Cards like Way of the Cryomancer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Flux Channeler
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Flux Channeler 41%
- Dreamtide Whale 18%
Cards like Jace, Cunning Castaway
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Garruk Wildspeaker
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Teferi, Master of Time
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Wrenn and Realmbreaker
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Jace, Arcane Strategist
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Tezzeret, Cruel Machinist
Cards like Jace Beleren
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 32%
- Elvish Mystic 29%
- Fyndhorn Elves 18%
- Boreal Druid 6%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Gyre Engineer, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Experimental Augury
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Contentious Plan
6.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards like Doubling Season
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Oath of Jace relevance 0.47 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Way of the Cryomancer relevance 0.44 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Cunning Castaway relevance 0.43 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.42 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.35 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.40 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.41 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Jace's Machinations relevance 0.40 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Bioessence Hydra relevance 0.38 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Teferi's Talent relevance 0.38 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Sparkshaper Visionary relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Protege's Awakening relevance 0.39 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.33 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Way of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.38 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- The Chain Veil relevance 0.37 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Avatar of Burgeoning Echoes relevance 0.36 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Way of the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.35 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Chandra, Chill of Compliance relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Oath of Nissa relevance 0.36 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.34 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Way of the Paradox relevance 0.35 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.30 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.34 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Jace, the Living Guildpact relevance 0.35 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Plan for All Outcomes relevance 0.35 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Arcane Amphisbaena relevance 0.34 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.26 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.30 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.31 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.31 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Countersculpt relevance 0.32 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.28 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.29 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Reality Sculptor relevance 0.31 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.30 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.28 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.28 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Jace's Triumph relevance 0.32 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Tamiyo, Compleated Sage relevance 0.28 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Entrust the Spark relevance 0.32 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.28 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Will Kenrith relevance 0.32 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.29 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Kiora, the Crashing Wave relevance 0.25 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.26 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Jace, the Perfected Mind relevance 0.29 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Theorist's Proxy relevance 0.30 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Luxior, Giada's Gift relevance 0.28 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Mu Yanling, Sky Dancer relevance 0.29 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Bioessence Hydra relevance 0.38 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Sparkshaper Visionary relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Avatar of Burgeoning Echoes relevance 0.36 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Arcane Amphisbaena relevance 0.34 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.26 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.26 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Theorist's Proxy relevance 0.30 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.23 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Kiora of Salt and Sand relevance 0.27 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Diamond Lion relevance 0.27 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.20 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.22 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Proft, Consulting Detective relevance 0.25 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.21 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.19 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.16 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Tainted Observer relevance 0.20 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.18 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.19 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Guildpact Informant relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Plaguemaw Beast relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.18 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.17 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.14 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.16 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Intrepid Paleontologist relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.14 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Garruk's Warsteed relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Jadzi, Steward of Fate // Oracle's Gift relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Hardbristle Bandit relevance 0.16 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Sparkhunter Masticore relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Great Divide Guide relevance 0.16 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Vivien's Grizzly relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Gilded Goose relevance 0.14 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Mind Meanderer relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.13 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Bugenhagen, Wise Elder relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Keeper of the Quiet Hour relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Shifting Wall relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Dandân relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Channeler Initiate relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Stormkeld Prowler relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Thunder Drake relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Clinging Anemones relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.35 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- The Chain Veil relevance 0.37 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Luxior, Giada's Gift relevance 0.28 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Honor-Worn Shaku relevance 0.27 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.20 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.19 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.19 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.19 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Eye of Jace relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Geometric Nexus relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Lotus Blossom relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Fractal Harness relevance 0.10 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Tamiyo's Logbook relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.10 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Simic Keyrune relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mirror Gallery relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Glowcap Lantern relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.07 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.09 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Simic Cluestone relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Simic Locket relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.08 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.08 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.08 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.08 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.06 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Brass Infiniscope relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.04 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.04 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.03 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Oath of Jace relevance 0.47 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Way of the Cryomancer relevance 0.44 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Teferi's Talent relevance 0.38 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Way of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.38 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Way of the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Oath of Nissa relevance 0.36 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Way of the Paradox relevance 0.35 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Plan for All Outcomes relevance 0.35 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.22 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Vivien's Talent relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.14 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- In Too Deep relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.13 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.13 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.14 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Kasmina's Transmutation relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.12 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.12 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.12 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.11 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Tamiyo's Compleation relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.11 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Paradox Zone relevance 0.11 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Gourmand's Talent relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.10 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Stasis Field relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Wingspan Stride relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- The Tale of Tamiyo relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Death's Presence relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.09 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Bounty of the Luxa relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Fisher's Talent relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- In Search of Greatness relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Additive Evolution relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
All instants (50)
