Wu Scout
Played in 204 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
32.9% Blue
All commanders (11)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 4.50 · 14.6% (139 of 950 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.71 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 1.48 · 33.3% (3 of 9 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 1.21 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 0.99 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Bill Ferny, Bree Swindler relevance 0.89 · 1.5% (5 of 325 decks)
- Imoen, Mystic Trickster // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.74 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Higure, the Still Wind relevance 0.63 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Dungeon Delver // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.60 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.53 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro relevance 0.52 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.90 · 70.1% (143 of 204 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 2.22 · 32.8% (67 of 204 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 1.51 · 31.4% (64 of 204 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.49 · 38.2% (78 of 204 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 1.38 · 47.5% (97 of 204 decks)
- Soulknife Spy relevance 1.24 · 20.6% (42 of 204 decks)
- Broodbirth Viper relevance 1.23 · 21.1% (43 of 204 decks)
- Mist-Syndicate Naga relevance 1.21 · 24.5% (50 of 204 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.21 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 1.15 · 42.2% (86 of 204 decks)
- Neurok Commando relevance 1.15 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.13 · 23.0% (47 of 204 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 1.07 · 51.0% (104 of 204 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.98 · 36.8% (75 of 204 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.95 · 29.9% (61 of 204 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 0.91 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Marchesa's Infiltrator relevance 0.91 · 14.7% (30 of 204 decks)
- Schema Thief relevance 0.90 · 16.7% (34 of 204 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 0.82 · 22.1% (45 of 204 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 0.80 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar relevance 0.80 · 19.6% (40 of 204 decks)
- Stealer of Secrets relevance 0.80 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 0.79 · 18.6% (38 of 204 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 0.78 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
- Nine-Tail White Fox relevance 0.76 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Sturmgeist relevance 0.74 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.73 · 24.0% (49 of 204 decks)
- Diamond Mare relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.69 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- Thieving Otter relevance 0.69 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.90 · 70.1% (143 of 204 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 2.22 · 32.8% (67 of 204 decks)
- Soulknife Spy relevance 1.24 · 20.6% (42 of 204 decks)
- Broodbirth Viper relevance 1.23 · 21.1% (43 of 204 decks)
- Mist-Syndicate Naga relevance 1.21 · 24.5% (50 of 204 decks)
- Neurok Commando relevance 1.15 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.13 · 23.0% (47 of 204 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.98 · 36.8% (75 of 204 decks)
- Marchesa's Infiltrator relevance 0.91 · 14.7% (30 of 204 decks)
- Schema Thief relevance 0.90 · 16.7% (34 of 204 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 0.82 · 22.1% (45 of 204 decks)
- Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar relevance 0.80 · 19.6% (40 of 204 decks)
- Stealer of Secrets relevance 0.80 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 0.79 · 18.6% (38 of 204 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 0.78 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
- Nine-Tail White Fox relevance 0.76 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Sturmgeist relevance 0.74 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.73 · 24.0% (49 of 204 decks)
- Diamond Mare relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Thieving Otter relevance 0.69 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 0.67 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Knights of Dol Amroth relevance 0.67 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
- Cobbled Lancer relevance 0.66 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 0.65 · 12.3% (25 of 204 decks)
- Akroan Horse relevance 0.64 · 9.8% (20 of 204 decks)
- Phantasmal Mount relevance 0.63 · 9.3% (19 of 204 decks)
- Vanguard Suppressor relevance 0.60 · 9.8% (20 of 204 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.59 · 28.9% (59 of 204 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.57 · 21.1% (43 of 204 decks)
- Silent Hallcreeper relevance 0.56 · 18.6% (38 of 204 decks)
- Cosmos Charger relevance 0.56 · 8.8% (18 of 204 decks)
All artifacts (9)
- Quietus Spike relevance 1.51 · 31.4% (64 of 204 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 1.07 · 51.0% (104 of 204 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.95 · 29.9% (61 of 204 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.69 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.67 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.66 · 46.1% (94 of 204 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.62 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.57 · 40.2% (82 of 204 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.56 · 22.1% (45 of 204 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 1.38 · 47.5% (97 of 204 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 1.15 · 42.2% (86 of 204 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.55 · 45.1% (92 of 204 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.49 · 38.2% (78 of 204 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.21 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 0.91 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 0.80 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.55 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.54 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.56 · 27.5% (56 of 204 decks)
EDH data for Wu Scout: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 204 real decks.