · 12.1% (25 of 206 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.37 · 15.5% (32 of 206 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.42 · 8.7% (18 of 206 decks)
- Bring to Light relevance 0.26 · 47.6% (98 of 206 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (1)
- Professor Onyx relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Maze's End relevance 0.36 · 28.2% (58 of 206 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.41 · 15.0% (31 of 206 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.41 · 13.1% (27 of 206 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.36 · 20.9% (43 of 206 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.39 · 14.6% (30 of 206 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.40 · 13.1% (27 of 206 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.36 · 18.9% (39 of 206 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.38 · 11.2% (23 of 206 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 0.38 · 8.3% (17 of 206 decks)
- Great Hall of the Biblioplex relevance 0.31 · 17.5% (36 of 206 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.37 · 7.8% (16 of 206 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (15 of 206 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (14 of 206 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.34 · 9.7% (20 of 206 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.37 · 5.8% (12 of 206 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (13 of 206 decks)
- The Biblioplex relevance 0.37 · 4.4% (9 of 206 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (13 of 206 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.30 · 10.7% (22 of 206 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.34 · 5.8% (12 of 206 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.32 · 7.3% (15 of 206 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.27 · 12.6% (26 of 206 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.21 · 29.6% (61 of 206 decks)
- Indatha Triome relevance 0.24 · 13.6% (28 of 206 decks)
- Zagoth Triome relevance 0.23 · 18.4% (38 of 206 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (11 of 206 decks)
- Raugrin Triome relevance 0.23 · 15.0% (31 of 206 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (15 of 206 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (11 of 206 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.29 · 4.9% (10 of 206 decks)
- Jetmir's Garden relevance 0.23 · 13.1% (27 of 206 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (14 of 206 decks)
- Ketria Triome relevance 0.20 · 22.3% (46 of 206 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (8 of 206 decks)
- The World Tree relevance 0.20 · 24.3% (50 of 206 decks)
- Ziatora's Proving Ground relevance 0.23 · 12.1% (25 of 206 decks)
- Lindblum, Industrial Regency // Mage Siege relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (9 of 206 decks)
- Xander's Lounge relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (21 of 206 decks)
- Savai Triome relevance 0.24 · 8.7% (18 of 206 decks)
- Raffine's Tower relevance 0.24 · 8.3% (17 of 206 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.21 · 13.1% (27 of 206 decks)
- Kher Keep relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Emeria's Call // Emeria, Shattered Skyclave relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (5 of 206 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.16 · 15.5% (32 of 206 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.26 · 2.9% (6 of 206 decks)
All lands (50)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.36 · 27.7% (57 of 206 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.36 · 25.7% (53 of 206 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.35 · 27.7% (57 of 206 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.36 · 24.8% (51 of 206 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.35 · 26.7% (55 of 206 decks)
- Boros Guildgate relevance 0.36 · 25.2% (52 of 206 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.36 · 23.8% (49 of 206 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.35 · 26.2% (54 of 206 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.35 · 25.7% (53 of 206 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.35 · 25.7% (53 of 206 decks)
- Rakdos Guildgate relevance 0.36 · 24.3% (50 of 206 decks)
- Black Dragon Gate relevance 0.36 · 22.8% (47 of 206 decks)
- Orzhov Guildgate relevance 0.36 · 23.8% (49 of 206 decks)
- Citadel Gate relevance 0.36 · 22.8% (47 of 206 decks)
- Cliffgate relevance 0.36 · 22.8% (47 of 206 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.35 · 25.2% (52 of 206 decks)
- Azorius Guildgate relevance 0.35 · 23.8% (49 of 206 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.40 · 13.6% (28 of 206 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.35 · 16.5% (34 of 206 decks)
- Plaza of Harmony relevance 0.38 · 11.7% (24 of 206 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.41 · 4.4% (9 of 206 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.36 · 7.8% (16 of 206 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (10 of 206 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (10 of 206 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.34 · 4.9% (10 of 206 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.28 · 12.1% (25 of 206 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.32 · 6.3% (13 of 206 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.34 · 4.4% (9 of 206 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.28 · 9.2% (19 of 206 decks)
- Llanowar Wastes relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (14 of 206 decks)
- Sulfurous Springs relevance 0.30 · 5.8% (12 of 206 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.28 · 8.3% (17 of 206 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.25 · 13.6% (28 of 206 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (14 of 206 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.33 · 3.9% (8 of 206 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.23 · 14.6% (30 of 206 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.27 · 8.7% (18 of 206 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.27 · 8.7% (18 of 206 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.32 · 3.9% (8 of 206 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (14 of 206 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Mystic Monastery relevance 0.24 · 12.1% (25 of 206 decks)
- Caves of Koilos relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (11 of 206 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.26 · 7.3% (15 of 206 decks)
- Battlefield Forge relevance 0.27 · 5.8% (12 of 206 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (10 of 206 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (11 of 206 decks)
- Shivan Reef relevance 0.26 · 7.8% (16 of 206 decks)
- Riverglide Pathway // Lavaglide Pathway relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Codie, Vociferous Codex, from 206 real Commander decks.