Cards like Pond Prophet
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
70% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
2.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pond Prophet 79%
- Elvish Visionary 60%
- Llanowar Visionary 49%
- Owlbear 16%
- Generous Stray 7%
- Joraga Visionary 5%
- Merchant of Secrets 5%
- Nimble Innovator 2%
- Kavu Climber 2%
Other options: Wistful Selkie, Pyknite, Striped Bears, Shaman of Spring, Rogue Refiner, Carven Caryatid, Arctic Wolves, Multani's Acolyte, Rhox Oracle, Jungle Barrier, Wall of Blossoms, Council of Advisors
Cards like Man-o'-War
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Man-o'-War 44%
- Aether Adept 26%
- Winter Eladrin 23%
- Bigfin Bouncer 12%
- Mist Raven 9%
- Iceridge Serpent 9%
- Air-Cult Elemental 5%
- Roaming Ghostlight 2%
Other options: Spellweaver Duo, Hotshot Investigators, Riddlemaster Sphinx, Angler Drake, Voidwielder, Hoverguard Sweepers, Matterbending Mage, Rimekin Recluse, Surrakar Banisher, Peerless Ropemaster, Separatist Voidmage, Disruptor of Currents, Exclusion Mage
Cards like Peregrine Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Wild Growth
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
2.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Wild Growth 42%
- Fertile Ground 35%
- Overgrowth 33%
- Market Festival 28%
- Dawn's Reflection 26%
- Verdant Haven 21%
- Blighted Burgeoning 21%
- Glittering Frost 12%
Other options: Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth
Cards like Drix Fatemaker
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Drix Fatemaker 37%
- Duskshell Crawler 30%
- Pridemalkin 21%
- Gnarlid Colony 16%
- Tuskguard Captain 9%
- Crowned Ceratok 5%
Other options: Baloth Pup, Trollbred Guardian, Hornbash Mentor
Cards like Sunshower Druid
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Sunshower Druid 35%
- Pollenbright Druid 35%
- Dauntless Survivor 12%
- Timberland Guide 5%
- Guardian Gladewalker 2%
- Satyr Grovedancer 2%
- Twisted Spider-Clone 2%
- Bond Beetle 2%
- Kujar Seedsculptor 2%
Other options: Ridgescale Tusker, Merfolk Skydiver, Ironshell Beetle
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Planar Incision
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Planar Incision 28%
- Teferi's Time Twist 19%
- Essence Flux 16%
- Spaceshift 2%
Cards like Cloudkin Seer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards like Avenging Hunter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Avenging Hunter 23%
- Aarakocra Sneak 21%
Cards like Bloom Hulk
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Bloom Hulk 21%
- Gitaxian Anatomist 14%
- Kiora's Dambreaker 12%
Cards like Archaeomancer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Archaeomancer 47%
- Mnemonic Wall 16%
- Shipwreck Dowser 7%
Other options: Scholar of the Ages, Scrivener, Salvager of Secrets
Cards like Myconid Spore Tender
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Reclamation Sage, Acidic Slime, Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Foundation Breaker, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Farhaven Elf
19× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Farhaven Elf 44%
- Wild Wanderer 12%
- Ondu Giant 7%
- Yavimaya Granger 2%
Other options: Primeval Herald, Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru, Simulacrum Shaper, Quirion Trailblazer, Topiary Stomper
Cards like Gift of Paradise
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Bellowing Crier
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Owl Familiar, Vodalian Merchant, Elite Instructor, Bazaar Trademage, Merfolk Traders, Sky-Eel School, Screeching Drake
Cards like Elvish Rejuvenator
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Floriferous Vinewall, Overgrown Pest
Cards like Faerie Seer
8.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Faerie Seer 19%
- Augury Owl 12%
- Silver Raven 2%
Other options: Chrome Cat, Grey Havens Navigator, Horizon Scholar, Bronze Walrus, Omenspeaker, Sage's Row Savant, Thaumaturge's Familiar, Galadhrim Guide, Octoprophet, Cloudreader Sphinx, Archive Dragon, Prophet of the Peak, Automatic Librarian, Willow-Wind
Cards like Shore Up
8.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Shore Up 19%
- Dive Down 9%
- Magic Damper 7%
- Mizzium Skin 5%
- Octopus Form 5%
- Chase Inspiration 2%
Other options: Glint, You See a Guard Approach, Shell Shield
Cards like Prosperous Pirates
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Professional Wrestler, Long-Bodied Grey Dog, Sailor of Means
Cards like Run Away Together
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Return to Nature
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Wood Elves
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Sea Gate Oracle
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Mechanozoa
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mechanozoa 23%
- Gilded Scuttler 9%
Other options: Waylaying Pirates, Utrom Scientists, Collector's Case, Alchemax Slayer-Bots, Lodestone Needle // Guidestone Compass
Cards like Mulldrifter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards like Arboreal Grazer
16× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Pestermite
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pestermite 21%
- Glamermite 2%
Other options: Giant-Sized Flying Ant, Deceiver Exarch, Divining Duelist
All top picks (50)
- Serum Visionary relevance 0.48 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 0.48 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Pond Prophet relevance 0.31 · 79.1% (34 of 43 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 0.49 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.38 · 48.8% (21 of 43 decks)
- Myconid Spore Tender relevance 0.48 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Conclave Naturalists relevance 0.48 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Maul Splicer relevance 0.47 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Boulderbranch Golem relevance 0.46 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.32 · 60.5% (26 of 43 decks)
- Aether Adept relevance 0.45 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Pondering Mage relevance 0.48 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.28 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Winter Eladrin relevance 0.44 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Wildwood Escort relevance 0.47 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.29 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.34 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Drix Fatemaker relevance 0.37 · 37.2% (16 of 43 decks)
- Rishadan Cutpurse relevance 0.46 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Avenging Hunter relevance 0.42 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Aarakocra Sneak relevance 0.42 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.33 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Apothecary Stomper relevance 0.41 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Market Festival relevance 0.38 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.32 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Prosperous Pirates relevance 0.43 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.36 · 34.9% (15 of 43 decks)
- Tome Raider relevance 0.41 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Mechanozoa relevance 0.38 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Trade Route Envoy relevance 0.40 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Bloom Hulk relevance 0.38 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Dawn's Reflection relevance 0.37 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Biomathematician relevance 0.34 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.34 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Blighted Burgeoning relevance 0.37 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Adaptive Sporesinger relevance 0.37 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Whirlpool Rider relevance 0.36 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Dusyut Earthcarver relevance 0.39 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Pestermite relevance 0.36 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.21 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Verdant Haven relevance 0.35 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 0.36 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Treeguard Duo relevance 0.30 · 34.9% (15 of 43 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.30 · 34.9% (15 of 43 decks)
