Eye of Doom
Played in 48 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (4)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 3.67 · 4.4% (42 of 953 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Master Chef relevance 0.81 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Myojin of Life's Web relevance 0.68 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- M'Baku, Jabari Chieftain relevance 0.52 · 1.3% (1 of 77 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 5.13 · 81.3% (39 of 48 decks)
- Say Its Name relevance 4.99 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Wild Endeavor relevance 4.97 · 75.0% (36 of 48 decks)
- Molt Tender relevance 4.80 · 81.3% (39 of 48 decks)
- Rift Sower relevance 4.77 · 77.1% (37 of 48 decks)
- Migratory Greathorn relevance 4.47 · 70.8% (34 of 48 decks)
- Recollect relevance 4.46 · 81.3% (39 of 48 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 4.38 · 91.7% (44 of 48 decks)
- Season of Renewal relevance 4.22 · 77.1% (37 of 48 decks)
- Perilous Vault relevance 4.17 · 75.0% (36 of 48 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 4.15 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Verdant Confluence relevance 4.13 · 77.1% (37 of 48 decks)
- Gemrazer relevance 4.05 · 79.2% (38 of 48 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 4.02 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 3.99 · 85.4% (41 of 48 decks)
- Strider Harness relevance 3.96 · 58.3% (28 of 48 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 3.82 · 81.3% (39 of 48 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 3.77 · 85.4% (41 of 48 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 3.77 · 87.5% (42 of 48 decks)
- Tato Farmer relevance 3.74 · 68.8% (33 of 48 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 3.73 · 79.2% (38 of 48 decks)
- True Ancestry relevance 3.72 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 3.72 · 81.3% (39 of 48 decks)
- Revive relevance 3.68 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 3.64 · 81.3% (39 of 48 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 3.63 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 3.60 · 87.5% (42 of 48 decks)
- Lull relevance 3.57 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 3.47 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 3.35 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Molt Tender relevance 4.80 · 81.3% (39 of 48 decks)
- Rift Sower relevance 4.77 · 77.1% (37 of 48 decks)
- Migratory Greathorn relevance 4.47 · 70.8% (34 of 48 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 4.15 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Gemrazer relevance 4.05 · 79.2% (38 of 48 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 3.99 · 85.4% (41 of 48 decks)
- Tato Farmer relevance 3.74 · 68.8% (33 of 48 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 2.55 · 75.0% (36 of 48 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 2.27 · 60.4% (29 of 48 decks)
- Trickster's Elk relevance 2.15 · 47.9% (23 of 48 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 2.00 · 45.8% (22 of 48 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 5.13 · 81.3% (39 of 48 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 4.38 · 91.7% (44 of 48 decks)
- Perilous Vault relevance 4.17 · 75.0% (36 of 48 decks)
- Strider Harness relevance 3.96 · 58.3% (28 of 48 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 2.42 · 58.3% (28 of 48 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Lignify relevance 1.81 · 62.5% (30 of 48 decks)
All instants (7)
- Season of Renewal relevance 4.22 · 77.1% (37 of 48 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 3.77 · 85.4% (41 of 48 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 3.77 · 87.5% (42 of 48 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 3.60 · 87.5% (42 of 48 decks)
- Lull relevance 3.57 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 3.47 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 3.08 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
All sorceries (19)
- Say Its Name relevance 4.99 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Wild Endeavor relevance 4.97 · 75.0% (36 of 48 decks)
- Recollect relevance 4.46 · 81.3% (39 of 48 decks)
- Verdant Confluence relevance 4.13 · 77.1% (37 of 48 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 4.02 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 3.82 · 81.3% (39 of 48 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 3.73 · 79.2% (38 of 48 decks)
- True Ancestry relevance 3.72 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 3.72 · 81.3% (39 of 48 decks)
- Revive relevance 3.68 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 3.64 · 81.3% (39 of 48 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 3.63 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 3.35 · 83.3% (40 of 48 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 3.05 · 79.2% (38 of 48 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 3.03 · 64.6% (31 of 48 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 2.86 · 72.9% (35 of 48 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 2.39 · 87.5% (42 of 48 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 1.98 · 47.9% (23 of 48 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 1.86 · 54.2% (26 of 48 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Trenchpost relevance 5.19 · 77.1% (37 of 48 decks)
- Ominous Cemetery relevance 4.06 · 79.2% (38 of 48 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 3.59 · 87.5% (42 of 48 decks)
- Labyrinth of Skophos relevance 3.47 · 62.5% (30 of 48 decks)
- Capital City relevance 3.21 · 56.3% (27 of 48 decks)
- Mariposa Military Base relevance 3.02 · 56.3% (27 of 48 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 2.36 · 45.8% (22 of 48 decks)
EDH data for Eye of Doom: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 48 real decks.