- Jace's Machinations relevance 0.40 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Countersculpt relevance 0.32 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.23 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.24 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.18 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.20 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Compel Brutality relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Reject relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.14 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Applied Biomancy relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Quandrix Command relevance 0.13 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.14 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 0.16 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.13 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.11 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.12 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.12 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Verdant Command relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Snag relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Divide by Zero relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.11 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.11 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Verdant Rebirth relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Perplexing Test relevance 0.10 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.10 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Contact Other Plane relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Supreme Will relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Clockspinning relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Once Upon a Time relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Time Stop relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.08 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.08 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Protege's Awakening relevance 0.39 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Jace's Triumph relevance 0.32 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Entrust the Spark relevance 0.32 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Planewide Celebration relevance 0.28 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.22 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.24 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.22 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Tam's Resistance relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.20 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.20 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Drain Power relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.17 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Nissa's Triumph relevance 0.20 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Fractal Summoning relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.17 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Nissa's Encouragement relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Oversimplify relevance 0.14 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Sorcerous Squall relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.16 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.14 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.16 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Grasping Current relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Denying Wind relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Body of Research relevance 0.13 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Devouring Tendrils relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Bond of Flourishing relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.12 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Game Plan relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Earthen Arms relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.12 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Contingency Plan relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Retrieve relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Hard-Hitting Question relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Brave the Wilds relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.11 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Faerie Slumber Party relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Drawn from Dreams relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.10 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Fascination relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Ingenious Mastery relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Applied Geometry relevance 0.10 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.10 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Ecological Appreciation relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.10 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
All planeswalkers (50)
- Jace, Cunning Castaway relevance 0.43 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.42 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.40 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.41 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.33 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.35 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Chandra, Chill of Compliance relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.34 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.30 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.34 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Jace, the Living Guildpact relevance 0.35 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.30 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.31 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.31 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.28 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.29 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Reality Sculptor relevance 0.31 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.30 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.28 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.28 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Tamiyo, Compleated Sage relevance 0.28 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.28 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Will Kenrith relevance 0.32 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.29 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Kiora, the Crashing Wave relevance 0.25 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Jace, the Perfected Mind relevance 0.29 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Mu Yanling, Sky Dancer relevance 0.29 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.27 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.26 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Garruk, Curse Breaker relevance 0.27 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.25 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Garruk, Unleashed relevance 0.27 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.25 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.20 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Vivien, Arkbow Ranger relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.23 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.23 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.21 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Jace, Ingenious Mind-Mage relevance 0.23 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Oko, Lorwyn Liege // Oko, Shadowmoor Scion relevance 0.21 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.18 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Oko, the Ringleader relevance 0.21 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.19 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.22 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Kiora, Master of the Depths relevance 0.19 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Oko, the Trickster relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.20 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Mu Yanling relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Interplanar Beacon relevance 0.42 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Theorist's Sanctum relevance 0.31 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.15 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.20 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Big Apple, 3 a.m. relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.13 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.14 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.11 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.13 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Kitchen relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.13 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.12 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.11 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.09 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.12 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.10 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.11 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.11 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.09 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Mystifying Maze relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Beyeen Veil // Beyeen Coast relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Fertile Thicket relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.09 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.08 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.08 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.09 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.09 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.08 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.08 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.08 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.07 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.08 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.06 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Balamb Garden, SeeD Academy // Balamb Garden, Airborne relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
All lands (50)
- Transformative Commons relevance 0.20 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.12 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Timberland Ruins relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Archway Commons relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.09 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.09 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Aether Hub relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.09 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Cryptic Spires relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.10 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.09 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Treasure Map // Treasure Cove relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Wastes relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.08 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.08 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.09 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.09 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.06 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.07 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.06 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.08 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.06 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.08 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.08 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.07 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.04 · 58.8% (20 of 34 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.06 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.05 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.05 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.07 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.05 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.05 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kasmina, Enigma Sage, from 34 real Commander decks.