Confound
Played in 1,170 Blue decks
3030+5+3+2+36+2+2+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Talrand, Sky Summoner 2.9% of decks
Talrand, Sky Summoner 2.9% of decks
Baral, Chief of Compliance 2.8% of decks
Baral, Chief of Compliance 2.8% of decks
Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor 1.9% of decks
Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor 1.9% of decks
Krang, the All-Powerful 3.4% of decks
Krang, the All-Powerful 3.4% of decks
Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan 3.3% of decks
Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan 3.3% of decks
Ertai, Wizard Adept 7.5% of decks
Ertai, Wizard Adept 7.5% of decks
Most Relevant
Keep Safe 32.2% of decks
Keep Safe 32.2% of decks
Disrupt 18.3% of decks
Disrupt 18.3% of decks
Bane's Contingency 17.0% of decks
Bane's Contingency 17.0% of decks
Exclude 13.7% of decks
Exclude 13.7% of decks
Cancel 16.6% of decks
Cancel 16.6% of decks
Archmage's Charm 28.9% of decks
Archmage's Charm 28.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 1.46 · 2.9% (101 of 3,482 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 1.40 · 2.8% (90 of 3,208 decks)
- Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor relevance 1.08 · 1.9% (71 of 3,738 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 1.02 · 3.4% (19 of 556 decks)
- Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan relevance 0.99 · 3.3% (18 of 543 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.92 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Alandra, Sky Dreamer relevance 0.87 · 2.1% (25 of 1,197 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.83 · 1.2% (75 of 6,299 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.80 · 1.6% (33 of 2,120 decks)
- Madame Web, Clairvoyant relevance 0.77 · 12.0% (3 of 25 decks)
- Bruvac the Grandiloquent relevance 0.75 · 1.2% (46 of 3,810 decks)
- Ruric Thar, Biomagus relevance 0.74 · 4.3% (6 of 139 decks)
- Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 0.73 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Kira, Great Glass-Spinner relevance 0.64 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Syr Elenora, the Discerning relevance 0.61 · 2.3% (8 of 352 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 0.59 · 4.0% (4 of 101 decks)
- Geist of Saint Thalia relevance 0.57 · 1.4% (14 of 1,023 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 0.56 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Keiga, the Tide Star relevance 0.52 · 2.1% (6 of 289 decks)
- Fblthp, Impossibly Lost relevance 0.51 · 1.4% (10 of 705 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 0.51 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Taniwha relevance 0.51 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.47 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.47 · 1.1% (11 of 960 decks)
- Memnarch relevance 0.46 · 1.0% (13 of 1,269 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.45 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.45 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Empress Galina relevance 0.40 · 1.3% (6 of 448 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.40 · 1.2% (7 of 593 decks)
- Hydro-Man, Fluid Felon relevance 0.39 · 1.8% (4 of 226 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Keep Safe relevance 1.26 · 32.2% (377 of 1,170 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.84 · 18.3% (214 of 1,170 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.70 · 17.0% (199 of 1,170 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.59 · 13.7% (160 of 1,170 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.54 · 16.6% (194 of 1,170 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.53 · 28.9% (338 of 1,170 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.53 · 35.1% (411 of 1,170 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.52 · 13.3% (156 of 1,170 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.52 · 14.5% (170 of 1,170 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 0.50 · 12.1% (142 of 1,170 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.49 · 25.4% (297 of 1,170 decks)
- Intervene relevance 0.48 · 8.3% (97 of 1,170 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.46 · 12.4% (145 of 1,170 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.46 · 15.8% (185 of 1,170 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.46 · 12.5% (146 of 1,170 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.43 · 10.0% (117 of 1,170 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.43 · 20.1% (235 of 1,170 decks)
- Abjure relevance 0.43 · 13.7% (160 of 1,170 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.41 · 13.4% (157 of 1,170 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.41 · 15.9% (186 of 1,170 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.41 · 14.5% (170 of 1,170 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.41 · 20.3% (237 of 1,170 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.40 · 9.7% (113 of 1,170 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.40 · 23.7% (277 of 1,170 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.40 · 21.8% (255 of 1,170 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (100 of 1,170 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.38 · 17.1% (200 of 1,170 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.38 · 24.5% (287 of 1,170 decks)
- Censor relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (80 of 1,170 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.37 · 12.8% (150 of 1,170 decks)
All creatures (5)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.40 · 23.7% (277 of 1,170 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.35 · 15.0% (175 of 1,170 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.33 · 18.3% (214 of 1,170 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.32 · 13.1% (153 of 1,170 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.31 · 15.3% (179 of 1,170 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.41 · 20.3% (237 of 1,170 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.36 · 20.9% (245 of 1,170 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.32 · 14.1% (165 of 1,170 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.40 · 21.8% (255 of 1,170 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.32 · 17.1% (200 of 1,170 decks)
All instants (36)
- Keep Safe relevance 1.26 · 32.2% (377 of 1,170 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.84 · 18.3% (214 of 1,170 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.70 · 17.0% (199 of 1,170 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.59 · 13.7% (160 of 1,170 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.54 · 16.6% (194 of 1,170 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.53 · 28.9% (338 of 1,170 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.53 · 35.1% (411 of 1,170 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.52 · 13.3% (156 of 1,170 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.52 · 14.5% (170 of 1,170 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 0.50 · 12.1% (142 of 1,170 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.49 · 25.4% (297 of 1,170 decks)
- Intervene relevance 0.48 · 8.3% (97 of 1,170 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.46 · 12.4% (145 of 1,170 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.46 · 15.8% (185 of 1,170 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.46 · 12.5% (146 of 1,170 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.43 · 10.0% (117 of 1,170 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.43 · 20.1% (235 of 1,170 decks)
- Abjure relevance 0.43 · 13.7% (160 of 1,170 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.41 · 13.4% (157 of 1,170 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.41 · 15.9% (186 of 1,170 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.41 · 14.5% (170 of 1,170 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.40 · 9.7% (113 of 1,170 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (100 of 1,170 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.38 · 17.1% (200 of 1,170 decks)
- Censor relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (80 of 1,170 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 0.37 · 7.2% (84 of 1,170 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.37 · 14.9% (174 of 1,170 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.36 · 14.8% (173 of 1,170 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.35 · 11.0% (129 of 1,170 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 0.35 · 6.8% (79 of 1,170 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.35 · 14.6% (171 of 1,170 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (129 of 1,170 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.34 · 7.7% (90 of 1,170 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.32 · 9.6% (112 of 1,170 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 0.31 · 5.1% (60 of 1,170 decks)
- Convolute relevance 0.31 · 5.9% (69 of 1,170 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Preordain relevance 0.38 · 24.5% (287 of 1,170 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.37 · 12.8% (150 of 1,170 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.32 · 15.6% (182 of 1,170 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.32 · 12.4% (145 of 1,170 decks)
EDH data for Confound: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,170 real decks.






















































