Cephalid Pathmage
Played in 221 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
36.9% Blue
All commanders (10)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 5.39 · 62.3% (101 of 162 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.93 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 1.19 · 1.0% (17 of 1,655 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 0.80 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.79 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Kiora, the Rising Tide relevance 0.65 · 1.4% (3 of 210 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.62 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 0.53 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ultimecia, Temporal Threat relevance 0.53 · 1.5% (2 of 132 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.29 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 3.40 · 54.3% (120 of 221 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 3.13 · 54.3% (120 of 221 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 2.96 · 60.2% (133 of 221 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 2.61 · 47.5% (105 of 221 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 2.48 · 47.1% (104 of 221 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 2.44 · 39.4% (87 of 221 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.41 · 42.5% (94 of 221 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.31 · 47.1% (104 of 221 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 2.01 · 34.4% (76 of 221 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 1.86 · 30.8% (68 of 221 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 1.69 · 30.3% (67 of 221 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.56 · 36.7% (81 of 221 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.42 · 29.4% (65 of 221 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.27 · 26.7% (59 of 221 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.27 · 24.4% (54 of 221 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.26 · 24.4% (54 of 221 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.22 · 21.7% (48 of 221 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.21 · 35.3% (78 of 221 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.19 · 38.0% (84 of 221 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.15 · 22.6% (50 of 221 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.14 · 20.8% (46 of 221 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.06 · 29.9% (66 of 221 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.05 · 20.4% (45 of 221 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.05 · 19.0% (42 of 221 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.03 · 31.7% (70 of 221 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.00 · 17.6% (39 of 221 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.98 · 19.5% (43 of 221 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.97 · 17.2% (38 of 221 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.95 · 14.9% (33 of 221 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.89 · 14.5% (32 of 221 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 3.40 · 54.3% (120 of 221 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 3.13 · 54.3% (120 of 221 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 2.96 · 60.2% (133 of 221 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 2.61 · 47.5% (105 of 221 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 2.48 · 47.1% (104 of 221 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 2.44 · 39.4% (87 of 221 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.41 · 42.5% (94 of 221 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.31 · 47.1% (104 of 221 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 1.69 · 30.3% (67 of 221 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.27 · 26.7% (59 of 221 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.27 · 24.4% (54 of 221 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.26 · 24.4% (54 of 221 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.21 · 35.3% (78 of 221 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.19 · 38.0% (84 of 221 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.14 · 20.8% (46 of 221 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.03 · 31.7% (70 of 221 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.00 · 17.6% (39 of 221 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.98 · 19.5% (43 of 221 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.97 · 17.2% (38 of 221 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.95 · 14.9% (33 of 221 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.89 · 14.5% (32 of 221 decks)
- Escape Artist relevance 0.81 · 11.8% (26 of 221 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.68 · 13.1% (29 of 221 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.64 · 12.2% (27 of 221 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (22 of 221 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.58 · 8.6% (19 of 221 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.55 · 10.0% (22 of 221 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (23 of 221 decks)
- Aether Figment relevance 0.50 · 7.7% (17 of 221 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.05 · 19.0% (42 of 221 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.79 · 25.8% (57 of 221 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.58 · 33.9% (75 of 221 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (25 of 221 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 1.86 · 30.8% (68 of 221 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.56 · 36.7% (81 of 221 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.22 · 21.7% (48 of 221 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.15 · 22.6% (50 of 221 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.05 · 20.4% (45 of 221 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (37 of 221 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (23 of 221 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (25 of 221 decks)
All instants (2)
- Deluge relevance 0.61 · 11.3% (25 of 221 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 0.49 · 7.7% (17 of 221 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 2.01 · 34.4% (76 of 221 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.42 · 29.4% (65 of 221 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.06 · 29.9% (66 of 221 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.73 · 23.1% (51 of 221 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.54 · 17.2% (38 of 221 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.64 · 14.5% (32 of 221 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.76 · 31.7% (70 of 221 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Pathmage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 221 real decks.