Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Donatello, Turtle Techie relevance 0.62 · 33.8% (50 of 148 decks)
- Bespoke Bō relevance 0.59 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Utrom Scientists relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Buzz Bots relevance 0.54 · 33.1% (49 of 148 decks)
- Omni-Cheese Pizza relevance 0.57 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Turtle Van relevance 0.57 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Donatello, Mutant Mechanic relevance 0.51 · 27.0% (40 of 148 decks)
- Ooze Spill relevance 0.52 · 25.7% (38 of 148 decks)
- Mind Transfer Protocol relevance 0.53 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Fugitive Droid relevance 0.45 · 37.2% (55 of 148 decks)
- Utrom Monitor relevance 0.56 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Donatello, Gadget Master relevance 0.46 · 31.1% (46 of 148 decks)
- Return to the Sewers relevance 0.53 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Henchbots relevance 0.53 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Donatello, the Brains relevance 0.48 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Chrome Dome relevance 0.44 · 27.7% (41 of 148 decks)
- Skateboard relevance 0.46 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.44 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Retro-Mutation relevance 0.47 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Krang, Master Mind relevance 0.41 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Turtle Blimp relevance 0.52 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.42 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Stockman, Mad Fly-entist relevance 0.49 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Illvoi Light Jammer relevance 0.43 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.36 · 33.8% (50 of 148 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Man Ray relevance 0.46 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 0.42 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Roadkill Rodney relevance 0.46 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Crustacean Commando relevance 0.46 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- April O'Neil, Human Element relevance 0.40 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Glimmerlight relevance 0.47 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Spider-Bot relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.35 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Big Mother Mouser relevance 0.39 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.40 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Donatello's Science Lesson relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.38 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Spider-Suit relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Mechan Assembler relevance 0.38 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Hot Dog Cart relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Technodrome relevance 0.39 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Donatello, Rad Scientist relevance 0.43 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.41 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.35 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Virulent Silencer relevance 0.38 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Rook Turret relevance 0.37 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.38 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade relevance 0.34 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.36 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.35 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
Card Stacks
17
Card Stacks
17Showing 1-2 of 17
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
49% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 53%
- Foundry Inspector 45%
- Cloud Key 20%
- Helm of Awakening 7%
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
5.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Negate
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other blue decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 33% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other blue decks
Cards
- Negate 57%
- Counterspell 49%
- Essence Scatter 13%
- Wild Unraveling 5%
- Disruption Protocol 4%
- Spell Snare 3%
Other options: Remove Soul, Minor Misstep, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Wash Away, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 42%
- Lightning Greaves 33%
Cards like Mystic Forge
4.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 62%
- Commander's Sphere 16%
Cards like Omni-Cheese Pizza
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Omni-Cheese Pizza 20%
- Instant Ramen 5%
- Nutrient Block 4%
- Lembas 4%
- Golden Egg 1%
Cards like Steel Overseer
7.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Nettlecyst
6.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Nettlecyst 25%
- Adaptive Omnitool 15%
Cards like Utrom Scientists
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Lodestone Needle // Guidestone Compass, Waylaying Pirates, Alchemax Slayer-Bots
Cards like Chrome Dome
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Chrome Dome 28%
- Cogwork Assembler 3%
Cards like Sewer-veillance Cam
6.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Ornithopter
7.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Ornithopter 20%
- Utrom Monitor 15%
- Somber Hoverguard 1%
- Memory Guardian 1%
Other options: Hovermyr, Chardalyn Dragon, Lumengrid Gargoyle, Scion of Ugin, Dancing Scimitar, Snare Thopter, A.I.M. Bot, Gold-Forged Sentinel, Qumulox, Anvilwrought Raptor, Millennial Gargoyle
Cards like The Reality Chip
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards like Fugitive Droid
9.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Buzz Bots
5.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Summit Sentinel, Exultant Cultist, Youthful Scholar, Merfolk Seer, Kingfisher, Surveilling Sprite, Messenger Drake, Runed Servitor, Aven Fisher, Phantasmal Shieldback, Salvage Drone, Ithilien Kingfisher, Jeskai Sage, Murder of Crows, Living Lies of Loki, Runewing, Darkslick Drake, Palace Familiar, Purple-Crystal Crab, Oculus, Trove Tracker
Cards like Mind Stone
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mind Stone 39%
- Chromatic Sphere 3%
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Donatello, Turtle Techie relevance 0.62 · 33.8% (50 of 148 decks)
- Utrom Scientists relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Buzz Bots relevance 0.54 · 33.1% (49 of 148 decks)
- Donatello, Mutant Mechanic relevance 0.51 · 27.0% (40 of 148 decks)
- Fugitive Droid relevance 0.45 · 37.2% (55 of 148 decks)
- Utrom Monitor relevance 0.56 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Donatello, Gadget Master relevance 0.46 · 31.1% (46 of 148 decks)
- Henchbots relevance 0.53 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Donatello, the Brains relevance 0.48 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Chrome Dome relevance 0.44 · 27.7% (41 of 148 decks)
- Krang, Master Mind relevance 0.41 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Stockman, Mad Fly-entist relevance 0.49 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Man Ray relevance 0.46 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Roadkill Rodney relevance 0.46 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Crustacean Commando relevance 0.46 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- April O'Neil, Human Element relevance 0.40 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Spider-Bot relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Big Mother Mouser relevance 0.39 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.40 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Mechan Assembler relevance 0.38 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Technodrome relevance 0.39 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Donatello, Rad Scientist relevance 0.43 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Virulent Silencer relevance 0.38 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Rook Turret relevance 0.37 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade relevance 0.34 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.28 · 31.8% (47 of 148 decks)
- Filigree Attendant relevance 0.35 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.26 · 39.2% (58 of 148 decks)
- Gearseeker Serpent relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.31 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Oaken Siren relevance 0.35 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.24 · 41.2% (61 of 148 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.24 · 39.9% (59 of 148 decks)
- The Mechanist, Aerial Artisan relevance 0.31 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.30 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.21 · 53.4% (79 of 148 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.22 · 44.6% (66 of 148 decks)
- April O'Neil, Live on the Scene relevance 0.40 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.35 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Workshop Assistant relevance 0.34 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Patchwork Automaton relevance 0.34 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.28 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.32 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Etherium Spinner relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.25 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Donnie & April, Adorkable Duo relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Artificer's Assistant relevance 0.28 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Automated Artificer relevance 0.34 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Mechanozoa relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.26 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Bespoke Bō relevance 0.59 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Omni-Cheese Pizza relevance 0.57 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Turtle Van relevance 0.57 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Skateboard relevance 0.46 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.44 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Turtle Blimp relevance 0.52 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Illvoi Light Jammer relevance 0.43 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.36 · 33.8% (50 of 148 decks)
- Glimmerlight relevance 0.47 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.35 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.38 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Spider-Suit relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Hot Dog Cart relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.41 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.35 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.38 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.36 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.35 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Manhole Cover relevance 0.41 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.33 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Fountainport Bell relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Coin of Mastery relevance 0.37 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.34 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.25 · 35.1% (52 of 148 decks)
