Cephalid Pathmage
Played in 62 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
10.4% Simic
230+49+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Sita Varma, Masked Racer relevance 1.32 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.47 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 1.59 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.44 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Kraken of the Straits relevance 1.34 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 1.34 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 1.31 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 1.27 · 43.5% (27 of 62 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.25 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.21 · 30.6% (19 of 62 decks)
- Sin, Unending Cataclysm relevance 1.20 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 1.19 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 1.18 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 1.17 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.15 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.14 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Reservoir Kraken relevance 1.13 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 1.12 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 1.11 · 37.1% (23 of 62 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.09 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Nimbus Swimmer relevance 1.08 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 1.08 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 1.07 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 1.06 · 30.6% (19 of 62 decks)
- Biblioplex Kraken relevance 1.05 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 1.05 · 30.6% (19 of 62 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 1.03 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 1.01 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.99 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.99 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.98 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.96 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
All creatures (49)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 1.59 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.44 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Kraken of the Straits relevance 1.34 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 1.34 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 1.31 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 1.27 · 43.5% (27 of 62 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.25 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.21 · 30.6% (19 of 62 decks)
- Sin, Unending Cataclysm relevance 1.20 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 1.19 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 1.18 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 1.17 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.15 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.14 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Reservoir Kraken relevance 1.13 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 1.12 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 1.11 · 37.1% (23 of 62 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.09 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Nimbus Swimmer relevance 1.08 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 1.08 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 1.07 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 1.06 · 30.6% (19 of 62 decks)
- Biblioplex Kraken relevance 1.05 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 1.05 · 30.6% (19 of 62 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 1.03 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 1.01 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.99 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.99 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.98 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.96 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Breaching Leviathan relevance 0.94 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.94 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.93 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.91 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Wormhole Serpent relevance 0.91 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.90 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Simic Sky Swallower relevance 0.88 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 0.87 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.86 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.86 · 37.1% (23 of 62 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.85 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 0.84 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Scrapdiver Serpent relevance 0.82 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.81 · 35.5% (22 of 62 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.80 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Tidal Kraken relevance 0.80 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Jhessian Infiltrator relevance 0.80 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Grozoth relevance 0.79 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.78 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.93 · 37.1% (23 of 62 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Pathmage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 62 real decks.
























