Eye of Doom
Played in 160 Grixis decks
Color Identity Spread
19.3% Grixis
330+11+4+6+10+9+1+9+
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Jeleva, Nephalia's Scourge relevance 3.54 · 4.4% (70 of 1,581 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.89 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.46 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dismiss relevance 3.65 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
- Mirari relevance 3.62 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Echo Mage relevance 3.54 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 3.42 · 55.6% (89 of 160 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 3.39 · 50.6% (81 of 160 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 3.32 · 51.2% (82 of 160 decks)
- Guard Gomazoa relevance 3.30 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Arcane Melee relevance 3.26 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Nivix Guildmage relevance 3.25 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 3.19 · 51.2% (82 of 160 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 3.19 · 58.1% (93 of 160 decks)
- Price of Knowledge relevance 3.12 · 58.8% (94 of 160 decks)
- Grixis Charm relevance 3.10 · 57.5% (92 of 160 decks)
- Viseling relevance 3.08 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Phthisis relevance 3.04 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Starstorm relevance 2.99 · 52.5% (84 of 160 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 2.97 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Charmbreaker Devils relevance 2.93 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Wild Ricochet relevance 2.87 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Skyscribing relevance 2.87 · 55.0% (88 of 160 decks)
- Curse of Chaos relevance 2.86 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
- Curse of Inertia relevance 2.84 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
- Thraximundar relevance 2.84 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Vampire Nighthawk relevance 2.83 · 52.5% (84 of 160 decks)
- Sudden Spoiling relevance 2.83 · 57.5% (92 of 160 decks)
- Soul Manipulation relevance 2.74 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Augur of Bolas relevance 2.68 · 50.0% (80 of 160 decks)
- Curse of Shallow Graves relevance 2.59 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 2.51 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Army of the Damned relevance 2.48 · 55.0% (88 of 160 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Echo Mage relevance 3.54 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 3.39 · 50.6% (81 of 160 decks)
- Guard Gomazoa relevance 3.30 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Nivix Guildmage relevance 3.25 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Viseling relevance 3.08 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Charmbreaker Devils relevance 2.93 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Thraximundar relevance 2.84 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Vampire Nighthawk relevance 2.83 · 52.5% (84 of 160 decks)
- Augur of Bolas relevance 2.68 · 50.0% (80 of 160 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 2.51 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Nekusar, the Mindrazer relevance 1.74 · 41.9% (67 of 160 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Mirari relevance 3.62 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 3.19 · 51.2% (82 of 160 decks)
- Obelisk of Grixis relevance 2.43 · 55.6% (89 of 160 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 2.26 · 55.6% (89 of 160 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Arcane Melee relevance 3.26 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Price of Knowledge relevance 3.12 · 58.8% (94 of 160 decks)
- Curse of Chaos relevance 2.86 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
- Curse of Inertia relevance 2.84 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
- Curse of Shallow Graves relevance 2.59 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Spiteful Visions relevance 1.76 · 55.0% (88 of 160 decks)
All instants (10)
- Dismiss relevance 3.65 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 3.32 · 51.2% (82 of 160 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 3.19 · 58.1% (93 of 160 decks)
- Grixis Charm relevance 3.10 · 57.5% (92 of 160 decks)
- Starstorm relevance 2.99 · 52.5% (84 of 160 decks)
- Wild Ricochet relevance 2.87 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Sudden Spoiling relevance 2.83 · 57.5% (92 of 160 decks)
- Soul Manipulation relevance 2.74 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Crosis's Charm relevance 2.29 · 56.9% (91 of 160 decks)
- Vision Skeins relevance 2.27 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 3.42 · 55.6% (89 of 160 decks)
- Phthisis relevance 3.04 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 2.97 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Skyscribing relevance 2.87 · 55.0% (88 of 160 decks)
- Army of the Damned relevance 2.48 · 55.0% (88 of 160 decks)
- Incendiary Command relevance 2.30 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
- Prosperity relevance 2.18 · 55.6% (89 of 160 decks)
- Cruel Ultimatum relevance 1.93 · 56.3% (90 of 160 decks)
- Decree of Pain relevance 1.69 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Opal Palace relevance 2.49 · 58.8% (94 of 160 decks)
All lands (9)
- Rupture Spire relevance 3.22 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
- Vivid Marsh relevance 3.01 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Vivid Creek relevance 2.92 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Akoum Refuge relevance 2.50 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Molten Slagheap relevance 2.49 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Rakdos Guildgate relevance 2.32 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 2.27 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Grixis Panorama relevance 2.25 · 58.8% (94 of 160 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 2.22 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
EDH data for Eye of Doom: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 160 real decks.























































