Eye of Doom
Played in 38 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
330+17+4+5+5+7+1+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Xanathar, Guild Kingpin relevance 2.27 · 1.2% (16 of 1,299 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.61 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Alpharael, Dreaming Acolyte relevance 0.54 · 1.1% (1 of 89 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Eye of Vecna relevance 2.96 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Concealing Curtains // Revealing Eye relevance 2.86 · 47.4% (18 of 38 decks)
- Blink of an Eye relevance 2.56 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Ahriman relevance 2.51 · 50.0% (19 of 38 decks)
- Contact Other Plane relevance 2.42 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Baleful Beholder relevance 2.31 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 2.27 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 2.25 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Evil Eye of Orms-by-Gore relevance 2.12 · 52.6% (20 of 38 decks)
- Curious Homunculus // Voracious Reader relevance 2.04 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 2.03 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Evil Eye of Urborg relevance 2.02 · 50.0% (19 of 38 decks)
- Foresee relevance 1.94 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Cruel Witness relevance 1.88 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Ur-Golem's Eye relevance 1.79 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Eye of Duskmantle relevance 1.75 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 1.73 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 1.71 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Death Tyrant relevance 1.67 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 1.53 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Ever-Watching Threshold relevance 1.51 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Riddlekeeper relevance 1.46 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Eye of Nidhogg relevance 1.44 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 1.40 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Bonded Fetch relevance 1.30 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 1.27 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Portent relevance 1.25 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Hecteyes relevance 1.20 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Contingency Plan relevance 1.16 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Neurok Stealthsuit relevance 1.13 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Concealing Curtains // Revealing Eye relevance 2.86 · 47.4% (18 of 38 decks)
- Ahriman relevance 2.51 · 50.0% (19 of 38 decks)
- Baleful Beholder relevance 2.31 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Evil Eye of Orms-by-Gore relevance 2.12 · 52.6% (20 of 38 decks)
- Curious Homunculus // Voracious Reader relevance 2.04 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 2.03 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Evil Eye of Urborg relevance 2.02 · 50.0% (19 of 38 decks)
- Cruel Witness relevance 1.88 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Eye of Duskmantle relevance 1.75 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 1.73 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 1.71 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Death Tyrant relevance 1.67 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Riddlekeeper relevance 1.46 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Bonded Fetch relevance 1.30 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 1.27 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Hecteyes relevance 1.20 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.39 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Eye of Vecna relevance 2.96 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 2.27 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Ur-Golem's Eye relevance 1.79 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Neurok Stealthsuit relevance 1.13 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 2.25 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 1.53 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Ever-Watching Threshold relevance 1.51 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Eye of Nidhogg relevance 1.44 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.56 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
All instants (5)
- Blink of an Eye relevance 2.56 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Contact Other Plane relevance 2.42 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.96 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.60 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.34 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Foresee relevance 1.94 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 1.40 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Portent relevance 1.25 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Contingency Plan relevance 1.16 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Diabolic Vision relevance 1.01 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.58 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.53 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Hive of the Eye Tyrant relevance 2.13 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
All lands (3)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.63 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.50 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.49 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
EDH data for Eye of Doom: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 38 real decks.














