- Enlightened Maniac relevance 0.41 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.34 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Dauntless Survivor relevance 0.37 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Badgermole relevance 0.32 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Gitaxian Anatomist relevance 0.35 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Jeering Homunculus relevance 0.37 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Serum Visionary relevance 0.48 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 0.48 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Pond Prophet relevance 0.31 · 79.1% (34 of 43 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 0.49 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.38 · 48.8% (21 of 43 decks)
- Myconid Spore Tender relevance 0.48 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Conclave Naturalists relevance 0.48 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Maul Splicer relevance 0.47 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Boulderbranch Golem relevance 0.46 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.32 · 60.5% (26 of 43 decks)
- Aether Adept relevance 0.45 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Pondering Mage relevance 0.48 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.28 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Winter Eladrin relevance 0.44 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Wildwood Escort relevance 0.47 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.29 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.34 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Drix Fatemaker relevance 0.37 · 37.2% (16 of 43 decks)
- Rishadan Cutpurse relevance 0.46 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Avenging Hunter relevance 0.42 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Aarakocra Sneak relevance 0.42 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.33 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Apothecary Stomper relevance 0.41 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.32 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Prosperous Pirates relevance 0.43 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.36 · 34.9% (15 of 43 decks)
- Tome Raider relevance 0.41 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Mechanozoa relevance 0.38 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Trade Route Envoy relevance 0.40 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Bloom Hulk relevance 0.38 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Biomathematician relevance 0.34 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Adaptive Sporesinger relevance 0.37 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Whirlpool Rider relevance 0.36 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Dusyut Earthcarver relevance 0.39 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Pestermite relevance 0.36 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.21 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 0.36 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Treeguard Duo relevance 0.30 · 34.9% (15 of 43 decks)
- Enlightened Maniac relevance 0.41 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.34 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Dauntless Survivor relevance 0.37 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Badgermole relevance 0.32 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Gitaxian Anatomist relevance 0.35 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Jeering Homunculus relevance 0.37 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.26 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Frost Lynx relevance 0.36 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Owlbear relevance 0.33 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.25 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 0.33 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Nurturing Bristleback relevance 0.34 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
All artifacts (39)
- Hulldrifter relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Pinnacle Kill-Ship relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Neurok Stealthsuit relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Fleetfeather Sandals relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Cloak of the Bat relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Blitzball relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Glimmerlight relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Spare Supplies relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.12 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Bramble Armor relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Leather Armor relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Lifespark Spellbomb relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Nutrient Block relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Honored Heirloom relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Bumbleflower's Sharepot relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Bonder's Ornament relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Manalith relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.10 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Magnifying Glass relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Golden Argosy relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Lembas relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Simic Locket relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.07 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.06 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.05 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.06 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.06 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.05 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.03 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.00 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Market Festival relevance 0.38 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Dawn's Reflection relevance 0.37 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.34 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Blighted Burgeoning relevance 0.37 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Verdant Haven relevance 0.35 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.30 · 34.9% (15 of 43 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.30 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Grafted Growth relevance 0.31 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Glittering Frost relevance 0.28 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.21 · 37.2% (16 of 43 decks)
- Sheltered Aerie relevance 0.29 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.19 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.24 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Protective Bubble relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Stop Cold relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Flood the Engine relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Nature's Embrace relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.20 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Robe of Mirrors relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Find the Path relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Alexi's Cloak relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Vanishing relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Stasis Field relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Diplomatic Immunity relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Blossombind relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Teferi's Curse relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Numbing Dose relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Vineweft relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.14 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.13 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Psychic Venom relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.13 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Ice Cage relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Tall as a Beanstalk relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Savage Silhouette relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Feral Invocation relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.12 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Kasmina's Transmutation relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Zephyr Charge relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Regeneration relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Broken Fall relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Silken Strength relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Curse of the Bloody Tome relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Flight of Fancy relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Hermetic Study relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
