Colors Blue Remove filter: Colors Blue
Cephalid Inkshrouder
Played in 152 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
6.7% Blue
Commanders
5
Commanders
5Showing 1-5 of 5
Page size
All commanders (5)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 5.43 · 55.0% (88 of 160 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.58 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Urza, Powerstone Prodigy relevance 0.81 · 1.2% (4 of 328 decks)
- Bilbo Baggins, Burglar // Take a Glance relevance 0.53 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Edgar, King of Figaro relevance 0.34 · 1.1% (1 of 89 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 4.37 · 65.8% (100 of 152 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 4.29 · 68.4% (104 of 152 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 3.96 · 68.4% (104 of 152 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 3.62 · 58.6% (89 of 152 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 3.43 · 69.7% (106 of 152 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 3.33 · 60.5% (92 of 152 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 3.05 · 57.9% (88 of 152 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.87 · 50.7% (77 of 152 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.61 · 53.3% (81 of 152 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 2.54 · 43.4% (66 of 152 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 2.30 · 38.2% (58 of 152 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.17 · 38.8% (59 of 152 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.97 · 46.1% (70 of 152 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.81 · 37.5% (57 of 152 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.64 · 48.0% (73 of 152 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.57 · 30.3% (46 of 152 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.56 · 27.6% (42 of 152 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.56 · 30.3% (46 of 152 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.53 · 32.2% (49 of 152 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.47 · 28.9% (44 of 152 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.45 · 26.3% (40 of 152 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.40 · 44.7% (68 of 152 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.38 · 24.3% (37 of 152 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.31 · 23.7% (36 of 152 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.27 · 22.4% (34 of 152 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.26 · 24.3% (37 of 152 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.26 · 35.5% (54 of 152 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.19 · 23.7% (36 of 152 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.18 · 18.4% (28 of 152 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.14 · 34.9% (53 of 152 decks)
Creatures
29
Creatures
29 Showing 1-10 of 29
Page size
All creatures (29)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 4.37 · 65.8% (100 of 152 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 4.29 · 68.4% (104 of 152 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 3.96 · 68.4% (104 of 152 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 3.62 · 58.6% (89 of 152 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 3.43 · 69.7% (106 of 152 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 3.33 · 60.5% (92 of 152 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 3.05 · 57.9% (88 of 152 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.87 · 50.7% (77 of 152 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.61 · 53.3% (81 of 152 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.17 · 38.8% (59 of 152 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.64 · 48.0% (73 of 152 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.57 · 30.3% (46 of 152 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.56 · 30.3% (46 of 152 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.53 · 32.2% (49 of 152 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.45 · 26.3% (40 of 152 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.40 · 44.7% (68 of 152 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.38 · 24.3% (37 of 152 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.27 · 22.4% (34 of 152 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.19 · 23.7% (36 of 152 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.18 · 18.4% (28 of 152 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.14 · 34.9% (53 of 152 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.05 · 17.1% (26 of 152 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.98 · 19.1% (29 of 152 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.83 · 15.8% (24 of 152 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.75 · 11.8% (18 of 152 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.74 · 14.5% (22 of 152 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.71 · 10.5% (16 of 152 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.65 · 11.8% (18 of 152 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.58 · 14.5% (22 of 152 decks)
Artifacts
3
Artifacts
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All artifacts (3)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.31 · 23.7% (36 of 152 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.89 · 28.9% (44 of 152 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.57 · 13.2% (20 of 152 decks)
Enchantments
9
Enchantments
9 Showing 1-9 of 9
Page size
All enchantments (9)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 2.30 · 38.2% (58 of 152 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.97 · 46.1% (70 of 152 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.56 · 27.6% (42 of 152 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.47 · 28.9% (44 of 152 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.26 · 24.3% (37 of 152 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 0.78 · 13.2% (20 of 152 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.71 · 19.1% (29 of 152 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.69 · 15.8% (24 of 152 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.58 · 13.8% (21 of 152 decks)
Instants
3
Instants
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All instants (3)
- Deluge relevance 0.78 · 14.5% (22 of 152 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 0.71 · 11.2% (17 of 152 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.58 · 15.1% (23 of 152 decks)
Sorceries
4
Sorceries
4 Showing 1-4 of 4
Page size
All sorceries (4)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 2.54 · 43.4% (66 of 152 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.81 · 37.5% (57 of 152 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.26 · 35.5% (54 of 152 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.88 · 27.6% (42 of 152 decks)
Planeswalkers
1
Planeswalkers
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.75 · 17.1% (26 of 152 decks)
Utility Lands
1
Utility Lands
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All utility lands (1)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 1.02 · 42.8% (65 of 152 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Inkshrouder: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 152 real decks.