Vorapede
Played in 278 Green decks
2230+47+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
8.4% Green
Commanders
Michelangelo, Improviser 4.7% of decks
Michelangelo, Improviser 4.7% of decks
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma 1.1% of decks
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma 1.1% of decks
Pia, Aether Ascetic 1.9% of decks
Pia, Aether Ascetic 1.9% of decks
Thriss, Nantuko Primus 10.8% of decks
Thriss, Nantuko Primus 10.8% of decks
Radagast the Brown 1.6% of decks
Radagast the Brown 1.6% of decks
Nylea, God of the Hunt 2.6% of decks
Nylea, God of the Hunt 2.6% of decks
Most Relevant
End-Raze Forerunners 26.6% of decks
End-Raze Forerunners 26.6% of decks
Battle Mammoth 15.8% of decks
Battle Mammoth 15.8% of decks
Moldgraf Monstrosity 15.5% of decks
Moldgraf Monstrosity 15.5% of decks
Soul of the Harvest 29.5% of decks
Soul of the Harvest 29.5% of decks
Garruk's Packleader 25.2% of decks
Garruk's Packleader 25.2% of decks
Giant Adephage 18.3% of decks
Giant Adephage 18.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (22)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 1.90 · 4.7% (16 of 340 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.49 · 1.1% (34 of 3,006 decks)
- Pia, Aether Ascetic relevance 1.44 · 1.9% (16 of 840 decks)
- Thriss, Nantuko Primus relevance 1.33 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 1.23 · 1.6% (12 of 740 decks)
- Nylea, God of the Hunt relevance 1.02 · 2.6% (5 of 190 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.96 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Mister Hyde, Monster Within relevance 0.94 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.67 · 1.1% (4 of 356 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.66 · 1.1% (4 of 377 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.61 · 2.5% (2 of 81 decks)
- God-Eternal Rhonas relevance 0.36 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Ayumi, the Last Visitor relevance 0.36 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Rocksteady, Crash Courser relevance 0.36 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.34 · 1.8% (1 of 57 decks)
- Kolvori, God of Kinship // The Ringhart Crest relevance 0.33 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
- Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.33 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
- Loot, the Nexus relevance 0.33 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 0.30 · 1.2% (1 of 84 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.29 · 1.1% (1 of 87 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 0.29 · 1.1% (1 of 87 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.28 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.77 · 26.6% (74 of 278 decks)
- Battle Mammoth relevance 0.75 · 15.8% (44 of 278 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.74 · 15.5% (43 of 278 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.71 · 29.5% (82 of 278 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.67 · 25.2% (70 of 278 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.66 · 18.3% (51 of 278 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.66 · 27.3% (76 of 278 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 0.60 · 10.4% (29 of 278 decks)
- Arbor Colossus relevance 0.58 · 9.4% (26 of 278 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.58 · 30.6% (85 of 278 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.56 · 11.9% (33 of 278 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.55 · 15.5% (43 of 278 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.55 · 19.8% (55 of 278 decks)
- Greater Basilisk relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (23 of 278 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (38 of 278 decks)
- Ondu Giant relevance 0.51 · 7.6% (21 of 278 decks)
- Thrun, Breaker of Silence relevance 0.51 · 11.2% (31 of 278 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.50 · 17.6% (49 of 278 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (37 of 278 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (37 of 278 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.49 · 14.0% (39 of 278 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 0.48 · 16.5% (46 of 278 decks)
- Terra Stomper relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (24 of 278 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.46 · 9.4% (26 of 278 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.45 · 15.8% (44 of 278 decks)
- Crash of Rhino Beetles relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (23 of 278 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.44 · 14.7% (41 of 278 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.44 · 15.5% (43 of 278 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.44 · 16.5% (46 of 278 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 0.44 · 6.5% (18 of 278 decks)
All creatures (47)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.77 · 26.6% (74 of 278 decks)
- Battle Mammoth relevance 0.75 · 15.8% (44 of 278 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.74 · 15.5% (43 of 278 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.71 · 29.5% (82 of 278 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.67 · 25.2% (70 of 278 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.66 · 18.3% (51 of 278 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.66 · 27.3% (76 of 278 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 0.60 · 10.4% (29 of 278 decks)
- Arbor Colossus relevance 0.58 · 9.4% (26 of 278 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.58 · 30.6% (85 of 278 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.56 · 11.9% (33 of 278 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.55 · 15.5% (43 of 278 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.55 · 19.8% (55 of 278 decks)
- Greater Basilisk relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (23 of 278 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (38 of 278 decks)
- Ondu Giant relevance 0.51 · 7.6% (21 of 278 decks)
- Thrun, Breaker of Silence relevance 0.51 · 11.2% (31 of 278 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.50 · 17.6% (49 of 278 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (37 of 278 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (37 of 278 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.49 · 14.0% (39 of 278 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 0.48 · 16.5% (46 of 278 decks)
- Terra Stomper relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (24 of 278 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.46 · 9.4% (26 of 278 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.45 · 15.8% (44 of 278 decks)
- Crash of Rhino Beetles relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (23 of 278 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.44 · 14.7% (41 of 278 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.44 · 15.5% (43 of 278 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.44 · 16.5% (46 of 278 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 0.44 · 6.5% (18 of 278 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.43 · 11.2% (31 of 278 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.43 · 20.1% (56 of 278 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.43 · 11.2% (31 of 278 decks)
- Ulvenwald Captive // Ulvenwald Abomination relevance 0.42 · 6.5% (18 of 278 decks)
- Ant Queen relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (22 of 278 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.42 · 10.4% (29 of 278 decks)
- Yorvo, Lord of Garenbrig relevance 0.42 · 10.8% (30 of 278 decks)
- Outcaster Trailblazer relevance 0.42 · 13.7% (38 of 278 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.42 · 18.3% (51 of 278 decks)
- Hydra Omnivore relevance 0.41 · 12.6% (35 of 278 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.41 · 14.0% (39 of 278 decks)
- Almighty Brushwagg relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (17 of 278 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.41 · 32.4% (90 of 278 decks)
- Zoo Escapees relevance 0.40 · 6.1% (17 of 278 decks)
- Pharika's Disciple relevance 0.40 · 6.1% (17 of 278 decks)
- Heroes' Bane relevance 0.40 · 10.1% (28 of 278 decks)
- Cloudthresher relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (19 of 278 decks)
All lands (1)
- Command Bridge relevance 0.47 · 7.6% (21 of 278 decks)
EDH data for Vorapede: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 278 real decks.


