All instants (50)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.27 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.26 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.22 · 34.9% (15 of 43 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.25 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.23 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.21 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.22 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.21 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Polliwallop relevance 0.21 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.20 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Gift relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.20 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.19 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.19 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.20 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.20 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Intervene relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Aether Spike relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.18 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Remove Soul relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.15 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.16 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.17 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Burrog Barrage relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.17 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.17 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Mizzium Skin relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.13 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.14 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.14 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Peel from Reality relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.14 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.22 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Mind Spiral relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.18 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Commune with Beavers relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Vivisurgeon's Insight relevance 0.20 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Pearl of Wisdom relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Brave the Wilds relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Relentless Advance relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.15 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.14 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Track Down relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.13 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Over the Edge relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Benefaction of Rhonas relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Shoot Down relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Relentless Pursuit relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Treason of Isengard relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.12 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Aggressive Instinct relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Stall Out relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Seek the Wilds relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Amass the Components relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Deconstruct relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Assert Perfection relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Jailbreak Scheme relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Commune with the Gods relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Soul's Might relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Commune with Nature relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Adventure Awaits relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.11 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Secrets of the Golden City relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Ancestral Reminiscence relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- You Find a Cursed Idol relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Shattered Wings relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.10 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
All utility lands (36)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.20 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.18 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.18 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.17 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.14 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.17 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.16 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.14 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.14 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.15 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.12 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.10 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.10 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.11 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Tocasia's Dig Site relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Soaring Seacliff relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.07 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Oakhollow Village relevance 0.07 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Lilypad Village relevance 0.07 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.03 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.03 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.02 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
All lands (39)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.20 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.15 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.18 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.19 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.15 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.14 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.16 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.15 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.14 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Timberland Ruins relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.10 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.10 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Seafloor Debris relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.11 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.11 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.07 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Public Thoroughfare relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Rupture Spire relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Skyshroud Forest relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Unknown Shores relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Uncharted Haven relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.07 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.02 · 58.1% (25 of 43 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.03 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 81.4% (35 of 43 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 81.4% (35 of 43 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.02 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.01 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.01 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.01 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lilysplash Mentor, from 43 real Commander decks.