- Sword of Sinew and Steel relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Retrofitter Foundry relevance 0.31 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Animation Module relevance 0.34 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.31 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.25 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- Golem Foundry relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.26 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Neurok Stealthsuit relevance 0.30 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Skyblinder Staff relevance 0.37 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.24 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.26 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Levitating Statue relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.31 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.25 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.29 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Interdimensional Web Watch relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.24 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.27 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Blitzball relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Retro-Mutation relevance 0.47 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.42 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Spider-Man No More relevance 0.37 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.27 · 28.4% (42 of 148 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.27 · 29.7% (44 of 148 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.28 · 23.6% (35 of 148 decks)
- Robotics Mastery relevance 0.38 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Containment Protocol relevance 0.40 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.34 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Cloak of Mists relevance 0.31 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.26 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Blossombind relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Ensoul Artifact relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- The Antiquities War relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.20 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Stuck in Summoner's Sanctum relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Case of the Filched Falcon relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.19 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Ringing Strike Mastery relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.16 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Cryoshatter relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Clan Crafter relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Underwater Tunnel // Slimy Aquarium relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Invisibility relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Zoetic Glyph relevance 0.25 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Stay Hidden, Stay Silent relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Meat Locker // Drowned Diner relevance 0.23 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Kumena's Awakening relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Bottomless Pool // Locker Room relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.11 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Watery Grasp relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.10 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- The Bath Song relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.10 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Ooze Spill relevance 0.52 · 25.7% (38 of 148 decks)
- Mind Transfer Protocol relevance 0.53 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Return to the Sewers relevance 0.53 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Donatello's Science Lesson relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Cerebral Download relevance 0.37 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.32 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Secret Identity relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Stern Dismissal relevance 0.33 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Deny the Divine relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.29 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.26 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Get Out relevance 0.29 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.26 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.25 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.25 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Revolutionary Rebuff relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.23 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.26 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.25 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Wild Unraveling relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Rescue relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Repulse relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.22 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.13 · 56.8% (84 of 148 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Desculpting Blast relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.22 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- It'll Quench Ya! relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Dazzling Denial relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.20 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.21 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Mindstatic relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Convolute relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Tune the Narrative relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Secrets of the Key relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.16 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.16 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Syphon Essence relevance 0.27 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
Sorceries
42
Sorceries
42 Showing 1-10 of 42
Page size
All sorceries (42)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 0.42 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Stealth Mission relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Pirate's Prize relevance 0.39 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.33 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Retrieve the Esper relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.24 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Here Comes a New Hero! relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.28 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.27 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.17 · 29.1% (43 of 148 decks)
- Turtles in Time relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Tezzeret's Ambition relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- March of Progress relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Unnerving Grasp relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Silent Departure relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Waterbending Lesson relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Mind Spiral relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Forging the Anchor relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.11 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Traverse Eternity relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Lunar Insight relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.09 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Winged Words relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.09 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
Planeswalkers
7
Planeswalkers
7 Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
All planeswalkers (7)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.28 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.18 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Karn, Living Legacy relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All utility lands (50)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.47 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Turtle Lair relevance 0.44 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Captivating Cave relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.34 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.34 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Zoetic Cavern relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.29 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Grasping Dunes relevance 0.39 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.27 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.21 · 25.7% (38 of 148 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.21 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.20 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.17 · 27.7% (41 of 148 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.18 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Cradle of the Accursed relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Castle Doom relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.14 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Northampton Farm relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Reef Roads relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Foundry of the Consuls relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 29.1% (43 of 148 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.09 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.10 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.10 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.08 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.06 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.07 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
Lands
21
Lands
21 Showing 1-10 of 21
Page size
All lands (21)
- Command Tower relevance 0.28 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.23 · 37.2% (55 of 148 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.19 · 48.6% (72 of 148 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.25 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.25 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.25 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.22 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.20 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Wastes relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.23 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 89.2% (132 of 148 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Donatello, Way with Machines, from 148 real Commander decks.