Confound
Played in 235 Jeskai decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (8)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 1.36 · 2.3% (9 of 386 decks)
- Shu Yun, the Silent Tempest relevance 1.12 · 1.5% (8 of 541 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- The Eighth Doctor // Dan Lewis relevance 0.53 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.52 · 1.2% (2 of 162 decks)
- The Eleventh Doctor // Dan Lewis relevance 0.51 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 0.40 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Hargilde, Kindly Runechanter relevance 0.34 · 1.3% (1 of 77 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Keep Safe relevance 1.73 · 31.9% (75 of 235 decks)
- Shelter relevance 0.96 · 21.7% (51 of 235 decks)
- Hindering Light relevance 0.96 · 20.4% (48 of 235 decks)
- Whirlwind of Thought relevance 0.74 · 48.5% (114 of 235 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.71 · 34.5% (81 of 235 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.71 · 34.9% (82 of 235 decks)
- Crash Through relevance 0.70 · 22.1% (52 of 235 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.65 · 29.8% (70 of 235 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (44 of 235 decks)
- Fists of Flame relevance 0.61 · 14.9% (35 of 235 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.60 · 26.8% (63 of 235 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.60 · 9.4% (22 of 235 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.59 · 42.6% (100 of 235 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.57 · 41.7% (98 of 235 decks)
- Jeskai Ascendancy relevance 0.55 · 26.8% (63 of 235 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.55 · 27.7% (65 of 235 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.55 · 14.0% (33 of 235 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.55 · 15.7% (37 of 235 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.54 · 12.8% (30 of 235 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.54 · 29.8% (70 of 235 decks)
- Monastery Mentor relevance 0.53 · 24.3% (57 of 235 decks)
- Boros Signet relevance 0.52 · 34.9% (82 of 235 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.52 · 8.1% (19 of 235 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.51 · 30.2% (71 of 235 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.51 · 33.2% (78 of 235 decks)
- Aura Blast relevance 0.50 · 8.1% (19 of 235 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.49 · 26.8% (63 of 235 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.49 · 26.0% (61 of 235 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (20 of 235 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.46 · 23.4% (55 of 235 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.65 · 29.8% (70 of 235 decks)
- Monastery Mentor relevance 0.53 · 24.3% (57 of 235 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.46 · 23.4% (55 of 235 decks)
- Balmor, Battlemage Captain relevance 0.42 · 15.3% (36 of 235 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.59 · 42.6% (100 of 235 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.57 · 41.7% (98 of 235 decks)
- Boros Signet relevance 0.52 · 34.9% (82 of 235 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.51 · 33.2% (78 of 235 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.45 · 15.3% (36 of 235 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Whirlwind of Thought relevance 0.74 · 48.5% (114 of 235 decks)
- Jeskai Ascendancy relevance 0.55 · 26.8% (63 of 235 decks)
- Aligned Heart relevance 0.42 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
All instants (23)
- Keep Safe relevance 1.73 · 31.9% (75 of 235 decks)
- Shelter relevance 0.96 · 21.7% (51 of 235 decks)
- Hindering Light relevance 0.96 · 20.4% (48 of 235 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.71 · 34.5% (81 of 235 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.71 · 34.9% (82 of 235 decks)
- Fists of Flame relevance 0.61 · 14.9% (35 of 235 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.60 · 26.8% (63 of 235 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.60 · 9.4% (22 of 235 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.55 · 14.0% (33 of 235 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.55 · 15.7% (37 of 235 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.54 · 12.8% (30 of 235 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.54 · 29.8% (70 of 235 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.52 · 8.1% (19 of 235 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.51 · 30.2% (71 of 235 decks)
- Aura Blast relevance 0.50 · 8.1% (19 of 235 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.49 · 26.0% (61 of 235 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (20 of 235 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.46 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.43 · 8.9% (21 of 235 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.42 · 7.2% (17 of 235 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 0.42 · 9.8% (23 of 235 decks)
- Disorder in the Court relevance 0.41 · 9.4% (22 of 235 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.41 · 8.9% (21 of 235 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Crash Through relevance 0.70 · 22.1% (52 of 235 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (44 of 235 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.55 · 27.7% (65 of 235 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.49 · 26.8% (63 of 235 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.46 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
- Warlord's Fury relevance 0.46 · 9.8% (23 of 235 decks)
- Distorting Wake relevance 0.42 · 9.4% (22 of 235 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.42 · 11.5% (27 of 235 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Legion Leadership // Legion Stronghold relevance 0.43 · 14.5% (34 of 235 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.43 · 11.9% (28 of 235 decks)
- Perilous Landscape relevance 0.41 · 20.9% (49 of 235 decks)
All lands (4)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.47 · 35.7% (84 of 235 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.45 · 30.2% (71 of 235 decks)
- Ferrous Lake relevance 0.44 · 20.0% (47 of 235 decks)
- Rugged Prairie relevance 0.41 · 29.8% (70 of 235 decks)
EDH data for Confound: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 235 real decks.